Abstract
It has been hypothesized that the relative role of species dispersal in determining plant community composition and species richness changes along primary productivity and disturbance intensity gradients. Manipulative experiments with either diaspore addition or prevention are needed to validate this hypothesis. Due to methodological constraints, diaspore prevention experiments are rarely used. In the case of diaspore addition experiments, there are some potential sources of error. (1) Experiments may be confounded since patchiness of microbial communities is not considered and techniques equalizing microbial communities over study plots are not used. (2) The length of the period of observation may not be sufficient to understand whether the establishment of sown individuals was really successful. (3) The effect of the sowing treatment and the theoretical context of the whole experiment depends on the number and identity of species sown. When addressing the role of long-distance dispersal, it is almost impossible to say what the appropriate number and composition of species to be used for the experiment should be. (4) Until now, most of the attention has been on dispersal in space, while the role of “dispersal in time” (seed bank) has rarely been addressed. We conclude that stepwise accumulation of experimental studies, addressing the role of dispersal in shaping plant communities, will sooner or later reveal general patterns, given the experiments are well planned and aim to avoid the sources of errors described above.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin M.P. (1999): The potential contribution of vegetation ecology to biodiversity research.Ecography 22: 465–484.
Bakker J.P., Bakker E.S., Rosén E., Verveij G.L. &Bekker R.M. (1996): Soil seed bank composition along a gradient from dry alvar grassland toJuniperus shrubland.J. Veg. Sci. 7: 165–176.
Bakker J.P. &Berendse F. (1999): Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities.Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 63–68.
Bekker R.M., Verweij G.L., Bakker J.P. &Fresco L.F. (2000): Soil seed bank dynamics in hayfield succession.J. Ecol. 88: 594–607.
Braun-Blanquet J. (1932):Plant sociology. The study of plant communities. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.
Brown A.H.F. &Oosterhuis L. (1981): The role of buried seed in coppicewoods.Biol. Conservation 21: 19–38.
Brown J.R. &Archer S. (1999): Shrub invasion of grassland: recruitment is continuous and not regulated by herbaceous biomass or density.Ecology 80: 2385–2396.
Burke M.J.W. &Grime J.P. (1996): An experimental study of plant community invasibility.Ecology 77: 776–790.
Cain M.L., Milligan G. &Strand A.E. (2000): Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations.Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1217–1227.
Caley M.J. &Schluter D. (1997): The relationship between local and regional diversity.Ecology 78: 70–80.
Chesson P.L. (1986): Environmental variability and the coexistence of species. In:Diamond J. (ed.),Community ecology, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 240–256.
Clements F.E. (1916):Plant succession, and analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington.
Cornell H.V. &Lawton J.H. (1992): Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective.J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 1–12.
Duncan R.S. &Chapman C.A. (1999): Seed dispersal and potential forest succession in abandoned agriculture in tropical Africa.Ecol. Appl. 9: 998–1008.
Ericson L., Burdon J.J. &Müller W.J. (1999): Spatial and temporal dynamics of epidemics of the rust fungusUromyces valerianae on populations of its hostValeriana salina.J. Ecol. 87: 649–658.
Eriksson O. (1993): The species-pool hypothesis and plant community diversity.Oikos 68: 371–374.
Foster B.L. (2001): Constraints on colonization and species richness along a grassland productivity gradient: the role of propagule availability.Ecol. Letters 4: 530–535.
Foster B.L., Dickson T.L., Murphy C.A., Karel I. &Smith V.H. (2004): Propagule pools mediate community assembly and diversity-ecosystem regulation along a grassland productivity gradient.J. Ecol. 92: 435–449.
Foster B.L. &Tilman D (2003): Seed limitation and the regulation of community structure in oak savanna grassland.J. Ecol. 91: 999–1007.
Gilpin M.E. &Hanski I. (1991):Metapopulation dynamics. Academic Press, London.
Gough L., Grace J.B. &Taylor K.L. (1994): The relationship between species richness and community biomass: the importance of environmental variables.Oikos 70: 271–279.
Grace J.B. (1999): The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment.Perspect. Pl. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2: 1–28.
Gustafsson C., Ehrlén J. &Eriksson O. (2002): Recruitment inDentaria bulbifera; the roles of dispersal, habitat quality and mollusc herbivory.J. Veg. Sci. 13: 719–724.
Harrison S. (1997): How natural habitat patchiness affects the distribution of diversity in Californian serpentine chaparral.Ecology 78: 1898–1906.
Harrison S. (1999): Local and regional diversity in a patchy landscape: native, alien, and endemic herbs on serpentine.Ecology 80: 70–80.
Helgason T., Merryweather J.W., Denison J., Wilson P., Young J.P.W. &Fitter A.H. (2002): Selectivity and functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas of co-occurring fungi and plants from a temperate deciduous woodland.J. Ecol. 90: 371–384.
Holt R.D. (1997): From metapopulation dynamics to community structure: some consequences of environmental heterogeneity. In:Hanski I.A. (ed.),Metapopulation dynamics: ecology, genetics and evolution, Academic Press, New York, pp. 149–165.
Huston M.A. (1999): Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals.Oikos 86: 393–401.
Hutchings M.J. &Booth K.D. (1996): Studies on the feasibility of re-creating chalk grassland vegetation on ex-arable land. I. The potential roles of seed bank and seed rain.J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 1171–1181.
Jankowska-Błaszczuk M., Kwiatkowska A.J., Panufnik D. &Tanner E. (1998): The size and diversity of the soil seed banks and the light requirements of the species in sunny and shady natural communities of the Białowieża Primeval Forest.Pl. Ecol. 136: 105–118.
Kalamees R. &Zobel M. (1998): Soil seed bank composition in different successional stages of a species rich wooded meadow in Laelatu, western Estonia.Acta Oecol. 19: 175–180.
Kalamees R. &Zobel M. (2002): The role of the seed bank in gap regeneration in a calcareous grassland community.Ecology 83: 1017–1025.
King S.E. &Grace J.B. (2000): The effects of gap size and disturbance type on invasion of wet pine savanna by cogongrass,Imperata cylindrica (Poaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1279–1286.
Klironomos J.N. (2002): Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities.Nature 417: 67–70.
Koide R.T. &Li M. (1989): Appropriate controls for vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza research.New Phytol. 111: 35–44
Kupferschmid A.D., Stampfli A. &Newbery D.M. (2000): Dispersal and microsite limitation in an abandoned calcareous grassland of the southern Prealps.Folia Geobot. 35: 125–141.
Leuchtmann A. &Clay K. (1989): Experimental evidence for genetic variation in compatability between the fungusAtkinsonella hypoxylon and its three host grasses.Evolution 43: 825–834.
Levine J.M. (2001): Local interactions, dispersal, and native and exotic plant diversity along a California stream.Oikos 95: 397–408.
Livingston R.B. &Allessio M.L. (1968): Buried viable seed in successional field and forest stands, Harvard Forest, Massachusetts.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 95: 58–69.
Lord L.A. &Lee T.D. (2001): Interactions of local and regional processes: species richness in tussock sedge communities.Ecology 82: 313–318.
Lyons K.G. &Schwartz M.W. (2001): Rare species loss alters ecosystem function — invasion resistance.Ecol. Letters 4: 358–365.
MacArthur R.H. (1972):Geographical ecology. Patterns in the distribution of species. Harper and Row, New York.
MacArthur R.H. &Connell J.H. (1966):The biology of populations. J. Wiley, New York.
Moora M., Öpik M., Sen R. &Zobel M. (2004): Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities differentially influence the seedling performance of rare and commonPulsatilla species.Funct. Ecol. 18: 554–562.
Mouquet N., Leadley P., Meriguet J. &Loreau M. (2004): Immigration and local competition in herbaceous plant communities: a three-year seed-sowing experiment.Oikos 104: 77–90.
Mueller-Dombois D. &Ellenberg H. (1974):Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. J.Wiley, New York.
Naeem S., Knops J.M.H., Howe K.M., Kennedy T. &Gale S. (2000): Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors.Oikos 91: 97–108.
Öpik M., Moora M., Liira J., Koljalg U., Zobel M. &Sen R. (2003): Divergent arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities colonize roots ofPulsatilla spp. in boreal Scots pine forest and grassland soils.New Phytol. 160: 581–593.
Pärtel M., Zobel M., Liira J. &Zobel K. (2000): Species richness limitations in productive and oligotrophic plant communities.Oikos 90: 191–193.
Pärtel M., Zobel M., Zobel K. &van der Maarel E. (1996): The species pool and its relation to species richness — evidence from Estonian plant communities.Oikos 75: 111–117.
Peart D.R. (1989): Species interactions in a successional grassland. I. Seed rain and seedling recruitment.J. Ecol. 77: 236–251.
Petryna L., Moora M., Nunes C.O., Cantero J.J. &Zobel M. (2002): Are invaders disturbance-limited? Conservation of mountain grasslands in Central Argentina.Appl. Veg. Sci. 5: 195–202.
Pickett S.T.A. &McDonnell M.J. (1989): Seed bank dynamics in temperate deciduous forest. In:Leck M.A., Parker V.T. &Simpson R.L. (eds.),Ecology of soil seed banks, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 123–147.
Reynolds H.L., Packer A., Bever J.D. &Clay K. (2003): Grassroots ecology: plant-microbe-soil interactions as drivers of plant community structure and dynamics.Ecology 84: 2281–2291.
Richardson D.M., Cowling R.M., Lamont B.B. &Van Hensbergen H.J. (1995): Coexistence ofBanksia species in southwestern Australia: the role of regional and local processes.J. Veg. Sci. 6: 329–342.
Ricklefs R. (1987): Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes.Science 235: 167–171.
Rosenzweig M.L. (1997):Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Saikkonen K., Faeth S.H., Helander M. &Sullivan T.J. (1998): Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 319–343.
Salonen V. (1987): Relationship between the seed rain and the establishment of vegetation in two areas abandoned after peat harvesting.Holarc. Ecol. 10: 171–174.
Salonen V. &Setälä H. (1992): Plant colonization of bare peat surface — relative importance of seed availability and soil.Ecography 15: 199–204.
Schott G.W. &Hamburg S.P. (1997): The seed rain and seed bank of an adjacent native tallgrass prairie and old field.Canad. J. Bot. 75: 1–7.
Stampfli A. &Zeiter M. (1999): Plant species decline due to abandonment of meadows cannot easily be reversed by mowing. A case study from the southern Alps.J. Veg. Sci. 10: 151–164.
Symstad A.J. (2000): A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility.Ecology 81: 99–109.
Taylor D.R., Aarssen L.W. &Loehle C. (1990): On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies.Oikos 58: 239–250.
Tilman D. (1982):Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Tilman D. (1997): Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity.Ecology 78: 81–92.
Turnbull L.A., Crawley M.J. &Rees M. (2000): Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments.Oikos 88: 225–238.
Van der Putten W. (2000): Pathogen-driven forest diversity.Nature 404: 232–233.
Wilsey B.J. &Polley H.W. (2003): Effects of seed additions and grazing history on diversity and productivity of subhumid grasslands.Ecology 84: 920–931.
Wisheu I.C. &Keddy P. (1996): Three competing models for predicting the size of species pools: a test using eastern North American wetlands.Oikos 76: 253–258.
Xiong S., Johansson M.E., Hughes F.M.R., Hayes A., Richards K.S. &Nilsson C. (2003): Interactive effects of soil moisture, vegetation canopy, plant litter and seed addition on plant diversity in a wetland community.J. Ecol. 91: 976–986.
Zobel K. (2001): On the species-pool hypothesis and on the quasi-neutral concept of plant community diversity.Folia Geobot. 36: 3–8.
Zobel M. (1992): Plant species coexistence — the role of historical, evolutionary and ecological factors.Oikos 65: 314–320.
Zobel M. (1997): The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence?Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 266–269.
Zobel M., Otsus M., Liira J., Moora M. &Möls T. (2000): Is small-scale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability?Ecology 81: 3274–3282.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zobel, M., Kalamees, R. Diversity and dispersal — Can the link be approached experimentally?. Folia Geobot 40, 3–11 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803040
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803040