Skip to main content
Log in

Diversity and dispersal — Can the link be approached experimentally?

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that the relative role of species dispersal in determining plant community composition and species richness changes along primary productivity and disturbance intensity gradients. Manipulative experiments with either diaspore addition or prevention are needed to validate this hypothesis. Due to methodological constraints, diaspore prevention experiments are rarely used. In the case of diaspore addition experiments, there are some potential sources of error. (1) Experiments may be confounded since patchiness of microbial communities is not considered and techniques equalizing microbial communities over study plots are not used. (2) The length of the period of observation may not be sufficient to understand whether the establishment of sown individuals was really successful. (3) The effect of the sowing treatment and the theoretical context of the whole experiment depends on the number and identity of species sown. When addressing the role of long-distance dispersal, it is almost impossible to say what the appropriate number and composition of species to be used for the experiment should be. (4) Until now, most of the attention has been on dispersal in space, while the role of “dispersal in time” (seed bank) has rarely been addressed. We conclude that stepwise accumulation of experimental studies, addressing the role of dispersal in shaping plant communities, will sooner or later reveal general patterns, given the experiments are well planned and aim to avoid the sources of errors described above.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin M.P. (1999): The potential contribution of vegetation ecology to biodiversity research.Ecography 22: 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker J.P., Bakker E.S., Rosén E., Verveij G.L. &Bekker R.M. (1996): Soil seed bank composition along a gradient from dry alvar grassland toJuniperus shrubland.J. Veg. Sci. 7: 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker J.P. &Berendse F. (1999): Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities.Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 63–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bekker R.M., Verweij G.L., Bakker J.P. &Fresco L.F. (2000): Soil seed bank dynamics in hayfield succession.J. Ecol. 88: 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J. (1932):Plant sociology. The study of plant communities. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown A.H.F. &Oosterhuis L. (1981): The role of buried seed in coppicewoods.Biol. Conservation 21: 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.R. &Archer S. (1999): Shrub invasion of grassland: recruitment is continuous and not regulated by herbaceous biomass or density.Ecology 80: 2385–2396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke M.J.W. &Grime J.P. (1996): An experimental study of plant community invasibility.Ecology 77: 776–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain M.L., Milligan G. &Strand A.E. (2000): Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations.Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1217–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caley M.J. &Schluter D. (1997): The relationship between local and regional diversity.Ecology 78: 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P.L. (1986): Environmental variability and the coexistence of species. In:Diamond J. (ed.),Community ecology, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 240–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements F.E. (1916):Plant succession, and analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell H.V. &Lawton J.H. (1992): Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective.J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan R.S. &Chapman C.A. (1999): Seed dispersal and potential forest succession in abandoned agriculture in tropical Africa.Ecol. Appl. 9: 998–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson L., Burdon J.J. &Müller W.J. (1999): Spatial and temporal dynamics of epidemics of the rust fungusUromyces valerianae on populations of its hostValeriana salina.J. Ecol. 87: 649–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O. (1993): The species-pool hypothesis and plant community diversity.Oikos 68: 371–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster B.L. (2001): Constraints on colonization and species richness along a grassland productivity gradient: the role of propagule availability.Ecol. Letters 4: 530–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster B.L., Dickson T.L., Murphy C.A., Karel I. &Smith V.H. (2004): Propagule pools mediate community assembly and diversity-ecosystem regulation along a grassland productivity gradient.J. Ecol. 92: 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster B.L. &Tilman D (2003): Seed limitation and the regulation of community structure in oak savanna grassland.J. Ecol. 91: 999–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin M.E. &Hanski I. (1991):Metapopulation dynamics. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough L., Grace J.B. &Taylor K.L. (1994): The relationship between species richness and community biomass: the importance of environmental variables.Oikos 70: 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace J.B. (1999): The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment.Perspect. Pl. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson C., Ehrlén J. &Eriksson O. (2002): Recruitment inDentaria bulbifera; the roles of dispersal, habitat quality and mollusc herbivory.J. Veg. Sci. 13: 719–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S. (1997): How natural habitat patchiness affects the distribution of diversity in Californian serpentine chaparral.Ecology 78: 1898–1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S. (1999): Local and regional diversity in a patchy landscape: native, alien, and endemic herbs on serpentine.Ecology 80: 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgason T., Merryweather J.W., Denison J., Wilson P., Young J.P.W. &Fitter A.H. (2002): Selectivity and functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas of co-occurring fungi and plants from a temperate deciduous woodland.J. Ecol. 90: 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt R.D. (1997): From metapopulation dynamics to community structure: some consequences of environmental heterogeneity. In:Hanski I.A. (ed.),Metapopulation dynamics: ecology, genetics and evolution, Academic Press, New York, pp. 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston M.A. (1999): Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals.Oikos 86: 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings M.J. &Booth K.D. (1996): Studies on the feasibility of re-creating chalk grassland vegetation on ex-arable land. I. The potential roles of seed bank and seed rain.J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 1171–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowska-Błaszczuk M., Kwiatkowska A.J., Panufnik D. &Tanner E. (1998): The size and diversity of the soil seed banks and the light requirements of the species in sunny and shady natural communities of the Białowieża Primeval Forest.Pl. Ecol. 136: 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamees R. &Zobel M. (1998): Soil seed bank composition in different successional stages of a species rich wooded meadow in Laelatu, western Estonia.Acta Oecol. 19: 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamees R. &Zobel M. (2002): The role of the seed bank in gap regeneration in a calcareous grassland community.Ecology 83: 1017–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • King S.E. &Grace J.B. (2000): The effects of gap size and disturbance type on invasion of wet pine savanna by cogongrass,Imperata cylindrica (Poaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1279–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos J.N. (2002): Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities.Nature 417: 67–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koide R.T. &Li M. (1989): Appropriate controls for vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza research.New Phytol. 111: 35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupferschmid A.D., Stampfli A. &Newbery D.M. (2000): Dispersal and microsite limitation in an abandoned calcareous grassland of the southern Prealps.Folia Geobot. 35: 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuchtmann A. &Clay K. (1989): Experimental evidence for genetic variation in compatability between the fungusAtkinsonella hypoxylon and its three host grasses.Evolution 43: 825–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J.M. (2001): Local interactions, dispersal, and native and exotic plant diversity along a California stream.Oikos 95: 397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston R.B. &Allessio M.L. (1968): Buried viable seed in successional field and forest stands, Harvard Forest, Massachusetts.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 95: 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord L.A. &Lee T.D. (2001): Interactions of local and regional processes: species richness in tussock sedge communities.Ecology 82: 313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons K.G. &Schwartz M.W. (2001): Rare species loss alters ecosystem function — invasion resistance.Ecol. Letters 4: 358–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R.H. (1972):Geographical ecology. Patterns in the distribution of species. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R.H. &Connell J.H. (1966):The biology of populations. J. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moora M., Öpik M., Sen R. &Zobel M. (2004): Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities differentially influence the seedling performance of rare and commonPulsatilla species.Funct. Ecol. 18: 554–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet N., Leadley P., Meriguet J. &Loreau M. (2004): Immigration and local competition in herbaceous plant communities: a three-year seed-sowing experiment.Oikos 104: 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D. &Ellenberg H. (1974):Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. J.Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S., Knops J.M.H., Howe K.M., Kennedy T. &Gale S. (2000): Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors.Oikos 91: 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öpik M., Moora M., Liira J., Koljalg U., Zobel M. &Sen R. (2003): Divergent arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities colonize roots ofPulsatilla spp. in boreal Scots pine forest and grassland soils.New Phytol. 160: 581–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pärtel M., Zobel M., Liira J. &Zobel K. (2000): Species richness limitations in productive and oligotrophic plant communities.Oikos 90: 191–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pärtel M., Zobel M., Zobel K. &van der Maarel E. (1996): The species pool and its relation to species richness — evidence from Estonian plant communities.Oikos 75: 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peart D.R. (1989): Species interactions in a successional grassland. I. Seed rain and seedling recruitment.J. Ecol. 77: 236–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petryna L., Moora M., Nunes C.O., Cantero J.J. &Zobel M. (2002): Are invaders disturbance-limited? Conservation of mountain grasslands in Central Argentina.Appl. Veg. Sci. 5: 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S.T.A. &McDonnell M.J. (1989): Seed bank dynamics in temperate deciduous forest. In:Leck M.A., Parker V.T. &Simpson R.L. (eds.),Ecology of soil seed banks, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 123–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds H.L., Packer A., Bever J.D. &Clay K. (2003): Grassroots ecology: plant-microbe-soil interactions as drivers of plant community structure and dynamics.Ecology 84: 2281–2291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D.M., Cowling R.M., Lamont B.B. &Van Hensbergen H.J. (1995): Coexistence ofBanksia species in southwestern Australia: the role of regional and local processes.J. Veg. Sci. 6: 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs R. (1987): Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes.Science 235: 167–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M.L. (1997):Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikkonen K., Faeth S.H., Helander M. &Sullivan T.J. (1998): Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen V. (1987): Relationship between the seed rain and the establishment of vegetation in two areas abandoned after peat harvesting.Holarc. Ecol. 10: 171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen V. &Setälä H. (1992): Plant colonization of bare peat surface — relative importance of seed availability and soil.Ecography 15: 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott G.W. &Hamburg S.P. (1997): The seed rain and seed bank of an adjacent native tallgrass prairie and old field.Canad. J. Bot. 75: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampfli A. &Zeiter M. (1999): Plant species decline due to abandonment of meadows cannot easily be reversed by mowing. A case study from the southern Alps.J. Veg. Sci. 10: 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symstad A.J. (2000): A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility.Ecology 81: 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor D.R., Aarssen L.W. &Loehle C. (1990): On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies.Oikos 58: 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. (1982):Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. (1997): Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity.Ecology 78: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull L.A., Crawley M.J. &Rees M. (2000): Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments.Oikos 88: 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Putten W. (2000): Pathogen-driven forest diversity.Nature 404: 232–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsey B.J. &Polley H.W. (2003): Effects of seed additions and grazing history on diversity and productivity of subhumid grasslands.Ecology 84: 920–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisheu I.C. &Keddy P. (1996): Three competing models for predicting the size of species pools: a test using eastern North American wetlands.Oikos 76: 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong S., Johansson M.E., Hughes F.M.R., Hayes A., Richards K.S. &Nilsson C. (2003): Interactive effects of soil moisture, vegetation canopy, plant litter and seed addition on plant diversity in a wetland community.J. Ecol. 91: 976–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel K. (2001): On the species-pool hypothesis and on the quasi-neutral concept of plant community diversity.Folia Geobot. 36: 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel M. (1992): Plant species coexistence — the role of historical, evolutionary and ecological factors.Oikos 65: 314–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel M. (1997): The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence?Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 266–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel M., Otsus M., Liira J., Moora M. &Möls T. (2000): Is small-scale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability?Ecology 81: 3274–3282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zobel, M., Kalamees, R. Diversity and dispersal — Can the link be approached experimentally?. Folia Geobot 40, 3–11 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803040

Keywords

Navigation