Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of measurements of retained austenite in carburized steels by X-Ray diffraction and quantitative metallography

  • Published:
Journal of Heat Treating

Abstract

The retained austenite contents in carburized samples of EX24, EX32, and SAE 4820 were measured by both X-ray diffraction and automated quantitative metallography. The carburized samples were tempered 1 h at 200 °C prior to determination of the austenite contents. For the metallographic measurements, the specimens were etched in a nital solution which allowed clear distinction among the three principal microconstituents present: retained austenite, bulk martensite, and surface martensite which forms in retained austenite during specimen preparation. It was found that the usefulness of the metallographic procedure was limited to case carbon contents in excess of about 0.6 wt pct. At lower carbon contents, the morphology of the martensite was predominantly nonlenticular, and detection of the austenite in such a matrix was impossible by metallography. Carbon contents in excess of 0.6 wt pt resulted in a predominantly lenticular martensite matrix, so that retained austenite was readily detectable by metallography and good agreement between the X-ray and metallographic measurements was obtained. At high retained austenite contents, it was found that the X-ray measurements tended to detect less retained austenite than was detected by metallography. This was ascribed to the inability of the X-ray technique to differentiate the surface martensite from the bulk martensite. With quantitative metallography, the surface martensite can be distinguished as a separate microconstituent and properly counted as retained austenite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. L. Averbach and M. Cohen:Trans. AIME, 1948, vol. 176, pp. 401–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. L. Averbach, L. S. Castleman, and M. Cohen:Trans. ASM, 1950, vol. 42, pp. 112–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Y. Lai, W. E. Wood, R. A. Clark, V. F. Zackay, and E. R. Parker:Met. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 1663–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. R. Speich and P. R. Swann:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1965, vol. 203, pp. 480–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. Klosterman and W. G. Burgers:Acta Metall., 1964, vol. 12, pp. 355–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. I. H. Schwartz and K. J. Kim:Met. Trans., 1976, vol. 7A, pp. 1567–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. J. Klimek:Met. Eng. Q., February 1975, pp. 55–61.

  8. W. Uhlig, W. Schröter, and G. Schmidt:Neue Hütte, 1970, vol. 15, pp. 22–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C Kim:J. Heat Treat., 1979, vol. 1, pp. 43–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Crank:The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. D. Cullity:Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. R. Speich:Trans. AIME, 1969, vol. 245, pp. 2553–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eldis, G.T. Correlation of measurements of retained austenite in carburized steels by X-Ray diffraction and quantitative metallography. J. Heat Treating 1, 24–30 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02833035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02833035

Keywords

Navigation