Skip to main content
Log in

The integumentary tapetum

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Commonly found in sympetalous plants with unitegmic and tenuinucellate ovules, the integumentary tapetum exhibits great diversity in its distribution, morphology, cytology, differentiation, and behaviour. It is separated from the nucellus and embryo sac by layers of cuticle. The thickness, uniformity and continuity of cuticle is variable not only in diverse taxa but also at different places in the same species. The cuticular layers manifest interruptions, and the embryo sac wall bears certain ingrowths in the regions of these discontinuities. Ultrastructurally, the endothelial cells show characteristics of meristematic as well as secretory cells. Sometimes they develop wall projections and even contain multivesicular bodies. Large quantities of proteins, carbohydrates, ascorbic acid and some enzymes such as oxidative enzymes, amylases, proteases are also known to occur. Besides, a deposition of callose at the onset of pollination is recorded inPetunia. Proliferation of the integumentary tapetum in some hybrids results in seed abortion. It is believed that endothelium helps in coordinating growth in the ovule, channelizes nutrition to the embryo sac, and later performs the protective function.

Résumé

La jacquette qui se trouve souvent dans les plantes sympetalous aux ovules unitegmics et tenuinucellates, exhibe une grande diversité dans sa distribution, morphologie, cytologie, différentiation et comportement. Elle est separée du sac embryonnaire et de la micelle par des couches cuticulaires. L’épaisseur, l’uniformité et la continuité du cuticle varient non seulement dans divers taxa mais aussi dans différents endroits de l’espèce. Les couches cuticulaires sont caracterisées par des interruptions sous lesquelles se trouvent certains plis qui viennent du sac embryonnaire. Ultrastructuralement, les cellules de la jacquette démontrent des caractéristiques méristématiques, et sécréteuses. Parfois ces cellules developpement des projections du mur et possèdent de certains corps multivésiculaires. On a aussi trouvé des protéines, des carbohydrates, de l’acide ascorbique, et des enzymes comme de l’enzyme oxidative, des amylases, des protéases, en grandes quantités. En outre, on a aussi détecté une déposition de callose dans le cas dePetunia, au commencement de pollinisation. La proliferation de la jacquette dans certaines hybrides cause l’avortement de la graine. On pense que la jacquette aide à la coordination de l’accroissement de l’ovule, achemine des substances nutritives au sac embryonnaire, et plus tard sert de fonction protectrice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Agarwal, Savita andS. C. Gupta. 1976. Insoluble polysaccharides inFoeniculum ovules. Curr. Sci. 45: 194–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • -V. M. Rajeswari and S. C. Gupta. 1975. Insoluble polysaccharides in ovules ofLinum (Abstr.), in Proceedings of the Symposium on Form, Structure and Function, 14. Vallabh Vidyanagar.

  • Arekal, G. D. 1963 a. Embryological studies in Canadian representatives of the tribe Rhinantheae, Scrophulariaceae. Can. J. Bot. 41: 267–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963 b. Contribution to the embryology ofChelone glabra L. Phytomorphology 13: 376–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1966. Embryology ofVeronica serpyllifolia. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 64B: 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,S. Rajeshwari andN. S. Rangaswamy. 1971. Contribution to the embryology ofScoparia dulcis L. Bot. Notiser 124: 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andD. Raju. 1964. Female gametophyte ofLinaria ramosissima Wall. Curr. Sci. 33: 591–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balicka-Ivanowska, G. 1899. Contribution à l’étude du sac embryonnaire chez certaines gamopetales. Flora, Jena 86: 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannikova, Victoria P. 1968. Disturbances in embryogenesis in wide tobacco crosses —Nicotiana paniculata ×N. rustica. Bot. Zhur. 53: 628–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, Katherine I. 1955. Seed failure following hybridization between the hexaploidSolanum dimissum and four diploidSolanum species. Am. J. Bot. 42: 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. andE. Oľga. 1973. Ultrastructural aspects of the embryo sac ofJasione montana L. cell walls. Caryologia 25: 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, P. N. 1935. Studies on the female gametophyte in Solanaceae. J. Indian bot. Soc. 14: 133–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari, N. N., F. Bouman andS. Natesh. 1976. Ovule ontogeny and seed coat structure ofScrophularia himalensis Royle. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 95: 535–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, S. P. andB. M. Johri. 1972. Development of angiosperm seeds.In:T. T. Kozlowski (Editor) Seed Biology. 1. Importance, Development and Germination, pp. 77–149. Academic Press Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankovskaya, T. F. and M. V. Mironchak. 1969. Polysaccharides in the ovules of Compositae. Sb. Rab. Mol. Uch. Vses. Selek-Genet. Inst. 155–158.

  • Brink, R. A. andD. C. Cooper. 1941. Incomplete seed failure as a result of somatoplastic sterility. Genetics 26: 487–505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. V. andG. E. Coe. 1951. A study of sterility inHilaria belangeri (Steud.) Nash andHilaria mutica (Bukl.) Benth. Am. J. Bot. 38: 823–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, R. N. andR. C. Sachar. 1957. Effect of some growth substances on fruit development. Phytomorphology 7: 387–397.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. C. andR. A. Brink. 1945. Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races ofLycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Genetics 30: 376–401.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. M. andC. J. Chamberlain. 1903. Morphology of Angiosperms. D. Appleton & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gwenda L. 1962. Embryological studies in the Compositae. 1.Sporogenesis, gametogenesis and embryogeny inCotula australis. Austr. J. Bot. 10: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1966. Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschamps, M. R. 1970. Sur la prèsence de phytoferritine dans l’ovule du Lin,Linum usitatissimum L. Rev. Cytol. et Biol. vég. 33: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, P. K. 1960. Morphology of the endosperm inCaesulia axillaris. Curr. Sci. 29: 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1962. A reinvestigation of endosperm inTridax procumbens L. Curr. Sci. 31: 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1964a. A contribution to the life history ofBidens biternata (Lour.) Merr. and Sherff. (=Bidens pilosa Linn.). J. Indian bot. soc. 43: 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964b. A contribution to the Ufe history ofVolutarella ramosa Roxb. (=Volutarella divaricata Hook. f. et Benth.). J. India bot. Soc. 43: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, Usha. 1976. Part I. Histochemical studies inLinum usitatissimum Linn, andRanunculus sceleratus Linn. — egg to seedling. Part II. Embryology ofCyrilla racemiflora Linn. andClifftonia monophylla (Lam.) Britton ex Sarg, with special reference to the systematic position of the Cyrillaceae. Ph.D. thesis. University of Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diboll, A. G. andD. A. Larson. 1966. An electron microscopic study of the mature megagametophyte inZea mays. Am. J. Bot. 53: 391–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ducamp, L. 1902. Recherches sur l’embryogénie des Araliacées. Ann. Sci. nat. Bot. (8) 15: 311–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engell, K. andG. B. Petersen. 1977. Integumentary and endothelial cells ofBellis perennis. Morphology and histochemistry in relation to the developing embryo sac. Bot. Tidskrift 71: 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, K. 1963. Bildund und abbau von callose in den Samenanlagen derPetunia hybrida. Z. Bot. 51: 32–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eymé, J. 1967. Nouvelles observations sur l’infrastructure de tissues nectarigènes floraux. Le Botaniste 50: 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, N. andF. V. Mercer. 1971. Nectar production inAbutilon. II. Submicroscopic structure of the nectary. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 24: 657–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapathy, P. S. 1970. Clethraceae. Bull. Indian National Sci. Acad. 41:239–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godineau, J. C. 1971. Ultrastructure of the embryo sac ofCrepis tectorum L. after cell formation and fusion of polar nuclei. Ann. Univ. et A.R.E.R.S. 9: 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldflus, M. 1898–1899. Sur la structure et les fonctions de l’assise èpithéliale et des antipodes chez les composées. Jour. de Bot. 12: 374–384; 13: 9–17, 49–59, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guignard, L. 1893. Réchérches sur le développement de la graine et en particulier du tégument seminal. Jour. de Bot. 7: 1–14, 21–34, 57–106, 140–153, 205–214, 241–250, 282–296, 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, B. E. S. andJ. S. Pate. 1974. Transfer cells.In: A. E. Robards (Editor), Dynamic Aspects of Plant Ultrastructure, pp. 441–480. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haccius, Barbara, N. N. Bhandari andG. Hausner. 1974. In vitro transformation of ovules into rudimentary pistils inNicotiana tabacum L. Jour. Exptl. Bot. 25: 695–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, T. D. 1975. The female gametophyte of three species ofGrindelia and ofPrionopsis ciliata (Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 62: 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, C. V. K. 1939 a. Development of the embryo sac and endosperm haustoria in some members of Scrophulariaceae. II.Isoplexis canariensis Lindl. andCelsia coromandeliana Vahl. J. Indian bot. Soc. 18: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1939 b. Development of the embryo sac and endosperm haustoria in some members of Scrophulariaceae. 3.Limnophila heterophylla andStemodia viscosa. J. Indian bot. Soc. 18: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940a. Structure and development of seed inSopubia trifica Ham. J. Indian bot. Soc. 19: 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940b. Development of the embryo sac and endosperm haustoria in some members of Scrophulariaceae. 4.Vandellia hirsuta andV. scabra. J. Indian bot. Soc. 18: 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1941. Development of the embryo sac and endosperm haustoria inTorenia cordifolia andT. hirsuta. Proc. natl. Inst. Sci., India 7: 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942. Development of embryo sac and endosperm haustoria inTetranema mexicana andVerbascum thapsus. Proc. natl. Inst. Sci., India 8: 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, D. A. 1950. Plant Embryology. Waltham, Mass.

  • Joshi, A. C. andJ. Venkateswarlu. 1936. Embryological studies in the Lythraceae III. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 3B: 377–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junell, S. 1962. Embryology ofHebenstreitia, Dischisma, Sutera andZaluzianskya. Acta Hort. Goteb. 25: 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallarackal, J. 1976. Ontogenetical and cytochemical studies on the ovule ofLinaria bipartita. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Delhi.

  • Kapil, R. N. andP. Masand. 1964. Embryology ofHebenstreitia integrifolia Linn. Proc. natl. Inst. Sci., India 32B: 218–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andS. B. Sethi. 1962a. Development of seed inTridax trilobata Hemsl. Phytomorphology 12: 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1962b. Gametogenesis and seed development inAinsliaea aptera DC. Phytomorphology 12: 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andI. K. Vasil. 1963. Ovule.In: P. Maheshwari (Editor), Recent Advances in the Embryology of Angiosperms, pp. 41–47. International Society of Plant Morphologists, Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andS. C. Tiwari. 1978. Embryological investigations and fluorescence microscopy — an assessment of integration. Internat. Rev. Cytol. 53: 291–331.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, Tripat, N. K. Parulekar andM. R. Vijayaraghavan. 1975. Contribution to the embryology ofCelsia coromandeliana Vahl. with a discussion on its affinities withVerbascum thapsus L. Bot. Notiser 128: 438–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R. 1963. The behaviour of integumentary tapetum in the ovules containing degenerating gametophytes inUtricularia flexuosa Vahl. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci., India 33B: 651–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavialle, P. 1912. Réchérches sur la développement de l’ovaire en fruit chez les composées. Ann. Sci. nat. Bot. 9: 39–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari, P. 1950. An Introduction to the Embryology of Angiosperms. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswari Devi, H. andT. Pullaiah. 1976. Embryological investigations in the Melampodinae. I.Melampodium divarication. Phytomorphology 26: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millsaps, V. 1936. The structure and development of the seed ofPaulownia tomentosa. J. Elisha Mitchell Sc. Soc. 56: 140–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, S. 1964. Floral morphology of the family Compositae. II. Development of the seed and fruit inFlavaria rependa. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 77: 290–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. Floral morphology of the family Compositae. III. Embryology ofSiegesbeckia orientalis L. Austr. J. Bot. 13: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan Ram, H. Y. andM. Dyas. 1975. Occurrence of extra-ovarian ovules in sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.) treated with chlorflurenol. Experientia 31: 1278–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagl, W. 1962. Über endopolyploidie, restitutions kernbildung und kernstruckturen im suspensor von angiospermen und einer gymnosperme. Öst. bot. Z. 109: 431–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, N. C. andR. K. Jain. 1956. Floral morphology and embryology ofBalanites roxburghii. Lloydia 19: 269–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayana, L. L. 1970. Geraniaceae. Bull. Indian Natn Sci. Acad. 41: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netolitzky, K. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermen Samen. Borntrager, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, W. 1973a. The development of the embryo sac of sunflowerHelianthus annuus before fertilization. Can. J. Bot. 51: 863–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1973b. The development of the embryo sac of sunflowerHelianthus annuus after fertilization. Can. J. Bot. 51: 879–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andT. A. Steeves. 1971.Helianthus annuus embryogenesis. Embryo sac wall projections before and after fertilization. Bot. Gaz. 132: 367–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oľga, E. 1975. Pre-fertilization development of ovule ofJasione montana L. Phytomorphology 25: 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan, D. 1962. A reinvestigation of the endosperm and endothelium inTridax procumbens L. Phytomorphology 12: 356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plisko, M. A. 1971. An electron microscopic investigation of the characteristic features of megagametogenesis inCalendula officinalis L. Bot. Zhur. 56: 582–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plisko, M. A.. 1974. Ultrastructure of the integument inCalendula officinalis L. in the early period of embryogenesis. Bot. Zhur. 59: 246–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poddubnaya-Arnoldi, V. A., N. V. Zinger andT. P. Petrovskaya-Baranova. 1964. A histochemical investigation of the ovules, embryo sacs and seeds in some angiosperms.In: H. F. Linskens (Editor), Pollen Physiology and Fertilization, pp. 3–7. North-Holland Publ. Comp., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, K. 1974. Studies in the Cruciferae. Gametophytes, structure and development of seed inEruca sativa Mill. J. Indian bot. Soc. 53: 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, K.. 1975. Development and organization of gametophytes in certain species of Cruciferae. Acta Bot. Indica 3: 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, M. A. 1951. The mechanism of nutrition inVigna catjang. New Phytol. 50: 121–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietsema, J. andS. Satina. 1959. Barriers to crossability: Post-fertilization.In: A. G. Avery, S. Satina and J. Rietsema (Editors), Blakeslee: The GenusDatura, pp. 245–262. Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— andA. F. Blakeslee. 1954. On the nature of embryo inhibition in ovular tumors ofDatura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 40: 425–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savchenko, M. E. 1960. Anomalies in the structure of angiosperm ovules. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (Bot. Sci. Sec.) 130: 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1973. Morphology and growth of angiospermous ovule. Bull. Sci. Leningrad 1–112.

  • Schertz, F. M. 1919. Early development of floral organs and embryonic structures ofScrophularia marylandica. Bot. Gaz. 68: 441–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, E. 1906. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scrophulariaceen. Beihefte, bot. Zentbl. 20: 175–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrock, G. F. andB. F. Palser. 1967. Floral development, anatomy, and embryology ofCollinsia heterophylla with some other species ofCollinsia and onTonella tanella. Bot. Gaz. 128: 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souèges, R. 1907. Développement et structure du tégument séminal chez les Solanacées. Ann. Sci. nat. Bot. XII 6: 1–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, K. 1955. Kern und Nucleolenwachstum bei endomitotischer Polyploidisierung. (Ein Beitrag zur karyologischen Anatomie vonPedicularis palustris L.). Planta 45: 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanyam, K. 1953. The nutritional mechanism of embryo sac and embryo in the families Campanulaceae, Lobeliaceae and Stylidiaceae. Mysore Univ. J. 13: 355–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, H. G. 1926. Zytologische-embryologische Solanaceenstudien. 1. Über die Samenentwicklung vonHyoscyamus niger. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 20: 420–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, B. G. L. andK. V. Krishnamurthy. 1970. On the so called endothelium in the monocotyledons. Phytomorphology 20: 262–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takao, S. 1966. Study on the development of the embryo sac inImpatiens balsamina. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 79: 437–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968. A study on the development of embryo sac inImpatiens textori. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 81: 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, R. andK. Watanabe. 1972. Embryological studies inChrysanthemum makinoi and its hybrid crossed with hexaploidCh. japonense. Jour. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., Ser. B, Div. 2 (Botany) 14: 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiagi, B. 1965. Development of the seed and fruit inMelampyrum nemosum L. andM. arvense L. Can. J. Bot. 43: 1511–1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andN. S. Sankhla. 1963. Studies in the family Orobanchaceae — V. Contribution to the embryology ofOrobanche lucorum. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 76: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsinger, N. V. 1958. Seed, its Development and Physiological Characteristics. Moscow.

  • Van Overbeek, J., M. E. Conklin andA. F. Blakeslee. 1941. Chemical stimulation of ovule development and its possible relation to parthenogenesis. Am. J. Bot. 28: 647–656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vazart, J. 1971. Degeneration of a synergid and pollen tube entrance into the embryo sac ofLinum usitatissimum L. Ann. Univ. et A.R.E.R.S. 9: 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazart, Bernard andJacqueline Vazart. 1965. Infrastructure de l’ovule du Lin,Linum usitatissimum L. I. L’assise jaquette ou endothelium. C.r. Acad. Sci., Paris 261: 2927–2930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigfússòn, E. 1970. On polyspermy in the sunflower. Hereditas 64: 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayaraghavan, M. R. andU. Dhar. 1976.Scytopetalum tieghemii — embryologically unexplored taxon and affinities of the family Scytopetalaceae. Phytomorphology 26: 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andS. Ratnaparkhi. 1972. Some aspects of embryology ofAlectra thomsoni. Phytomorphology 22: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Ruth I. 1955. Cytological and embryological studies inSolanum sectiontuberarium Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 82: 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. H. andH. B. Currier. 1965. Callose: lateral movement of assimilates from phloem. Science 150: 1610–1611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, C. L. F. andP. R. Bell. 1968. Features of the ultrastructure of the female gametophyte ofMyosurus minimus. Jour. Ultrastru. Res. 22: 546–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kapil, R.N., Tiwari, S.C. The integumentary tapetum. Bot. Rev 44, 457–490 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860847

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860847

Keywords

Navigation