Abstract
Commonly found in sympetalous plants with unitegmic and tenuinucellate ovules, the integumentary tapetum exhibits great diversity in its distribution, morphology, cytology, differentiation, and behaviour. It is separated from the nucellus and embryo sac by layers of cuticle. The thickness, uniformity and continuity of cuticle is variable not only in diverse taxa but also at different places in the same species. The cuticular layers manifest interruptions, and the embryo sac wall bears certain ingrowths in the regions of these discontinuities. Ultrastructurally, the endothelial cells show characteristics of meristematic as well as secretory cells. Sometimes they develop wall projections and even contain multivesicular bodies. Large quantities of proteins, carbohydrates, ascorbic acid and some enzymes such as oxidative enzymes, amylases, proteases are also known to occur. Besides, a deposition of callose at the onset of pollination is recorded inPetunia. Proliferation of the integumentary tapetum in some hybrids results in seed abortion. It is believed that endothelium helps in coordinating growth in the ovule, channelizes nutrition to the embryo sac, and later performs the protective function.
Résumé
La jacquette qui se trouve souvent dans les plantes sympetalous aux ovules unitegmics et tenuinucellates, exhibe une grande diversité dans sa distribution, morphologie, cytologie, différentiation et comportement. Elle est separée du sac embryonnaire et de la micelle par des couches cuticulaires. L’épaisseur, l’uniformité et la continuité du cuticle varient non seulement dans divers taxa mais aussi dans différents endroits de l’espèce. Les couches cuticulaires sont caracterisées par des interruptions sous lesquelles se trouvent certains plis qui viennent du sac embryonnaire. Ultrastructuralement, les cellules de la jacquette démontrent des caractéristiques méristématiques, et sécréteuses. Parfois ces cellules developpement des projections du mur et possèdent de certains corps multivésiculaires. On a aussi trouvé des protéines, des carbohydrates, de l’acide ascorbique, et des enzymes comme de l’enzyme oxidative, des amylases, des protéases, en grandes quantités. En outre, on a aussi détecté une déposition de callose dans le cas dePetunia, au commencement de pollinisation. La proliferation de la jacquette dans certaines hybrides cause l’avortement de la graine. On pense que la jacquette aide à la coordination de l’accroissement de l’ovule, achemine des substances nutritives au sac embryonnaire, et plus tard sert de fonction protectrice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Agarwal, Savita andS. C. Gupta. 1976. Insoluble polysaccharides inFoeniculum ovules. Curr. Sci. 45: 194–196.
-V. M. Rajeswari and S. C. Gupta. 1975. Insoluble polysaccharides in ovules ofLinum (Abstr.), in Proceedings of the Symposium on Form, Structure and Function, 14. Vallabh Vidyanagar.
Arekal, G. D. 1963 a. Embryological studies in Canadian representatives of the tribe Rhinantheae, Scrophulariaceae. Can. J. Bot. 41: 267–303.
—. 1963 b. Contribution to the embryology ofChelone glabra L. Phytomorphology 13: 376–388.
—. 1966. Embryology ofVeronica serpyllifolia. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 64B: 241–257.
—,S. Rajeshwari andN. S. Rangaswamy. 1971. Contribution to the embryology ofScoparia dulcis L. Bot. Notiser 124: 237–248.
— andD. Raju. 1964. Female gametophyte ofLinaria ramosissima Wall. Curr. Sci. 33: 591–592.
Balicka-Ivanowska, G. 1899. Contribution à l’étude du sac embryonnaire chez certaines gamopetales. Flora, Jena 86: 47–71.
Bannikova, Victoria P. 1968. Disturbances in embryogenesis in wide tobacco crosses —Nicotiana paniculata ×N. rustica. Bot. Zhur. 53: 628–638.
Beamish, Katherine I. 1955. Seed failure following hybridization between the hexaploidSolanum dimissum and four diploidSolanum species. Am. J. Bot. 42: 297–304.
Berger, C. andE. Oľga. 1973. Ultrastructural aspects of the embryo sac ofJasione montana L. cell walls. Caryologia 25: 109–120.
Bhaduri, P. N. 1935. Studies on the female gametophyte in Solanaceae. J. Indian bot. Soc. 14: 133–178.
Bhandari, N. N., F. Bouman andS. Natesh. 1976. Ovule ontogeny and seed coat structure ofScrophularia himalensis Royle. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 95: 535–548.
Bhatnagar, S. P. andB. M. Johri. 1972. Development of angiosperm seeds.In:T. T. Kozlowski (Editor) Seed Biology. 1. Importance, Development and Germination, pp. 77–149. Academic Press Inc. New York.
Blankovskaya, T. F. and M. V. Mironchak. 1969. Polysaccharides in the ovules of Compositae. Sb. Rab. Mol. Uch. Vses. Selek-Genet. Inst. 155–158.
Brink, R. A. andD. C. Cooper. 1941. Incomplete seed failure as a result of somatoplastic sterility. Genetics 26: 487–505.
Brown, W. V. andG. E. Coe. 1951. A study of sterility inHilaria belangeri (Steud.) Nash andHilaria mutica (Bukl.) Benth. Am. J. Bot. 38: 823–830.
Chopra, R. N. andR. C. Sachar. 1957. Effect of some growth substances on fruit development. Phytomorphology 7: 387–397.
Cooper, D. C. andR. A. Brink. 1945. Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races ofLycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Genetics 30: 376–401.
Coulter, J. M. andC. J. Chamberlain. 1903. Morphology of Angiosperms. D. Appleton & Co., New York.
Davis, Gwenda L. 1962. Embryological studies in the Compositae. 1.Sporogenesis, gametogenesis and embryogeny inCotula australis. Austr. J. Bot. 10: 1–12.
— 1966. Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
Deschamps, M. R. 1970. Sur la prèsence de phytoferritine dans l’ovule du Lin,Linum usitatissimum L. Rev. Cytol. et Biol. vég. 33: 101–110.
Deshpande, P. K. 1960. Morphology of the endosperm inCaesulia axillaris. Curr. Sci. 29: 56–57.
— 1962. A reinvestigation of endosperm inTridax procumbens L. Curr. Sci. 31: 113–114.
— 1964a. A contribution to the life history ofBidens biternata (Lour.) Merr. and Sherff. (=Bidens pilosa Linn.). J. Indian bot. soc. 43: 149–157.
—. 1964b. A contribution to the Ufe history ofVolutarella ramosa Roxb. (=Volutarella divaricata Hook. f. et Benth.). J. India bot. Soc. 43: 141–148.
Dhar, Usha. 1976. Part I. Histochemical studies inLinum usitatissimum Linn, andRanunculus sceleratus Linn. — egg to seedling. Part II. Embryology ofCyrilla racemiflora Linn. andClifftonia monophylla (Lam.) Britton ex Sarg, with special reference to the systematic position of the Cyrillaceae. Ph.D. thesis. University of Delhi, India.
Diboll, A. G. andD. A. Larson. 1966. An electron microscopic study of the mature megagametophyte inZea mays. Am. J. Bot. 53: 391–402.
Ducamp, L. 1902. Recherches sur l’embryogénie des Araliacées. Ann. Sci. nat. Bot. (8) 15: 311–402.
Engell, K. andG. B. Petersen. 1977. Integumentary and endothelial cells ofBellis perennis. Morphology and histochemistry in relation to the developing embryo sac. Bot. Tidskrift 71: 237–244.
Esser, K. 1963. Bildund und abbau von callose in den Samenanlagen derPetunia hybrida. Z. Bot. 51: 32–51.
Eymé, J. 1967. Nouvelles observations sur l’infrastructure de tissues nectarigènes floraux. Le Botaniste 50: 169–183.
Findlay, N. andF. V. Mercer. 1971. Nectar production inAbutilon. II. Submicroscopic structure of the nectary. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 24: 657–664.
Ganapathy, P. S. 1970. Clethraceae. Bull. Indian National Sci. Acad. 41:239–240.
Godineau, J. C. 1971. Ultrastructure of the embryo sac ofCrepis tectorum L. after cell formation and fusion of polar nuclei. Ann. Univ. et A.R.E.R.S. 9: 78–88.
Goldflus, M. 1898–1899. Sur la structure et les fonctions de l’assise èpithéliale et des antipodes chez les composées. Jour. de Bot. 12: 374–384; 13: 9–17, 49–59, 87–96.
Guignard, L. 1893. Réchérches sur le développement de la graine et en particulier du tégument seminal. Jour. de Bot. 7: 1–14, 21–34, 57–106, 140–153, 205–214, 241–250, 282–296, 303–311.
Gunning, B. E. S. andJ. S. Pate. 1974. Transfer cells.In: A. E. Robards (Editor), Dynamic Aspects of Plant Ultrastructure, pp. 441–480. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., England.
Haccius, Barbara, N. N. Bhandari andG. Hausner. 1974. In vitro transformation of ovules into rudimentary pistils inNicotiana tabacum L. Jour. Exptl. Bot. 25: 695–704.
Howe, T. D. 1975. The female gametophyte of three species ofGrindelia and ofPrionopsis ciliata (Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 62: 273–279.
Iyengar, C. V. K. 1939 a. Development of the embryo sac and endosperm haustoria in some members of Scrophulariaceae. II.Isoplexis canariensis Lindl. andCelsia coromandeliana Vahl. J. Indian bot. Soc. 18: 13–20.
—. 1939 b. Development of the embryo sac and endosperm haustoria in some members of Scrophulariaceae. 3.Limnophila heterophylla andStemodia viscosa. J. Indian bot. Soc. 18: 35–42.
—. 1940a. Structure and development of seed inSopubia trifica Ham. J. Indian bot. Soc. 19: 251–261.
—. 1940b. Development of the embryo sac and endosperm haustoria in some members of Scrophulariaceae. 4.Vandellia hirsuta andV. scabra. J. Indian bot. Soc. 18: 179–189.
—. 1941. Development of the embryo sac and endosperm haustoria inTorenia cordifolia andT. hirsuta. Proc. natl. Inst. Sci., India 7: 61–71.
—. 1942. Development of embryo sac and endosperm haustoria inTetranema mexicana andVerbascum thapsus. Proc. natl. Inst. Sci., India 8: 59–69.
Johansen, D. A. 1950. Plant Embryology. Waltham, Mass.
Joshi, A. C. andJ. Venkateswarlu. 1936. Embryological studies in the Lythraceae III. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 3B: 377–400.
Junell, S. 1962. Embryology ofHebenstreitia, Dischisma, Sutera andZaluzianskya. Acta Hort. Goteb. 25: 91–101.
Kallarackal, J. 1976. Ontogenetical and cytochemical studies on the ovule ofLinaria bipartita. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Delhi.
Kapil, R. N. andP. Masand. 1964. Embryology ofHebenstreitia integrifolia Linn. Proc. natl. Inst. Sci., India 32B: 218–232.
— andS. B. Sethi. 1962a. Development of seed inTridax trilobata Hemsl. Phytomorphology 12: 235–239.
——. 1962b. Gametogenesis and seed development inAinsliaea aptera DC. Phytomorphology 12: 222–234.
— andI. K. Vasil. 1963. Ovule.In: P. Maheshwari (Editor), Recent Advances in the Embryology of Angiosperms, pp. 41–47. International Society of Plant Morphologists, Delhi.
— andS. C. Tiwari. 1978. Embryological investigations and fluorescence microscopy — an assessment of integration. Internat. Rev. Cytol. 53: 291–331.
Kapoor, Tripat, N. K. Parulekar andM. R. Vijayaraghavan. 1975. Contribution to the embryology ofCelsia coromandeliana Vahl. with a discussion on its affinities withVerbascum thapsus L. Bot. Notiser 128: 438–449.
Khan, R. 1963. The behaviour of integumentary tapetum in the ovules containing degenerating gametophytes inUtricularia flexuosa Vahl. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci., India 33B: 651–655.
Lavialle, P. 1912. Réchérches sur la développement de l’ovaire en fruit chez les composées. Ann. Sci. nat. Bot. 9: 39–141.
Maheshwari, P. 1950. An Introduction to the Embryology of Angiosperms. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.
Maheswari Devi, H. andT. Pullaiah. 1976. Embryological investigations in the Melampodinae. I.Melampodium divarication. Phytomorphology 26: 77–86.
Millsaps, V. 1936. The structure and development of the seed ofPaulownia tomentosa. J. Elisha Mitchell Sc. Soc. 56: 140–164.
Misra, S. 1964. Floral morphology of the family Compositae. II. Development of the seed and fruit inFlavaria rependa. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 77: 290–296.
—. 1965. Floral morphology of the family Compositae. III. Embryology ofSiegesbeckia orientalis L. Austr. J. Bot. 13: 1–10.
Mohan Ram, H. Y. andM. Dyas. 1975. Occurrence of extra-ovarian ovules in sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.) treated with chlorflurenol. Experientia 31: 1278–1279.
Nagl, W. 1962. Über endopolyploidie, restitutions kernbildung und kernstruckturen im suspensor von angiospermen und einer gymnosperme. Öst. bot. Z. 109: 431–494.
Nair, N. C. andR. K. Jain. 1956. Floral morphology and embryology ofBalanites roxburghii. Lloydia 19: 269–279.
Narayana, L. L. 1970. Geraniaceae. Bull. Indian Natn Sci. Acad. 41: 117–120.
Netolitzky, K. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermen Samen. Borntrager, Berlin.
Newcomb, W. 1973a. The development of the embryo sac of sunflowerHelianthus annuus before fertilization. Can. J. Bot. 51: 863–878.
—. 1973b. The development of the embryo sac of sunflowerHelianthus annuus after fertilization. Can. J. Bot. 51: 879–890.
— andT. A. Steeves. 1971.Helianthus annuus embryogenesis. Embryo sac wall projections before and after fertilization. Bot. Gaz. 132: 367–371.
Oľga, E. 1975. Pre-fertilization development of ovule ofJasione montana L. Phytomorphology 25: 76–81.
Padmanabhan, D. 1962. A reinvestigation of the endosperm and endothelium inTridax procumbens L. Phytomorphology 12: 356–361.
Plisko, M. A. 1971. An electron microscopic investigation of the characteristic features of megagametogenesis inCalendula officinalis L. Bot. Zhur. 56: 582–597.
Plisko, M. A.. 1974. Ultrastructure of the integument inCalendula officinalis L. in the early period of embryogenesis. Bot. Zhur. 59: 246–251.
Poddubnaya-Arnoldi, V. A., N. V. Zinger andT. P. Petrovskaya-Baranova. 1964. A histochemical investigation of the ovules, embryo sacs and seeds in some angiosperms.In: H. F. Linskens (Editor), Pollen Physiology and Fertilization, pp. 3–7. North-Holland Publ. Comp., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Prasad, K. 1974. Studies in the Cruciferae. Gametophytes, structure and development of seed inEruca sativa Mill. J. Indian bot. Soc. 53: 24–33.
Prasad, K.. 1975. Development and organization of gametophytes in certain species of Cruciferae. Acta Bot. Indica 3: 147–154.
Rau, M. A. 1951. The mechanism of nutrition inVigna catjang. New Phytol. 50: 121–123.
Rietsema, J. andS. Satina. 1959. Barriers to crossability: Post-fertilization.In: A. G. Avery, S. Satina and J. Rietsema (Editors), Blakeslee: The GenusDatura, pp. 245–262. Ronald Press, New York.
—— andA. F. Blakeslee. 1954. On the nature of embryo inhibition in ovular tumors ofDatura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 40: 425–431.
Savchenko, M. E. 1960. Anomalies in the structure of angiosperm ovules. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (Bot. Sci. Sec.) 130: 15–17.
-. 1973. Morphology and growth of angiospermous ovule. Bull. Sci. Leningrad 1–112.
Schertz, F. M. 1919. Early development of floral organs and embryonic structures ofScrophularia marylandica. Bot. Gaz. 68: 441–450.
Schmid, E. 1906. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scrophulariaceen. Beihefte, bot. Zentbl. 20: 175–299.
Schrock, G. F. andB. F. Palser. 1967. Floral development, anatomy, and embryology ofCollinsia heterophylla with some other species ofCollinsia and onTonella tanella. Bot. Gaz. 128: 83–104.
Souèges, R. 1907. Développement et structure du tégument séminal chez les Solanacées. Ann. Sci. nat. Bot. XII 6: 1–124.
Steffen, K. 1955. Kern und Nucleolenwachstum bei endomitotischer Polyploidisierung. (Ein Beitrag zur karyologischen Anatomie vonPedicularis palustris L.). Planta 45: 379–394.
Subramanyam, K. 1953. The nutritional mechanism of embryo sac and embryo in the families Campanulaceae, Lobeliaceae and Stylidiaceae. Mysore Univ. J. 13: 355–358.
Svensson, H. G. 1926. Zytologische-embryologische Solanaceenstudien. 1. Über die Samenentwicklung vonHyoscyamus niger. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 20: 420–434.
Swamy, B. G. L. andK. V. Krishnamurthy. 1970. On the so called endothelium in the monocotyledons. Phytomorphology 20: 262–269.
Takao, S. 1966. Study on the development of the embryo sac inImpatiens balsamina. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 79: 437–446.
—. 1968. A study on the development of embryo sac inImpatiens textori. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 81: 310–317.
Tanaka, R. andK. Watanabe. 1972. Embryological studies inChrysanthemum makinoi and its hybrid crossed with hexaploidCh. japonense. Jour. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., Ser. B, Div. 2 (Botany) 14: 75–84.
Tiagi, B. 1965. Development of the seed and fruit inMelampyrum nemosum L. andM. arvense L. Can. J. Bot. 43: 1511–1521.
— andN. S. Sankhla. 1963. Studies in the family Orobanchaceae — V. Contribution to the embryology ofOrobanche lucorum. Bot. Mag., Tokyo 76: 81–88.
Tsinger, N. V. 1958. Seed, its Development and Physiological Characteristics. Moscow.
Van Overbeek, J., M. E. Conklin andA. F. Blakeslee. 1941. Chemical stimulation of ovule development and its possible relation to parthenogenesis. Am. J. Bot. 28: 647–656.
Vazart, J. 1971. Degeneration of a synergid and pollen tube entrance into the embryo sac ofLinum usitatissimum L. Ann. Univ. et A.R.E.R.S. 9: 89–97.
Vazart, Bernard andJacqueline Vazart. 1965. Infrastructure de l’ovule du Lin,Linum usitatissimum L. I. L’assise jaquette ou endothelium. C.r. Acad. Sci., Paris 261: 2927–2930.
Vigfússòn, E. 1970. On polyspermy in the sunflower. Hereditas 64: 1–52.
Vijayaraghavan, M. R. andU. Dhar. 1976.Scytopetalum tieghemii — embryologically unexplored taxon and affinities of the family Scytopetalaceae. Phytomorphology 26: 16–22.
— andS. Ratnaparkhi. 1972. Some aspects of embryology ofAlectra thomsoni. Phytomorphology 22: 1–8.
Walker, Ruth I. 1955. Cytological and embryological studies inSolanum sectiontuberarium Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 82: 87–100.
Webster, D. H. andH. B. Currier. 1965. Callose: lateral movement of assimilates from phloem. Science 150: 1610–1611.
Woodcock, C. L. F. andP. R. Bell. 1968. Features of the ultrastructure of the female gametophyte ofMyosurus minimus. Jour. Ultrastru. Res. 22: 546–563.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kapil, R.N., Tiwari, S.C. The integumentary tapetum. Bot. Rev 44, 457–490 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860847
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860847