Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The endosperm in seed development

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Afzelius, K. Apomixis in der Gattung Arnica. Svensk Bot. Tid.30: 572–579. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akerberc, E. Further studies of the embryo- and endosperm development inPoo pratensis. Hereditas29: 199–201. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alderman, W. H. Experimental work on self-sterility in the apple. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.: 94–101. 1917.

  4. Andrew, R. W.et al. Some effects of the waxy and sugary genes on endosperm development in maize. Jour. Agr. Res.69: 355–371. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong, J. M. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. I. Crossing results and description of first generation hybrids. Canad. Jour. Res., C,14: 190–202. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  6. — Investigations inTriticum-Agropyron hybridization. Emp. Jour. Exp. Agr.13: 41–53. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Asplund, E. Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Blüten einiger Valerianaceen. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.61(3). 1920.

  8. Avery, G. S., Jr.et al. Auxin content of maize kernels during ontogeny, from plants of varying heterotic vigor. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 765–772. 1942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beasley, J. O. Hybridization of American 26-chromosome and Asiatic 13-chromosome species ofGosspyium. Jour. Agr. Res.60: 175–182. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berger, C. A. Some criteria for judging the degree of polyploidy of cells in the resting stage. Am. Nat.75: 93–96. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blake, M. A. Some results of crosses of early ripening varieties of peaches. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.37: 232–241. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blakeslee, A. F.et al. Inheritance in tetraploidDaturas. Bot. Gaz.76: 329–373. 1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. — andSatina, S. New hybrids from incompatible crosses inDatura through culture of excised embryos on malt media. Science99: 331–334. 1944.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Böös, G. Neue embryologische Studien überAlchimella arvensis L. Scop. Bot. Not.1924: 209–250. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boyes, J. W. andThompson, W. P. The development of the endosperm and embryo in reciprocal interspecific crosses in cereals. Jour. Genet.34: 203–227. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bradbury, Dorothy. A comparative study of the developing and aborting fruits ofPrunus cerasus. Am. Jour. Bot.16: 525–542. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brink, R. A. Mendelian ratios and the gametophyte generation in angiosperms. Genetics10: 359–394. 1925.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. — andBurnham, C. R. Differential action of the sugary gene in maize on two alternative classes of male gametophytes. Genetics12: 348–378. 1927.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. — andCooper, D. C. Double fertilization and development of the seed in angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.102: 1–25. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. —— Incomplete seed failure as a result of somatoplastic sterility. Genetics26: 487–505. 1941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. —— The antipodals in relation to abnormal endosperm behavior inHordeum jubatum ×Secale cereale hybrid seeds. Genetics29: 391–406. 1944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. —et al. A hybrid betweenHordeum jubatum andSecale cereale reared from an artificially cultivated embryo. Jour. Hered.35: 67–75. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  23. — andMacGillivray, J. H. Segregation for the waxy character in maize pollen and differential development of the male gametophyte. Am. Jour. Bot.11: 465–469. 1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bryant, L. R. A study of the factors affecting the development of the embryo-sac and the embryo in the Mclntosh apple. Univ. N. H. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.61: 1–40. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buch holz, J. T. Embryological aspects of hybrid vigor in pines. Science102: 135–142. 1945.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. — andBlakeslee, A. F. Pollen-tube behavior with reference to sterility inDatura. Mem. Hort. Soc. N. Y.3: 245–260. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  27. —— Pollen-tube growth in crosses between balanced chromosomal types ofDatura stramonium. Genetics14: 538–568. 1929.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Capoor, S. P. Contribution to the morphology of some Indian Liliaceae. II. The gametophytes ofUrginea indica Kunth. Bel. Bot. Centralb.56: 156–170. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Carano, E. Ulteriori osservazioni suEuphorbia dulcis L. in rapporto col suo comportamento apomittico. Annali di Bot.17: 50–79. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chamberlain, C. J. Gymnosperms, structure and evolution. 1935.

  31. Christoff, M. Cytological studies in the genusNicotiana. Genetics13: 233–277. 1928.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Clark, F. J. and Copeland, F. C. Chromosome aberrations in the endosperm of maize. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 247–251. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cleland, R. E. Some aspects of the cyto-genetics ofOenothera. Bot. Rev.2: 316–348. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Collins, G. N. andKempton, J. H. Effects of cross-pollination on the size of seed in maize. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Cir.124: 9–15. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cooper, D. C. Macrosporogenesis and development of the embryo-sac ofLilium Henryi. Bot. Gaz.97: 346–355. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. — Macrosporogenesis and the development of the seed ofPhryma leptostachya. Am. Jour. Bot.28: 755–761. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. — Haploid-diploid twin embryos inLilium andNicotiana. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 408–413. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. — andBrink, R. A. Partial self-incompatibility and the collapse of fertile ovules as factors affecting seed formation in alfalfa. Jour. Agr. Res.60: 453–472. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  39. —— Somatoplastic sterility as a cause of seed failure after interspecific hybridization. Genetics25: 593–617. 1940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. —— Collapse of the seed following the mating ofHordeum jubatum ×Secale cereale. Genetics29: 370–390. 1944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. —— Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races ofLycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Genetics30: 376–401. 1945.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cori, G. T.et al. The mechanism of formation of starch and glycogen. Federation Proc.4: 234–241. 1945.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Correns, C. Untersuchungen über die Xenien beiZea mays. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.17: 410–417. 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Coulter, J. M. The embryo sac and embryo ofGnetum Gnemon. Bot. Gaz.46: 81–97. 1908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. — Relation of megaspores to embryo sacs in angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.45: 361–366. 1908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. — The endosperm of angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.52: 380–385. 1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. -et al. Textbook of botany. 1910.

  48. Chamberlain, C. J. Morphology of gymnosperms. 1917.

  49. — andLand, W. J. G. Gametophytes and embryo ofTorreya taxifolia. Bot. Gaz.39: 161–178. 1905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cummings, J. M. Preliminary report on meiotic chromosomes in newDatura hybrids from embryos excised from incompatible crosses. [Abs.] Genetics30: 3. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dahlgren, K. V. O. Zytologische und embryologische Studien über die Reihen Primulales und Plumbaginales. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.56, No. 4. 1916.

  52. — Notes on the ab initio cellular endosperm. Bot. Not.1923: 1–24. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  53. — Die Embryologie einiger Alismataceae. Svensk Bot. Tid.22: 1–17. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  54. — Zur Embryologie der Saxifragoideen. Svensk Bot. Tid.24: 429–448. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  55. — Die Embryosackentwicklung vonEchinodorus tnacrophyllus undSagittaria sagittifolia. Planta21: 602–612. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. — Die Embryologie vonImpatiens Roylei. Svensk Bot. Tid.28: 103–125. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  57. — Endosperm und Embryobildung beiZostera marina. Bot. Not.1939: 607–615. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Darlington, C. D. Recent advances in cytology. 1932.

  59. Degmen, E. S. andAuchter, E. C. Metaxenia studies with apples. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.31: 213–220. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Demerec, M. A case of pollen dimorphism in maize. Am. Jour. Bot.11: 461–464. 1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. — Cross sterility in maize. Zeit. Ind. Abst. Ver.50: 281–291. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dermen, H. Aposporic parthenogenesis in a triploid apple,Malus hupehensis. Jour. Arn. Arb.17: 90–105. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Detjen, L. R. Physiological dropping of fruits. I. Relation of pollination, fertilization and embryo abortion to abscission in fruits. Del. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.143: 1–47. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dieterich, K. Ueber die Kultur von Embryonen ausserhalb der Samen. Flora17: 379–417. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Dorsey, M. J. A study of sterility in the plum. Genetics4: 417–488. 1919.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. East, E. M. Genetic reactions inNicotiana. I. Compatibility. Genetics20: 403–413. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Edman, G. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der GattungOxyria Hill, nebst zytologischen, embryologischen und systematischen Bemerkungen über einige andere Polygonaceen. Acta Horti Bergiani9: 165–291. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  68. — Apomeiosis und apomixis beiAtraaphaxis frutescens C. Koch. Acta Horti Bergiani11: 13–66. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Emerson, R. A.et al. A summary of linkage studies in maize. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem.180: 1–83. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ernst, A. Embryobildung beiBalanophora. Flora106: 129–159. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Esenbeck, E. andSuessenguth, K. Über die aseptische Kultur pflanzlichen Embryonen, zugleich ein Beitrag zum Nachweis der Enzymausscheidung. Arch. Exp. Zell.1: 547–586. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Fagerlind, F. Embryologische, zytologische und Bestäubungsexperimentelle Studien in der Familie Rubiaceae nebst Bemerkungen über einige Polyploiditätsprobleme. Acta Horti Bergiani11: 195–470. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  73. -. Bau und Entwicklung der Gnetum-gametophyten. Kung. Svenska Vet. Handl. III,19(8). 1941.

  74. — Kompatibilität und Inkompatibilität in der GattungRosa. Acta Horti Bergiani13: 247–302. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Fisher, G. C. Seed development in the genusPeperomia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club41: 137–156, 221–241. 1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Fitting, H. Entwicklungsphysiologische Probleme der Fruchtbildung. Biol. Centralblatt29: 193–206, 225–239. 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Focke, W. Die Pflanzen-mischlinge. 1881.

  78. Friesendahl, A. Cytologische und entwicklungsgeschichte Studien überMyricaria germanica Desv. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.48(7). 1912.

  79. Frost, H. B. Polyembryony, heterozygosis and chimeras inCitrus. Hilgardia1: 365–402. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Frye, T. C. A morphological study of certain Asclepiadaceae. Bot. Gaz.34: 389–413. 1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Gaines, E. F. andAase, H. C. A haploid wheat plant. Am. Jour. Bot.13: 373–385. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Gentcheff, G. andGustafsson, A. Parthenogenesis and pseudogamy inPotentilla. Bot. Not.1940: 109–132. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Goebel, K. Organographie der Pflanzen. Dritten Teil: 1379–2078. 1933.

  84. Griffee, F. Comparative vigor of F1 wheat crosses and their parents. Jour. Agr. Res.22: 53–63. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Guignard, L. Note sur l’origine et la structure du tégument séminal chez les Capparidées, Resedacées, Hypericacées, Balsaminées et Linacées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, II,40: 56–59. 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  86. — Sur les anthérozoides et la double copulation sexuelle chez les végétaux angiospermes. Cotnp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris128: 864–871. 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  87. — La double fécondation dans leNajas major. Jour, de Bot.15: 205–213. 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Gustafsson, A. Castrierung und Pseudogamie in der GattungRubus. Bot Not.1930: 477–494. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  89. — Sind dieconina-Rosen apomiktisch? Bot. Not.1931: 21–30. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Gustafson, F. G. Parthenocarpy: natural and artificial. Bot. Rev.8: 599–654. 1942.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Haagen-Smit, A. J. et al. A method for the culturing of excised, immature corn embryos in vitro. Science101: 234. 1945.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Haberlandt, G. Wundhormone als Erreger von Zellteilungen. Beitr. Allg. Bot.2: 1–53. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Håkansson, A. Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Umbelliferen. Lunds Univ. Arsskr. N. F. Afd. 2,18, No. 7. 1923.

  94. — Die Entwicklung des Embryosacks und die Befruchtung beiPoa alpina. Hereditas29: 25–61. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  95. — Ergänzende Beiträge zur Embryologie vonPoa alpina. Bot. Not.1944: 299–311. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Hall, J. G. An embryological study ofLimnocharis emarginata. Bot. Gaz.33: 214–219. 1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Hannig, E. Ueber die Kultur von Cruciferen Embryonen ausserhalb des Embryosacks. Bot. Zeit.62: 45–80. 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Harrison, G. J. Metaxenia in cotton. Jour. Agr. Res.42: 521–544. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Harrold, T. J. Comparative study of the developing and aborting fruits ofPrunus persica. Bot. Gaz.96: 505–520. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Hassid, W. Z. Recent advances in the molecular constitution of starch and glycogen. Federation Proc.4: 227–234. 1945.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Hatcher, E. S. J. andGregory, F. G. Auxin production during development of the grain of cereals. Nature148: 626. 1941.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Heinicke, A. J. Factors influencing the abscission of flowers and partially developed fruits of the apple (Pyrus malus L.). Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.393: 43–114. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Hiorth, G. Zur Kenntnis der Homozygoten-Eliminierung und der Pollenschlauchkonkurrenz beiOenothera. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.43: 171–237. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Hollingshead, Lillian. A lethal factor inCrepis effective only in an interspecific hybrid. Genetics15: 114–140. 1930.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Holmgren, J. Zytologische Studien über die Fortpflanzung bei den GattungenErigeron undEupatorium. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.59(7): 1–117. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Janaki-Ammal, E. K. Intergeneric hybrids ofSaccharum. Jour. Genet.41: 217–253. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Johansen, D. A. Morphology and embryology ofFouquieria. Am. Jour. Bot.23: 95–99. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Johnson, D. S. On the endosperm and embryo ofPeperomia pellucida. Bot. Gaz.30: 1–11. 1900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. — On the development ofSaururus cernuus L. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club27: 365–372. 1900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Johri, B. M. Studies in the family Alismaceae. I.Limnophyton obtusijolium Mig. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.14: 49–66. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Jones, D. F. Heritable characters of maize. IV. A lethal factor- Defective seeds. Jour. Hered.11: 161–167. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  112. — Somatic segregation. Bot. Rev.7: 291–307. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Jörgensen, C. A. Studies on Callitrichaceae. Svensk Bot. Tid.38: 81–126. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  114. — Zur Frage der systematischen Stellung der Callitrichaceen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.64: 440–442. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  115. — The experimental formation of heteroploid plants in the genusSolatium. Jour. Genet.19: 133–211. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Joshi, A. C. Morphology ofTinospora cordifolia with some observations on the origin of single integument, nature of synergidae and affinities of the Menispermaceae. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 433–439. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. — andKajale, L. B. Fertilization and seed development in Amarantaceae. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.5: 91–100. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  118. — andRama Rao, V. The embryology ofGisekia pharnaceoides L. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.3: 71–92. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Jost, L. Über die Selbststerilitat einiger Blüten. Bot. Zeit.65: 77–117. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Juel, H. O. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über typische und parthenogenetische Fortpflanzung bei der GattungAntennaria. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.33(5): 1–59. 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Junell, S. Die Samenentwicklung bei einigen Labiaten. Svensk Bot. Tid.31: 67–110. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Kajale, L. B. Embryo and seed development in the Nyctaginaceae. I. Studies in the genusBoerhaavia. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.17: 243–254. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Karpechenko, G. D. Polyploid hybrids ofRaphanus sativus L. ×Brassica oleracea L. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.48: 1–85. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Katayama, Y. Crossing experiments in certain cereals with special reference to different compatibility between the reciprocal crosses. Mem. Coll. Agr. Kyoto Imp. Univ. No.27 (Genetic Ser. No. 2): 1–75. 1933.

  125. — Haploid formation by x-rays inTriticum monococcum. Cytologia5: 235–237. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Kempton, J. H. andMcLane, J. W. Hybrid vigor and weight of germs in the seeds of maize. Jour. Agr. Res.64: 65–80. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Kerr, E. A. Seed development in pseudogamous and syngamous blackberries. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Wis. 1944.

  128. Kiesselbach, T. A. The immediate effect of gametic relationship and of parental type upon the kernel weight of corn. Nebr. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul.33: 1–69. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Kihara, H. Formation of haploids by means of delayed pollination inTriticum monococcum. Bot. Mag. Tokyo54: 178–185. 1940. [Jap., Eng. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  130. — andNishiyama, I. Different compatibility in reciprocal crosses ofAvena, with special reference to tetraploid hybrids between hexaploid and diploid species. Jap. Jour. Bot.6: 245–305. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  131. - andYamashita, K. Künstliche Erzeugung haploides und triploides Einkornweizen durch Bestäubung mit röntgenbestrahlten Pollen. Commemoration Papers on Agron. prepared in honor of Prof. Akemine. 1938. [Jap., Ger. sum.]

  132. Kostoff, D. Ontogeny, genetics, and cytology ofNicotiana hybrids. Genetica12: 33–118. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Kraus, E. J. The self-sterility problem. Jour. Hered.6: 549–557. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Krumbholz, G. Untersuchungen über das Vorkommen von Xenien und Metaxenien bei Aepfeln. Gartenbauwiss.6: 404–424. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Laibach, F. Das Taubwerden von Bastardsamen und die künstliche Aufzucht früh absterbender Bastardembryonen. Zeits. Bot.17: 417–459. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  136. — Ectogenesis in plants. Jour. Hered.20: 201–208. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  137. — Kreuzungsschwierigkeiten bei Pflanzen und die Möglichkeiten ihrer Behebung. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.48: 58–77. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Lammerts, W. E. Embryo culture an effective technique for shortening the breeding cycle of deciduous trees and increasing germination of hybrid seed. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 166–171. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Land, W. J. G. A morphological study ofThuja. Bot. Gaz.34: 249–259. 1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Landes, Margaret. The causes of self-sterility in rye. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 567–571. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Langlet, O. F. Über die Entwicklung des Eiappartes im Embryosack der Angiospermen. Svensk Bot. Tid.21: 478–485. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  142. La Rue, C. D. The growth of plant embryos in culture. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club63: 365–382. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. — Tissue cultures of spermatophytes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.22: 201–209. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. — andAvery, G. S., Jr. The development of the embryoZizania aquatica in the seed and in artificial culture. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club65: 11–21. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Ledingham, G. F. Cytological and developmental studies of hybrids betweenMedicago sativa and a diploid form ofM. falcata. Genetics25: 1–15. 1940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Lewis, C. T. andVincent, C. C. Pollination of the apple. Ore. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.104: 5–40. 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Lidforss, B. Resumé seiner Arbeiten überRubus. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.12: 1–13. 1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Lindstrom, E. W. Heritable characters of maize. XIII. Endosperm defects-sweet defective and flint defective. Jour. Hered.14: 126–135. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Longley, A. E. Chromosomes in maize and maize relatives. Jour. Agr. Res.28: 673–682. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Lowig, E. Beiträge zu Sterilitätsfragen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung einer “guter Arten”, wieSecale montanum Güss. und verschiedenerIris. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.123: 62–103. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  151. McClintock, Barbara. The stability of broken ends of chromosomes inZea mays. Genetics26: 234–282. 1941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. McDonald, C. C. A study of seed development in three species ofErigeron with special reference to apogamy. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club54: 479–497. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. McLean, S. W. New hybrids with the aberrant species,Datura ceratocaulla, secured by embryo dissection. [Abs.] Genetics30: 14–15. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  154. Maheshwari, P. A critical review of the types of embryo-sacs in angiosperms. New Phytol.36: 359–417. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. — Recent work on the types of embryo-sacs in angiospermsa critical review. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.20: 229–261. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  156. — The mode of endosperm formation inVallisneria, Ottelia andLimnocharis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (India)13: 260–263. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  157. — andJohri, B. M. The embryo sac ofAcalypha indica L. Bei. bot. Centrlb.61A: 125–136. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  158. — andSingh, B. Studies in the family Alismaceae. V. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. (India)9: 311–322. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Mangelsdorf, P. C. The genetics and morphology of some endosperm characters in maize. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.279: 513–614. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Mauritzon, J. Beitrag zur Embryologie der Crassulaceen. Bot. Not.1930: 233–250. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Maheshwari, P. Studien über die Embryologie der Familien Crassulaceae und Saxifragaceae. Akad. Abh. Lund: 1–152. 1933.

  162. — Die Endosperm- und Embryo-entwicklung einiger Acanthaceen. Lunds Univ. Arsskr. N.F. Avd. 2,30: 3–42. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  163. — Ein Beitrag zur Embryologie der Phytolaccaceen und Cactaceen. Bot. Not.1934: 111–135. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  164. — Die Embryologie einiger Capparidaceen sowie vonTovaria pendulo. Ark. Bot.26A(15): 1–14. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  165. — Etwas über die Embryologie der Bignoniaceen. Bot. Not.1935: 60–77. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  166. -. Samenbau und Embryologie einiger Scitamineen. Lunds Univ. Arsskr.31(9). 1936.

  167. Merry, J. Studies on the embryo ofHordeum sativum. II. The growth of the embryo in culture. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club69: 360–372. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Michaelis, P. Zur Cytologie und Embryoentwicklung vonEpilobium. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.43: 61–67. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  169. Modilewski, J. Neue Beiträge zur Polyembryonie vonAllium odorum. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.48: 285–294. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  170. de Mol, W. Nucleolar number and size in diptoid, triploid and aneuploid hyacinths. La Cellule38: 7–65. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  171. Muir, R. M. Growth hormones as related to the setting and development of fruit inNicotiana tabacum. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 716–720. 1942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Müller-Thurgau, H. Abhängigkeit der Ausbildung der Traubenbeeren und einiger anderer Früchte von der Entwicklung der Samen. Landw. Jahb. Schweiz12: 135–205. 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  173. Müntzing, A. Pseudogamie in der GattungPotentilla. Hereditas11: 267–283. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  174. — Über Chromosomenvermehrung inGaleopsis-Kreuzungen und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung. Hereditas14: 153–172. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  175. — Outlines to a genetic monograph of the genusGaleopsis. Hereditas13: 185–341. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  176. — Note on the cytology of some apomicticPotentilla species. Hereditas15: 166–178. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  177. — Hybrid incompatibility and the origin of polyploidy. Hereditas18: 33–55. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. — Aneuploidy and seed shrivelling in tetraploid rye. Hereditas29: 65–75. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  179. — and G. Some new results concerning apomixis, sexuality and polymorphism inPotentilla. Bot. Not.1941: 237–278. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  180. — Spontaneous changes in chromosome number in apomicticPotentilla collina. Hereditas29: 451–460. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Murbeck, Sv. Parthenogenetische Embryobildung in der GattungAlchimella. Lunds Uniy. Arsskr. 36, Avd.2, No. 7. 1901.

  182. Murneek, A. E. Pollination and fruit setting. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.379: 1–28. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Narashima Murthy, S. K. Cytological and morphological studies inLimnophyton obtusifolium Mig. Half-yr. Jour. Mysore Univ.7: 1–32. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  184. Nast, C. G. The embryogeny and seedling anatomy ofJugions regia L. Lilloa6: 163–205. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Nawaschin, S. Resultate einer Revision des Befruchtungsyorgangs beiLilium Martagon undFritillaria tenella. Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Pet.9: 377–382. 1898. [Bot. Centralb. 77: 62. 1899].

    Google Scholar 

  186. Nebel, B. R. Metaxenia in apples. Jour. Hered.27: 345–349. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Newman, I. V. Studies in the Australian Acacias. IV. Proc. Linnean Soc. N.S. Wales56: 277–313. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  188. Nicolaisen, W. Über quantitative Xenien bei Roggen und Erbsen. Zeits. Züchtung, Reihe A, Pflanzenzucht17: 265–276. 1931-32.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Nielsen, E. L. Cytology and breeding behavior of selected plants ofPoa pratensis. Bot. Gaz.106: 357–382. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Nixon, R. W. The immediate influence of pollen on the size and time of ripening of the fruit of the date palm. Jour. Hered.19: 240–254. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  191. Noack, K. L. ÜberHypericum Kreuzungen. VI. Fortpflanzungsverhältnisse und Bastarde vonHypericum perforatum L. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.76: 569–601. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Olmo, H. P. Empty-seededness in varieties ofVitis vinifera. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.32: 376–380. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Pace, L. Apogamy inAtamosco. Bot. Gaz.56: 376–394. 1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Paddich, M. E. andSprague, H. B. Maize seed characters in relation to hybrid vigor. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.31: 743–750. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  195. Pearson, H. M. Parthenocarpy and seed abortion inVitis vinifera. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.29: 169–175. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  196. — Parthenocarpy and seedlessness inVitis vinifera. Science76: 594. 1932.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. Porsch, O. Versuch einer phylogenetischen Erklärung des Embryosackes und der doppelten Befruchtung der Angiospermen. 1907.

  198. — Versuch einer Phylogenie des Embryosackes und der doppelten Befruchtung der Angiospermen. Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien1907: 120–134. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  199. Quincke, F. L. Interspecific and intergeneric crosses withHordeum. Canad. Jour: Res., C,18: 372–373. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  200. Raghavan, T. S. Studies in the Capparidaceae. I. The life history ofCleome Chelidonii Linn. Fil. Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot.51: 43–72. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  201. Randolph, L. F. Cytogenetics of tetraploid maize. Jour. Agr. Res.50: 591–605. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  202. — Developmental morphology of the caryopsis of maize. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 881–916. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  203. — Embryo culture ofIris seed. Bull. Am. Iris Soc.97: 33–45. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  204. — andCox, L. G. Factors influencing the germination ofIris seed and the relation of inhibiting substances to embryo dormancy. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.43: 284–300. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  205. Rangasamy, K. Contribution to the life history ofVallisneria spiralis. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.13: 129–148. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  206. Redinger, K. Über die Entstehung diploider Embryonen aus unbefruchteten, mit gattungsfremden Pollen bestäubten Samenanlagen beiPetunia nyctaginiflora. Biol. Zentralbl.58: 142–151. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  207. Renner, O. Befruchtung und Embryobildung beiOenothera Lamarckiana und einigen verwandten Arten. Flora107: 115–151. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  208. Robbins, W. W. andBorthwick, H. A. Development of the seed ofAsparagus officinalis. Bot. Gaz.80: 426–438. 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Roberts, R. H. Apple physiology. Growth, composition, and fruiting responses in apple trees. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.68: 1–72. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  210. Rocén, Th. Zur Embryologie der Centrospermen. Diss., Uppsala. 1927.

  211. Samuelsson, G. Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte einigerBicornes-Typen. Svensk Bot. Tid.7: 97–188. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  212. Sansome, E. R.et al. Disintegration of ovules in tetraploid-diploid and in incompatible species crosses inDatura. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club69: 405–420. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  213. Satina, S. andBlakeslee, A. F. Fertilization in the incompatible crossDatura stramonium ×D metel. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club62: 301–312. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  214. —et al. Chromosome behavior in triploidDatura. III. The seed. Am. Jour. Bot.25: 595–602. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  215. Sawyer, M. L. CrossingIris pseudacorus andI. versicolor. Bot. Gaz.79: 60–72. 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  216. Schnarf, K. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Samenentwicklung der Labiaten. Denks. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Math.-Nat. Kl.94: 211–275. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  217. -. Embryologie der Angiospermen. 1929.

  218. -. Vergleichende Embryologie der Angiospermen. 1931.

  219. — Contemporary understanding of embryo-sac development among angiosperms. Bot. Rev.2: 565–585. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  220. Schreiner, E. J. andDuffield, J. W. Metaxenia in an oak species cross. Jour. Hered.33: 97–98. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  221. Schürhoff, P. N. Zur Phylogenie des Angiospermen-Embryosackes. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.37: 160–168. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  222. — Zur Apogamie vonCalycanthus. Flora116: 73–84. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  223. -. Die Zytologie der Blutenpflanzen. 1926.

  224. Sears, E. R. Inviability of intergeneric hybrids involvingTriticum monocoecum andT. aegilopoides. Genetics29: 113–127. 1944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  225. Shoemaker, D. N. On the development ofHamamelis virginiana. Bot. Gaz.39: 245–266. 1905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  226. Skirm, G. W. Embryo culturing as an aid to plant breeding. Jour. Hered.33: 210–215. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  227. Skovsted, A. Cytological studies in cotton. III. A hybrid betweenGossypium Davidsonii Kell. andG. Sturtii F. Muell. Jour. Genet.30: 397–405. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  228. Smith, D. C. Intergeneric hybridization of cereals and other grasses. Jour. Agr. Res.64: 33–47. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  229. Smith, W. K. Propagation of chlorophyll-deficient sweetclover hybrids as grafts. Jour. Hered.34: 135–140. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  230. Söderberg, E. Bemerkungen zur Nomenklatur der parthenogenetischenErigeron-Arten. Svensk Bot. Tid.23: 261–262. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  231. Sprague, G. F. Heterofertilization in maize. Science69: 526–527. 1929.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  232. — The nature and extent of hetero-fertilization in maize. Genetics17: 358–368. 1932.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  233. — Pollen tube establishment and the deficiency of waxy seeds in certain maize crosses. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.19: 838–841. 1933.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  234. — Hybrid vigor and growth rates in a maize cross and its reciprocal. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 819–830. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  235. Stadler, L. J. The comparison of ultraviolet and x-ray effects on mutation. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.9: 168–178. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  236. Stebbins, G. L., Jr. Cytology ofAntennaria. II. Parthenogenetic species. Bot. Gaz.94: 322–345. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  237. —. Apomixis in the angiosperms. Bot. Rev.7: 507–542. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  238. Stenar, H. Embryologische Studien. I. Zur Embryologie einiger Columniferen. II. Die Embryologie der Amaryllidaceen. Akad. Abh. Uppsala. 1925.

  239. Stephens, S. G. Colchicine-produced polyploids inGossypium. I. An autotetraploid Asiatic cotton and certain of its hybrids with wild diploid species. Jour. Genet.44: 272–295. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  240. Stork, H. E. Studies in the genusTaraxacum. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club47: 199–210. 1920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  241. Stout, A. B. Seedlessness in grapes. N. Y. State Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul.238: 1–68. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  242. Sturtevant, A. H. Renner’s studies on the genetics ofOenothera. Quart. Rev. Biol.1: 283–288. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  243. Svenson, H. G. Embryologien hosLycopsis arvensis. Svensk Bot. Tid.16: 137–138. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  244. -. Zur Embryologie der Hydrophyllaceen, Boraginaceen und Heliotropiaceen. Uppsala, Univ. Ars. Mat. Nat.2. 1925.

  245. Swingle, W. T. Metaxenia or the influence of the male parent on the tissues of the mother plant outside of the embryo and endosperm, especially as exemplified in the date palm. 3rd Pan Pacific Sci. Cong. (1926) Proc. I: 1164–1165 [Tokyo, 1928]. 1928.

  246. Täckholm, G. Zytologische Studien über die GattungRosa. Acta Horti Bergiani7: 97–381. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  247. Thompson, W. P. Shrivelled endosperm in species crosses in wheat, its cytological causes and genetical effects. Genetics15: 99–113. 1930

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  248. — Causes of difference in success of reciprocal interspecific crosses. Amer. Nat.64: 407–421. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  249. — The causes of hybrid sterility and incompatibility. Trans. Royal Soc. Canada34: 1–13. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  250. — andCameron, D. R. Chromosome numbers in functioning germ cells of species-hybrids in wheat. Genetics13: 456–469. 1928.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  251. — andJohnston, D. The cause of incompatibility between barley and rye. Canad. Jour. Res., C,23: 1–15. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  252. Tournois, J. Formations d’embryons chéz le Houblon par l’action du pollen du Chanvre. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris153: 1160. 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  253. — Études sur la sexualité du Houblon. Ann. Sci. Nat.19: 49. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  254. Tukey, H. B. Embryo abortion in early-ripening varieties ofPrunus avium. Bot. Gaz.94: 433–468. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  255. — Growth of the peach embryo in relation to growth of fruit and season of ripening. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.30: 209–218. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  256. — Artificial culture of sweet cherry embryos. Jour. Hered.24: 1–12. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  257. — Growth patterns of plants developed from immature embryos in artificial culture. Bot. Gaz.99: 630–665. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  258. — andLee, A. Embryo abortion in the peach in relation to chemical composition and season of fruit ripening. Bot. Gaz.98: 586–597. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  259. Van Overbeek, J. Hormonal control of embryo and seedling. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.10: 126–133. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  260. —et al. Chemical stimulation of ovule development and its possible relation to parthenogenesis. Am. Jour. Bot.28: 647–656. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  261. —et al. Factors in coconut milk essential for growth and development of very youngDatura embryos. Science94: 350–351. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  262. —et al. Cultivation in vitro of smallDatura embryos. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 472–477. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  263. —et al. Factors affecting the growth ofDatura embryos in vitro. Am. Jour. Bot.31: 219–224. 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  264. de Vries, H. Sur la fécondation hybride de l’albumen. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris129: 973–975. 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  265. Waite, M. B. The pollination of pear flowers. U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Path., Bul.5: 1–110. 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  266. Wakakuwa, Sh. Embryological studies on the different seed-development in reciprocal interspecific crosses of wheat. Jap. Jour. Bot.7: 151–185. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Watkins, A. E. Genetic and cytological studies in wheat. III. Jour. Genet.18: 375–396. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  268. — Hybrid sterility and incompatibility. Jour. Genet.25: 125–162. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  269. Weatherwax, P. A rare carbohydrate in waxy maize. Genetics7: 568–572. 1922.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  270. Webber, H. J. Xenia, or the immediate effect of pollen in maize. U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Phys. & Path., Bul.22: 1–44. 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  271. Webber, J. M. Polyembryony. Bot. Rev.6: 575–598. 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  272. Werckmeister, P. Über Herstellung und künstliche Aufzucht von Bastarden der GattungIris. Gartenbauwiss.10: 500–520. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  273. Wexelsen, H. Studies on fertility, inbreeding, and heterosis in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Skr. Norsk. Videnshaps. Akad. Oslo, I. Math.-Nat. Kl.,1945, No. 1: 1–141. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  274. White, P. R. Potentially unlimited growth of excised tomato root tips in a liquid medium. Pl. Physiol.9: 585–600. 1934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  275. — Controlled differentiation in a plant tissue culture. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club66: 507–513. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  276. -White, P. R. A handbook of plant tissue culture. 1943.

  277. Wilson, J. K. Calcium-hypochlorite as a seed sterilizer. Am. Jour. Bot.2: 420–427. 1915.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  278. Winge, ø. The chromosomes. Their numbers and general importance. Compt. Rend. Lab. Carlsberg13: 131–275. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  279. Winkler, H. Über Parthenogenesis und Apogamie im Pflanzenreich. Prog. Rei Bot.2: 293–454. 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  280. Wipf, Louise, andCooper, D. C. Chromosome numbers in nodules and roots of red clover, common vetch and garden pea. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.24: 87–91. 1938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  281. Wittwer, S. H. Growth hormone production during sexual reproduction of higher plants. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul.371. 1943.

  282. Woodcock, E. F. Seed studies in Nyctaginaceae. Papers Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts, Letters9: 495–502. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  283. Wylie, R. B. The morphology ofElodea canadensis. Bot. Gaz.37: 1–22. 1904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin, USA

    R. A. Brink & D. C. Cooper

Authors
  1. R. A. Brink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. C. Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brink, R.A., Cooper, D.C. The endosperm in seed development. Bot. Rev 13, 479–541 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861549

Keywords

Search

Navigation