Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrocarbon-and rubber-producing crops

Evaluation of 100 U.S. plant species

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural production of rubber and other hydrocarbons in the United States may be compatible with increased food and fiber production if entire plants are harvested and processed for fiber, protein, and carbohydrate as well. Thus, procedures and criteria have been established for the preliminary evaluation of plant species as potential multi-use hydrocarbon-producing crops. Previously, 106 species representing 44 families and 81 genera were evaluated. Now an additional 100 species representing 13 additional families and 60 additional genera have been evaluated, and some of these species also offer promise as future crops. Several Labiatae are high in natural rubber (NR) content;Pycnanthemum incanum (Mountain Mint) andTeucrium canadense (American Germander) were evaluated as promising species. Three Compositae,Cacalia atriplicifolia (Pale Indian-Plant),Solidago graminifolia (Grass-leafed Golden-rod), andSolidago rigida (Stiff Goldenrod) were also evaluated as promising species for NR.Campanula americana (Tall Bellflower, Campanulaceae) has potential as a source of both oil and NR.Euphorbia dentata (Euphorbiaceae ) does not produce NR but is very high in protein and oil contents.Sassafras albidum (Sassafras, Lauraceae ) is of interest for its rapid growth rate in combination with a high oil content. A few other species offer some promise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. R. A. Buchanan, D. M. Cull, F. H. Otey, and C. R. Russell. “Hydrocarbon and Rubber-Producing Crops: Evaluation of U.S. Plant Species.” Presented at the 110th meeting of the Rubber Division, American Chemical Society, San Francisco, California, October 5–8, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melvin Calvin. “Hydrocarbons via Photosynthesis.” Presented af the 110th meeting of the Rubber Division, American Chemical Society, San Francisco, California, October 5–8, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. William J. Jewell (Ed.). “Energy Agriculture, and Waste Management: Proceedings of the 1975 Cornell Agricultural Waste Management Conference.” Ann Arbor Science Publications, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  4. Wendel W. Waterman and Donald L. Klass. “Biomass as a Long Range Source of Hydrocarbons.” Presented at the 110th meeting of the Rubber Division, American Chemical Society, San Francisco, California, October 5–8, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Energy from short-rotation forestry evaluated. 1976.Chem. Eng. News 54(51): 35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Polhamus, L. G. “Plants Collected and Tested by Thomas A. Edison as Possible Sources of Domestic Rubber.” ARS 34–74, U.S. Department of Agriculture, July 1967.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchanan, R.A., Cull, I.M., Otey, F.H. et al. Hydrocarbon-and rubber-producing crops. Econ Bot 32, 146–153 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866868

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866868

Keywords

Navigation