Skip to main content
Log in

Content analysis via concept elaboration theory

  • Excellence in Instructional Development
  • Published:
Journal of instructional development

Summary

This presentation has been necessarily brief. Adequate instruction in the use of elaboration theory as in preparing a learning hierarchy requires considerable practice and can hardly be adequately taught in a short paper. Nevertheless, we have suggested that as used in instructional development for sequencing subject matter content learning hierarchies are a useful step in analysis of component skills but may not provide sufficient synthesis for sequencing instruction in complex interrelated procedures and principles. Concept elaboration theory has been suggested as a more adequate design tool for structuring, sequencing and determining presentation strategies for such complex subject matter. The premise of elaboration theory is that the underlying principle should be taught first accompanied by the simplest complete procedure. This initial presentation of theepitome should then be elaborated with an alternating sequence of segregated and integrated presentations which enable the student to learn the component concepts and to put them together in integrated practice. Each cycle of elaboration introduces more complexity until the student has acquired the terminal procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Gagné, Robert M. Contributions of learning theory to human development.Psychological Review, 1968a, 75, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, Robert M. Learning hierarchies. 1968b, 6,Educational Psychologist, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. David. Content and instructional analysis for cognitive transfer tasks.A V Communication Review, 1973, 21, 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. and Boutwell, R. C. Instructional development: Methodology and research. In F. N. Kerlinger (Ed.)Review of Research in Education Vol. 1, Itasca, NY: Peacock, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. David, Richards, Robert E., Schmidt, Renata V., and Wood, Norman D.The Instructional Strategy Diagnostic Profile Training Manual. San Diego: Courseware Inc., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. and Tennyson, R. D.Teaching Concepts: An Instructional Design Guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. David and Wood, Norman D. Instructional strategies: A preliminary taxonomy.Mathematics Education Report. ERIC for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. Ohio State University, 1974.

  • Merrill, M. David and Wood, Norman D. Instructional strategies: A preliminary taxonomy. Rev. ed.Courseware Technical Report No. 1R. San Diego: Courseware Inc., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merrill, M.D. Content analysis via concept elaboration theory. Journal of Instructional Development 1, 10–13 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02904309

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02904309

Keywords

Navigation