Skip to main content
Log in

Instructional analysis

The missing link between task analysis and objectives

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of instructional development

Abstract

In the design of industrial instruction, it is important to maximize learning and transfer to job performance, while minimizing learning time. Both task analysis and instructional analysis are essential processes for achieving these goals. Task analysis is a tool for understanding and specifying the desired final performance or job. The product of task analysis may be a task list, flowchart, and/or other documentation which describes competent performance. Instructional analysis, as distinct from task analysis, identifies the type(s) of learning involved in acquiring a new performance capability and the structure of that learning in terms of component skills and their relationships. The product of the instructional analysis process is a learning map.

This paper describes the rationale for distinguishing between task analysis and instructional analysis, the contributions that both processes make to the design of instruction, and why one is dependent upon the other. The major functions included in the instructional analysis process are described and illustrated with examples. The benefits of using this approach to achieve effective and efficient instruction are summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, A.S., Hoffman, C.K., & Medsker, K.L. (1980).Instructional systems design-principles and techniques. (Course Documentation) Piscataway, New Jersey: Bell Laboratories Systems Training Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W.W. (1981).Handbook of procedures for the design of instruction (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I.K. (1973).Competency based learning; Technology, management, and design. New York; McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1978).The systematic design of instruction. Glenview, Illinois; Scott Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esseff, P.J., & Esseff, M.S. (1974).Workbook on developing individualized instruction: Learning hierarchies and modules. Educational Systems for the Future; Columbia, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R.M. (1974). Task analysis—Its relation to content analysis.Educational Psychologist, 11, 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R.M. (1977).The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R.M. & Briggs, L.J. (1979).Principles of instructional design (2nd ed.). New York; Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A.S. (1977).A review of content and task analysis methodology. (Technical Report No. 2, March 1, 1977.) San Diego, California; Courseware, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.B. (1956).A suggested guide to position task description. (Technical Memorandum ASPR-TM-56-6.) Lackland Air Force Base, Texas; Air Force Personnel and Training Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wager, W.W. (1976).Instructional curriculum mapping. Paper presented at the Annual Spring conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffman, C.K., Medsker, K.L. Instructional analysis. Journal of Instructional Development 6, 17–23 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906214

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906214

Keywords

Navigation