Skip to main content
Log in

The process of task analysis

Integrating training’s multiple methods

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of instructional development

Summary

Task analysis is the key to developing the specifications for performance and instructions in instructional systems design. Task analysis, when considered from a process perspective, involves three steps, each of which can be approached with various analysis techniques. These steps and techniques can be summarized as follows.

Step 1. Break the task, content, etc., down into the constituent elements.

Analysis Techniques:

  • •Task definition

  • •Job/task inventory

  • •Risk assessment

  • •Hierarchical redescription

  • •Task detailing

Step 2. Determine the relationship among these elements.

Analysis Techniques:

  • •Behavioral analysis

  • •Visionary analysis

  • •Critical incident analysis

  • •Problem analysis

  • •Network matrix analysis

Step 3. Restructure in accordance with the underlying principle or optimal learning design.

Analysis Techniques:

  • •Job aid development

  • •Learning strategy analysis

  • •Learning hierarchy sequencing

  • •Training objective development

  • •Master design chart development

Instruction and training are often derived using analysis techniques which follow this process in a haphazard manner. If task analysis is carefully organized and follows the proper steps, it can be used to solve many training problems—not because of some inherent magic, but because of the detailed, careful, integrated analysis involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernard, M. E.Task analysis in instructional program development. Theoretical paper No. 52, Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, University of Wisconsin. (ERIC Document, ED 114 735).

  • Carlisle, K. E. The learning strategy technique of task analysis.NSPI Journal, 1982,21 (2), 9–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, K. E. Improving task analysis in the nuclear utility industry.NSPI Journal, 1983,22(2),8–9; 27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. K. Task analysis: Some process and content concerns.AVCR, 1973,21(1), 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. K. Competency based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book, 1973b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. K.Objectives in curriculum design. London: McGraw-Hill Book, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., & Diekhoff, K. B. Cognitive maps as a tool in communicating structural knowledge.Educational Technology, 1982,22(4),28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, K. Strategies for analysis of a task. InJ. Hartley (Ed.),Strategies for programmed instruction: An educational technology. London, England: Butterworths, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M.The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. S. Pre-development analysis in military training.NSPI Journal, 1980,19(1),34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F. A question of performance—Part I: The PROBE model.Training and Development Journal, 1982, 36(9), 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F. A question of performance—Part II: Applying the PROBE model.Training and Development Journal, 1982, 36(10), 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. F. &Bullock, D. H. Job analysis.The Training Consultants’ Memo, 1982,2, 8–9; 1–14.

  • Kaufman, R. & Mitchell, D. L. Risk and training.NSPI Journal, 1982, 21(2),4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepner-Tregoe, Inc. Problem analysis and decision making. Princeton, NJ: Author, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, L. N. The improvement of instruction, learning, and performance.Educational Technology, 1982,22(10),7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, E. J. Job analysis: Methods and applications. New York: AMACOM, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, F. M. Try brainstorming—A quick route to job analysis.Training/HRD, 1982,19(3),38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D., & Tennyson, R. D.Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Pub., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, P. F. Analysis of a procedural task.NSPI Journal, 1980,19(1k),11–15, 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, P. F. Representations for algorithms.NSPI Journal, 1980,19(8),18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. Task description and analysis. InR. M. Gagne (Ed.),Psychological principles in system development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J. & Stammers, R. Analysis for training. In J. Hartley & I. K. Davies (Eds.),Contributions to an educational technology, Vol. 2. London: Kogan Page, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. Skill and error in everyday life. In M.J.A. Howe (Ed.),Adult learning: Psychology research and applications. New York: John Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. & Darwazeh, A. The elaboration theory’s procedure for designing instruction: A conceptual approach.Journal of Instructional Development, 1982,5(3),22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, W. S. Skills analysis training. London: Sir Isaac Pittman and Sons, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, A. An improved tabular format for task analysis.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1976,49, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemke, R. The critical incident method of analysis. In R. Zemke, L. Standke, & P. Jones, (Eds.),Designing and delivering cost effective training—And measuring the results. Minneapolis, MN: Lakewood Pub., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlisle, K.E. The process of task analysis. Journal of Instructional Development 6, 31–35 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906216

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906216

Keywords

Navigation