Summary
Task analysis is the key to developing the specifications for performance and instructions in instructional systems design. Task analysis, when considered from a process perspective, involves three steps, each of which can be approached with various analysis techniques. These steps and techniques can be summarized as follows.
Step 1. Break the task, content, etc., down into the constituent elements.
Analysis Techniques:
-
•Task definition
-
•Job/task inventory
-
•Risk assessment
-
•Hierarchical redescription
-
•Task detailing
Step 2. Determine the relationship among these elements.
Analysis Techniques:
-
•Behavioral analysis
-
•Visionary analysis
-
•Critical incident analysis
-
•Problem analysis
-
•Network matrix analysis
Step 3. Restructure in accordance with the underlying principle or optimal learning design.
Analysis Techniques:
-
•Job aid development
-
•Learning strategy analysis
-
•Learning hierarchy sequencing
-
•Training objective development
-
•Master design chart development
Instruction and training are often derived using analysis techniques which follow this process in a haphazard manner. If task analysis is carefully organized and follows the proper steps, it can be used to solve many training problems—not because of some inherent magic, but because of the detailed, careful, integrated analysis involved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernard, M. E.Task analysis in instructional program development. Theoretical paper No. 52, Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, University of Wisconsin. (ERIC Document, ED 114 735).
Carlisle, K. E. The learning strategy technique of task analysis.NSPI Journal, 1982,21 (2), 9–41.
Carlisle, K. E. Improving task analysis in the nuclear utility industry.NSPI Journal, 1983,22(2),8–9; 27.
Davies, I. K. Task analysis: Some process and content concerns.AVCR, 1973,21(1), 73–85.
Davies, I. K. Competency based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book, 1973b.
Davies, I. K.Objectives in curriculum design. London: McGraw-Hill Book, 1976.
Diekhoff, G. M., & Diekhoff, K. B. Cognitive maps as a tool in communicating structural knowledge.Educational Technology, 1982,22(4),28–30.
Duncan, K. Strategies for analysis of a task. InJ. Hartley (Ed.),Strategies for programmed instruction: An educational technology. London, England: Butterworths, 1972.
Gagne, R. M.The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1977.
Gibbons, A. S. Pre-development analysis in military training.NSPI Journal, 1980,19(1),34–42.
Gilbert, T. F. A question of performance—Part I: The PROBE model.Training and Development Journal, 1982, 36(9), 21–30.
Gilbert, T. F. A question of performance—Part II: Applying the PROBE model.Training and Development Journal, 1982, 36(10), 85–89.
Jackson, S. F. &Bullock, D. H. Job analysis.The Training Consultants’ Memo, 1982,2, 8–9; 1–14.
Kaufman, R. & Mitchell, D. L. Risk and training.NSPI Journal, 1982, 21(2),4–7.
Kepner-Tregoe, Inc. Problem analysis and decision making. Princeton, NJ: Author, 1979.
Landa, L. N. The improvement of instruction, learning, and performance.Educational Technology, 1982,22(10),7–12.
McCormick, E. J. Job analysis: Methods and applications. New York: AMACOM, 1979.
McDermott, F. M. Try brainstorming—A quick route to job analysis.Training/HRD, 1982,19(3),38–40.
Merrill, M. D., & Tennyson, R. D.Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Pub., 1977.
Merrill, P. F. Analysis of a procedural task.NSPI Journal, 1980,19(1k),11–15, 26.
Merrill, P. F. Representations for algorithms.NSPI Journal, 1980,19(8),18–24.
Miller, R. Task description and analysis. InR. M. Gagne (Ed.),Psychological principles in system development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1962.
Patrick, J. & Stammers, R. Analysis for training. In J. Hartley & I. K. Davies (Eds.),Contributions to an educational technology, Vol. 2. London: Kogan Page, 1978.
Reason, J. Skill and error in everyday life. In M.J.A. Howe (Ed.),Adult learning: Psychology research and applications. New York: John Wiley, 1977.
Reigeluth, C. M. & Darwazeh, A. The elaboration theory’s procedure for designing instruction: A conceptual approach.Journal of Instructional Development, 1982,5(3),22–32.
Seymour, W. S. Skills analysis training. London: Sir Isaac Pittman and Sons, 1968.
Shepherd, A. An improved tabular format for task analysis.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1976,49, 93–104.
Zemke, R. The critical incident method of analysis. In R. Zemke, L. Standke, & P. Jones, (Eds.),Designing and delivering cost effective training—And measuring the results. Minneapolis, MN: Lakewood Pub., 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlisle, K.E. The process of task analysis. Journal of Instructional Development 6, 31–35 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906216
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906216