Skip to main content
Log in

Computer aided evaluation of differences in host reactions between isolates of turnip mosaic virus fromSisymbrium loeselii

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Biologia Plantarum

Abstract

Twenty three isolates of turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) obtained from spontaneously infected plants ofSiaymbrivm loeaelii JUSL. were serologically related, but differed in reactions of eleven host plants. Susceptibility and sensitivity of each host for each TuMV isolate were classified by one of six degrees (0 to 5) respectively. Similarities of isolates (as compared in 253 pairs) were evaluated by means of a computer; for this purpose the source program MINDIF has been elaborated using the universal program language Algol 60. A table of differences between isolates was obtained and distribution of isolate pairs dependent upon the difference values was stated. The fitness of hosts for differentiating TuMV isolates was ascertained quantitatively. No relation of isolate similarity to geographical indices could be established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Choi, J. K., Mabda, T., Wakimoto, S.: An improved method fpr purification of turnip mosaic virus.- Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Japan43: 440–448, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. K., Maeda, T., Wakimoto, S.: Serological properties of turnip mosaic virus. - Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Japan44: 14–21, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisches, H. U., Lockhart, B. E. L.: A Moroccan isolate of turnip mosaic virus infectious to garden pea and other legumes. - Plant Dis. Reporter60: 398–401, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapierre, H., Grison, C.: Note sur une mosaïque de l’alliaire. - Ann. Phytopathol.1: 309–314, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papa, G., Michelin-Lausarot, P., Casetta, A.: Purification and properties ofAlliaria mosaic virus. - Phytopathol. Z.78: 344–356, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polák, Z., Chlumská, J.: [The occurrence of turnip mosaic virus onSisymbrium loeselii Jusl in the territory of Bohemia.] In Czech. - Sborník UVTIZ-Ochrana Rostlin14: 179–182, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Procházková, Z.: Host range and symptom differences between isolates of turnip mosaic virus obtained fromSisymbrium loeselii. - Biol. Plant.22: 341–347, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provvidenti, R.: A mosaic fromPisum sativum caused by a strain of turnip mosaic virus. - Plant Dis. Reporter62: 482–485, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, J. F.: A radial-immunodiffusion test for the simultaneous diagnosis of potato viruses S and X. - Phytopathology60: 1669–1671, 1970.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. R., Zaumeyer, W. J.: A strain of yellow bean mosaic virus producing local lesions on tobacco. -Phytopathology43: 11–15, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, C. M.: Two mosaic diseases of annual stock. - J. agr. Res. (Washington, D.C.)58: 63–77, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowicz-Jakusz, A., Zielińska, L.: [Studies on viroses of parsley and carrot. Part II. Turnip mosaic virus isolated from carrot.] In Polish. - Zeszyty probl. Postepów Nauk roln.226: 71–87, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uschdraweit, H. A., Valentin, H.: Untersuchungen über ein Kruciferen-Virus. - Phytopathol. Z.:31: 139–148, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaumeyer, W. J., Fisher, H. H.: A new necrotic-lesion produoing strain of yellow bean mosaic. - Phytopathology43: 45–49, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brčák, J., Brčák, J. Computer aided evaluation of differences in host reactions between isolates of turnip mosaic virus fromSisymbrium loeselii . Biol Plant 22, 366–373 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908986

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908986

Keywords

Navigation