Abstract
Growth regulators, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), and kinetin (KIN), were used in different concentrations to stimulate the initiation and further development of the fruiting bodies of the fungusLentinus tigrinus. Vegetative mycelium of the fungus was cultivated on cellulose cylinders soaked with a synthetic nutrient solution or with a 3% malt extract. When the mycelium covered the surface of the cylinders, further cultivation was carried out in graduated concentrations of the growth regulators mentioned above. The number of developed fruiting bodies showed that the optimum IAA and GA3 concentrations were in both media 300 p.p.m. The optimum concentration of kinetin was 400 p.p.m.
The individual growth regulators influenced characteristically also the shape of the fruiting bodies and changed in them the natural level of endogenous growth regulators. The addition of IAA into the medium raised the level of endogenous auxins in the cap. The presence of gibberellic acid and of kinetic in the medium resulted in an increase in the level of these regulators in the fruiting bodies.
Abstract
Rustové stimulátory kyselina β-indolyloctová (IAA), kyselina giberelová (GA3) a kinetin (KIN) v různých koncentracích byly použity ke stimulaci vzniku a dalšího růstu plodnic houbyLentinus tigrinus. Vegetativní mycelium houby bylo kultivováno na celulosových válečcích nasáklých syntetickým živným roztokem nebo 3% roztokem sladového výtažku. Když mycelium porostlo povrch válečků, probíhala další kultivace v odstupňovaných koncentracích uvedených stimulátorů. Podle počtu plodnic jsme zjistili, že optimální koncentrace IAA a GA3 v obou kultivačních mediích je 300 ppm. U kinetinu byla optimální koncentrace 400 ppm.
Jednotlivé typy stimulátorů ovlivnily charakteristicky i tvar plodnic a měnily v nich přirozenou hladinu endogenních regulátorů. Přidání IAA do media zvýšilo hladinu auxinových látek v klobouku. Přítomnost giberelové kyseliny nebo kinetinu v mediu se projevila zvýšením hladiny obou těchto látek v plodnicích.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bentley, J. A., Housley, S.: Bioassay of plant growth hormones.—Physiol. Plant.7: 405–419, 1954.
Frankland, B., Wareing, P. F.: Effect of gibberellic acid on hypocotyl growth of lettuce seedlings.—Nature185: 255–256, 1961.
Gogala, N.: Einfluss der natürlichen Cytokinine vonPinus sylvestris L. und anderer Wuchsstoffe auf das Myzelwachstum vonBoletus edulis var.pinicolus Vitt.—Österr. bot. Z.118: 321–333, 1970.
Gruen, H. E.: Auxin and fungi.—Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.10: 405–440, 1958.
Osborne, D. J., McCalla, D. R.: Rapid bioassay for kinetin and kinetins using senescing leaf tissue.—Plant. Physiol.36: 219–221, 1961.
Park, D.: Evidence for a common fungal growth regulator.—Trans. brit. mycol. Soc.46: 541–548, 1963.
Phinney, B. O., West, Ch. A.: Gibberellins as native plant growth regulators.—Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.11: 411–436, 1960.
Rypáček, V., Sladký, Z.: The character of endogenous growth regulators in the course of development in the fungusLentinus tigrinus.—Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl.46: 65–72, 1972.
Rypáček, V., Sladký, Z.: Relation between the level of endogenous growth regulators and the differentiation of the fungusLentinus tigrinus studied in a synthetic medium.—Biol. Plant.15: 20–26, 1973.
Schwantes, H. O., Hagemann, F.: Untersuchungen zur Fruchtkörperbildung beiLentinus tigrinus Bull.—Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges.78: 89–101, 1965.
Szabó, L., Pozsár, B. I., Kota, M.: Cytokinin activity of the fruiting body ofCoprinus micaceus Fr.—Acta Agr. Acad. Sci. hung.19: 402–403, 1970.
Urayama, T.: Stimulative effect of certain specific bacteria upon mycelial growth and fruit body formation ofAgaricus bisporus (Lange) Sing.—Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)74: 56–59, 1961.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address: 611 37 Brno, Kotlářská 2, Czechoslovakia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sladký, Z., Tichý, V. Stimulation of the formation of fruiting bodies of the fungusLentinus tigrinus (Bull.) Fr. by growth regulators. Biol Plant 16, 436–443 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02922234
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02922234