Abstract
THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY was to advance understanding of how to facilitate higher levels of learning when using asynchronous text-based Internet communication technology. The framework used to guide this study is based on the community of inquiry model developed by Garrison, Anderson, and Archer (2000). Crucial methodological constructs congruent with this model and higher order learning were identified. They are discourse, collaboration, management, reflection, monitoring, and knowledge construction. Using a focus group interview, the results of this study reveal that these methodological constructs are consistent with, and supportive of, the facilitation of higher levels of learning in an asynchronous text-based Internet environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boud, D. (1995).Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.
Brookfield, S.D. (1989). Facilitating adult learning. In S.B. Merriam & P. Cunningham (Eds.),Handbook of adult education in the United States. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brookfield, S.D. (1990). Using critical incidents to explore learners’ assumptions. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.),Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning (pp. 173–193). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bruner, J. (1990).Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chambers, J.A. (1992). The learning revolution: electronic classrooms.Interactive Learning International, 8(4), 291–195.
Collett, D., Kanuka, H., Blanchette, J., & Goodale, C. (1999).Learning technologies in distance education. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta.
Crowe, J.L. (2000). Evaluation of adult learners: Ethical issues.New Horizons in Adult Education, 14(3), 4–10.
Fabro, K.R., & Garrison, D.R. (1998). Computer conferencing and higher-order learning.Indian Journal of Open Learning, 7(1), 41–54.
Garrison, D.R., & Anderson, T. (2003).E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.
Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2000).A transactional perspective on teaching-learning: A framework for adult and higher education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education.The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Gokhale, A.A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking.Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). Retrieved June 18, 2003, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v7nl/gokhale.jte-v7nl.html
Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face to face versus computerized conferences.Human Communication Research, 13, 225–252.
Hiltz, S.R., & Turoff, M. (1993).The Network Nation: Human communication via computer, revised edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Imel, S. (2001). Learning technologies in adult education.Myths and Realities. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, No. 17. Retrieved September 12, 2002, from http://ericacve.org/docs/mr00032.pdf.
Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., & Wilson, B.G. (1999).Learning with Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jones, B.F., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (1996).Plugging in: Choosing and using educational technology. Washington, DC: Council for Educational Development and Research North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved June 18, 2003, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/edtalk/toc.htm.
Kanuka, H. (2002). A principled approach to facilitating diverse strategies for web-based distance education.Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 71–87.
Klemm, W.R., & Snell, J.R. (1996). Enriching computer-mediated group learning by coupling constructivism with collaborative learning.Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 1(2). Retrieved June 18, 2003, from http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/e-jist/docs/old/vollno2/contents.htm
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge/Falmer.
Phillips, G.M., Santoro, G.M., & Kuehn, S.A. (1988). The use of computer-mediated communication in training students in group problem-solving and decision-making techniques.The American Journal of Distance Education, 2(1), 38–51.
Taylor, K., Marienau, C., & Fiddler, M. (2000).Strategies for teachers and trainers: Developing adult learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zirkin, B., & Sumler, D. (1995). Interactive or non-interactive? That is the question!!! An annotated bibliography.Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 95–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Heather Kanuka is Associate Director and Assistant Professor of the Learning Commons at the University of Calgary, Canada. The Learning Commons provides services to the university community for faculty development teaching and learning, distance delivery, and multimedia and video production.
D. Randy Garrison is the Director of the Learning Commons at the University of Calgary. He is also a full professor in the Faculty of Education. He served as Dean of the Faculty of Extension at the University of Alberta from 1996 to 2001. Dr. Garrison has published extensively on teaching and learning in distance, higher, and adult education contexts.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanuka, H., Garrison, D.R. Cognitive presence in online learning. J. Comput. High. Educ. 15, 21–39 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940928
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940928