Skip to main content
Log in

Weblogs as an emerging genre in higher education

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

WEBLOGS (or “blogs”) emerged in the past decade as an Internet applications genre, providing a platform for the development of critical, individual voices within the context of Internet resources. Weblogs consist of links to particular Web materials with specific commentary, generally presented in chronological format, harkening back to older, more traditional forms of expression such as diaries and travelogues. Weblog consumption has become increasingly popular in higher education contexts as individuals seek ways to locate Web content of quality and relevance to particular topics or themes. Many individuals have emphasized the autobiographical functions of weblog production, situating the hyperlinks provided in the context of personal reflections and revelations and working to construct narrative selves through “performative” uses of hyperlinking. The character of weblogs as a genre is in part related to collaborative efforts (including the sustained interaction among bloggers in discussion of the genre and critique of each other’s productions). Faculty who incorporate weblog development in teaching initiatives should be aware of privacy and voyeurism considerations as students reveal personal information; however, weblog construction can be useful in conveying new dimensions of identity construction and plagiarism issues in social constructivist frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J. (1975).How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (2000).Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, B. (1999/2000). Searching the Web: New domains for inquiry.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(4), 348–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, S. (1999).The clock of the long now. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. (1998). The Internet and the end of the national communication system: uncertain predictions of an uncertain future.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(1), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, B. (2001). The Net 21: Decisions, decisions.Industry Standard, 3, 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000).Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, W. (2001). Sampling the circle of gifts.Econtent, 24(9), 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, B. (2001). The soloists.Columbia Journalism Review, 40(1), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (1999).Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., & Gushrowski, B. (2000). Genres and the web: Is the personal home page the first uniquely digital genre?Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 202–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, P. (1992).Touching the world: Reference in autobiography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, D. (2001). Campus portals: Supportive mechanisms for university communications, collaborations, and organizational change.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 13(1), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etter, S. (2000). Death of privacy in the 21st century.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12(1), 141–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. (2001). The link, and how we think: Using hypertext as a teaching & learning tool.International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(2), 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S., & Liddy, E. (2001). The searching quagmire.Searcher, 9(5), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. (2000). Save the robots: Cyber profiling and your so-called life.Stanford Law Review, 52(5), 1573–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, B. (2000, November 14). Logging onto the web.Inc., 22(17), 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974).Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, N. (2001, March 23). New weapon on the web to net copy-cat pupils.Times Educational Supplement, 4421, 18. p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gur-Ze’ev, I. (1999). Cyberfeminism and education in the era of the exile of the spirit.Educational Theory, 49(4), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2000).The plagiarism handbook: Strategies for preventing, detecting, and dealing with plagiarism. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S., & Turoff, M. (1985). Structuring computer mediated communication systems to avoid information overload,Communications of the ACM, 28(7), 680–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesdanun, A. (2001, October 28). Attack-related weblogs popular: Online journals provide personal views of Sept. 11.Houston Chronicle, Hearst Corporation, 9.

  • Kim, H. (2000). Motivations for hyperlinking in scholarly electronic articles: A qualitative study.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(10), 885–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, B. (2000). Watch me! Webcams and the public exposure of private lives.Art Journal, 59(4), 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landow, G. (1994).Hyper/Text/Theory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landow, G. (1997).Hypertext 2.0: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, P. (1989).On autobiography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. (1998). “Reflectionism” and “diffusionism”: New tactics for deconstructing the video surveillance superhighway.Leonardo, 31(2), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, R. (2000, November 13). You’ve got blog.New Yorker, 76(34), pp. 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H. (2001, January 15). Blogging burgeons as a form of web expression.U.S. News & World Report, 130(2), p. 52. Online (2001, April 20).Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(32), A51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oravec, J. (1996a). The camera never lies: Social construction of self and group in video, film, and photography.Journal of Value Inquiry, 29, 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oravec, J. (1996b).Virtual individuals, virtual groups: Human dimensions of groupware and computer networking. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oravec, J. (2000). Technologists as prophets and preservationists: The Long New Foundation.Futures Research Quarterly, 16(4), 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, A. (2001). It’s a matter of privacy.Computers in Libraries, 21(6), 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, S. (1996). The virtual complexity of culture. In Robertson, G. (Ed.),Future Natural (pp. 203–217). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poniewozik, J. (2000, May 29). Candid cameras.Time, 155(22), pp. 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N. (1974). Media ecology education. [sound recording]. New York: Speech Communication Association. (Keynote address delivered at the 9th Annual SCA Summer Conference, Chicago, July 12, 1973.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., & Kuwabara, K. (2000). Reputation systems.Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (2000). Online marketing research comes of age.Brandweek, 41(42), 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strate, L. (1999). The varieties of cyberspace: Problems in definition and delimitation.Western Journal of Communication, 63(3), 382–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Udell, J. (2001, May 28). Telling a story.Byte, [Online]. Available: http://www.byte.com

  • Valentine, B. (2001). The legitimate effort in research papers: Student commitment versus faculty expectations.Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(2), 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R., Bigna, S., & Smith, M. (2001). Plagiarism and the web.Journal of Social Work Education, 37(1), 193–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T. (2000, October 30). Individuality conquers information overload as weblogs proliferate.Wall Street Journal — Eastern Edition, 236(84), p. B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, C. (2001). ‘Net users expect fresh content with each visit.Computing Canada, 27(6), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jo Ann Oravec.

Additional information

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jo Ann Oravec is an Associate Professor in the College of Business and Economics at the University of Wisconsin at Whitewater. She received her MBA, MA, MS and PhD from the University of Wisconsin at Madison. She taught computer information systems and public policy at Baruch College of the City University of New York and also taught in the School of Business and the Computer Sciences Department at UW-Madison. In the 1990s, she served as the chair of the Privacy Council of the State of Wisconsin, the nation’s first state-level council dealing with information technology and privacy issues. She has written several books (includingVirtual Individuals, Virtual Groups: Human Dimensions of Groupware and Computer Networking, Cambridge University Press andHome as Information Space: Electronic Commerce and the Domestication of Computer Networking, forthcoming) and dozens of articles on computing technology issues. She has worked for public television, engaged in corporate consulting, and developed software along with her academic ventures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oravec, J.A. Weblogs as an emerging genre in higher education. J. Comput. High. Educ. 14, 21–44 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940937

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940937

Keywords

Navigation