Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental assessment of products

The ranges of the societal preferences method

  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of product alternatives in Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is a critical step on the basis of results as related to their impact category data. Decisions involving several environmental issues are hardly ever straightforward, since one alternative only seldom clearly dominates the others in all aspects. More often, one alternative scores better on some environmental issues and worse on others. A combination of impact data and preferences is then required for evaluation. This can be done using evaluation methods based on fixed societal preferences. However, by applying different evaluation methods to the same data, different “best” alternatives may be chosen. This reduces the credibility of LCA results.

Instead of fixed societal preferences an approach has been developed which uses consensus-oriented ranges of societal values for specifying the ranking of the overall environmental attractiveness of alternatives. These ranges may indicate both the uncertainty of decision-makers and the shifting of societal values, e.g. as related to the dynamics of knowledge of environmental problem areas.

In this article, an approach is proposed which combines environmental data and uncertain societal values to form a clear statement on alternatives regarding their overall damage. By using a full set of potentially relevant societal preferences, a merely coincidental selection of the best product alternative is ruled out. A step-by-step procedure, narrowing down the feasible range of societal preferences, has been developed. The approach is illustrated using a case study of TV-housing concepts and a survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumann, H., Rydberg, T.: Life Cycle Assessment: A comparison of three Methods for Impact Analysis and Valuation, in: Rydberg, T.: Improved Environmental Performance of Products — Halocarbon Substitution, Packaging Development and Life Cycle Assessment, Göteborg 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt, S., Kreibich, R., Lundie, S., Pfitzner, R., Scharp, M.: ökobilanzierung komplexer Elektronikprodukte — In-novationen und Umweltentlastungspotentiale durch Lebens-zyklusanalyse, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN), NAGUS-AA 3/UA: Grundsätze produktbczogcner Ökobilanzen, German “Memorandum of Understanding”: Sonderdruck aus DIN-Mit- teilungen + elektronorm 73, Nr. 3, p. 208–212, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W.,Newmann, J.R.: Multiattribute Evaluation. Series: Quantitative Applications in Societal Science, No. 26, Sage University Paper, 1982

  • Fava, J.,Consoli, F.J.,Denison, R.,Dickson, K.,Mohin, T.,Vigon, B. (eds.) (1992): Conceptual Framework for Life Cycle Impact Analysis. SETAC and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education. Workshop Report, 1.-7. February, Sandestin, Florida

  • Gäegf.n, G.: Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entscheidungen. 3. Aufl., J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée, J.B.: Development of a Methodology for the environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products with a Case Study on Margarines, Proefschrift, CML, Leiden 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée, J.B., Heijungs, R. (final editor),Huppes, G., Lankreijer, R.M., Udo de Haes, H.A., Wegener Sleeswijk, A.: Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products, Guide and Background, CML, Leiden 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs, R.: Valuation: A Societal Approach. In: Udo de Haes, H.A., Jensen, A.A., Klöpffer, W., Lindfors, L.-G.: Integrating Impact Assessment into LCA, Proceedings of the SETAC- Europe Congress, 11.-14. April 1994, Brussels 1994

  • Herrchkn, M., Klein, W.: Aktuelle Diskussion zur Methodik der Wirkungs-Ökobilanzierung — ihr Einsatz in der Abfall- wirtschaft. In: Fleischer, G.: Produktionsintegrierter Um-weltschutz, EF-Verlag für Energie-und Umwelttechnik GmbH, Berlin 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter, P.: Towards a structured aggregation procedure. In: Braunschweig, A., Förster, R., Hofstetter, P., Müller-Wenk, R.: Developments in LCA Valuation, IWÖ — Dis-kussionsbeitrag, Nr. 32, Zurich 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Huppes, G., Sas, H., de Haan, E., Kuyper, J.: Efficient Environ- mental Investments, Paper presented at the SENSE International Workshop: Environmental Analysis and Economics in Industrial Decision Making, Amsterdam 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Methods and Applications, A State-of-the-Art-Survey, in: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 186, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization ISO 14040: Environmental management — Life Cycle Assessment — Principles and framework. Draft International Standard, ISO/TC 207/SC 5, 1996

  • International Organization for Standardization ISO/WD 14042.1: Environmental management — Life Cycle Assessment — Life Cycle Impact Assessment, ISO/TC 207/SC 5, 1997

  • Lindfors, L.-G.,Christiansen, K.,Hoffman, L.,Virtanen, Y.,Juntilla, V.,Hanssen, O.-J.,Rönninc, A.,Ekvall, T.,Finnveden, G.: Nordic Guidelines on Life Cycle Assessment, Report Nord 1995:20, Copenhagen 1995

  • Lundie, S.: Ökobilanzierung und Entscheidungstheorie — Praxisorientierte Produktbewertung auf der Basis gesell-schaftlicher Werthaltungen. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A.: The Magic Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information- In: Alexis, M., Wilson, C.Z. (ed.): Organizational Decision Making, 3. Aufl., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Notarnicola, B., Huppes, G., Van den Berg, N.W.: Monetary and Policy-Based Weighting Methods in LCA. Forthcoming article in: International Journal of LCA, Landsberg 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC): Life Cycle Assessment — Inventory, Classification, Valuation, Data Bases, Leiden workshop, Leiden workshop report, Leiden 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Walz, R., Herrchen, M., Keller, D., Stahl, B.: Impact Category Ecotoxicity and Valuation Procedure — Ecotoxicolo-gical Impact Assessment and the Valuation Step within LCA — Pragmatic Approaches. In: International Journal of LCA 1(4), Landsberg 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K.: Mehrkriterielle Entscheidungen, Oldenbourg Verlag GmbH, München 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C.-L.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making — An Introduction, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks 1995

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Environmental Science, Section Substances and Products, Einsteinweg 2, P.O. Box 95 18, NL-2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Sven Lundie & Gjalt Huppes

Authors
  1. Sven Lundie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gjalt Huppes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundie, S., Huppes, G. Environmental assessment of products. Int. J. LCA 4, 7–15 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979389

Keywords

Search

Navigation