Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Long-Term Impacts in LCA

  • Conference Reports: 22nd Discussion Forum on LCA I
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When looking at a product’s life cycle, emissions and resource uses, as well as the resulting impacts, usually occur at different points in time. For instance, construction materials are often ‘stored’ in buildings for many decades before they are recycled or disposed of. The goal of the LCA Discussion Forum 22 was to present and discuss arguments pro and contra a temporally differentiated weighting of impacts. The discussion forum started with three talks that illustrated the importance of temporal aspects in LCI and LCIA. The following two presentations discussed the economical principles of discounting, the adequacy of this concept within LCA, and the ethical questions involved. After one further short presentation, three groups were formed that discussed questions about temporally-differentiated weighting, and consequences for LCI as well as LCIA (damage assessment and final weighting). The discussion forum ended with the following conclusions: (a) long-term impacts should be considered in LCA, and (b) long-term emissions should be inventoried separately from short-term emissions. There was no consensus on whether short-term and long-term impacts should be weighted equally. Some prefer to weigh short-term emissions higher, because they are considered to be closer. Consistent and approved forecasts should be used when considering future changes in environmental conditions in LCI and LCIA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ecoinvent Centre (2004): ecoinvent data v1.1, Final reports ecoinvent 2000 No. 1-15. CD-ROM, ISBN 3-905594-38-2, Dübendorf, CH: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories

  2. Goedkoop M et al. (1999): The Eco-indicator 99: A Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology Report, Amersfoort: Pre Consultants

  3. Huijbregts MAJ, Guinée JB, Reijnders L, (2001): Priority Assessment of Toxic Substances in the Frame of LCA. Ill: Export of Potential Impact over Time and Space. Chemosphere 44: 59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doka G (2003): Life Cycle Inventories of Waste Treatment Services. CD-ROM, Final report ecoinvent 2000 No. 13, Dubendorf, CH: EMPA St. Gallen, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories

  5. Huijbregts MAJ (1999): Priority Assessment of Toxic Substances in the Frame of LCA—The Multi-Media Fate, Exposure and Effect Model USES-LCA. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam (NL)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Stefanie Hellweg or Rolf Frischknecht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellweg, S., Frischknecht, R. Evaluation of Long-Term Impacts in LCA. Int J LCA 9, 339–341 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979427

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979427

Keywords

Navigation