Abstract
Contaminated sediment management is complex and multivariate, involving a careful balance of science, politics and economics. As is true for most such complex issues, there is not a single correct way to address a problem, but rather the approach should be driven by the ecological, political and economic goals of all interested parties. However, because the choices made have far-reaching implications, it is useful for countries, regions or communities to develop standard approaches for sediment assessment and management to meet agreed-upon goals. This paper provides a brief review of a number of sediment assessment frameworks from around the world. Their main similarities and differences, and some of the reasons behind them, are addressed. Aspects of assessing and managing sediments are discussed, as well as why these are (or should be) driven by sediment management goals. Finally, suggestions are made to support the development of a European framework for sediment management and environmental quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apitz S, Davis J, Finkelstein K, Hohreiter D, Hoke R, Jensen R, Kirtay V, Jersac J, Mack E, Magar V, Moore D, Reible D, Stahl R (2002): Critical Issues for Contaminated Sediment Management. MESO-02-TM-01, http://meso.spawar.navy.mil/docs/ MESO-02-TM-01.pdf
Apitz S, Chadwick D (1999): SERDP CU1209: Pathway Ranking for In-place Sediment Management (PRISM). http://www.serdp. org/research/CU/CU-1209.pdf
Apitz S, Chadwick D (2001): Pathway Ranking for In-situ Sediment Management (PRISM). Proceedings of the International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, October 10–12, 2001, Venice, Italy
ASTM (1995): Standard Guide for Developing Conceptual Site Models for Contaminated Sites. E 1689-95. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.08
Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ARMCANZ) (2000): Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. October 2000, ISBN 0 9578245 2 1 and ISSN 1038 7072
Batley G (2001): Assessing sediment quality. Learned Discourse in SETAC Globe Newsletter 2, 37–38
Batley G, Burton G, Chapman P, Forbes V (2002): Uncertainties in Sediment Quality Weight of Evidence (WOE) Assessments. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8, in press
Brils J (2002): The SedNet mission. Journal of Soils and Sediments 2(1)
Canadian Councils of Ministers for the Environment (CCME) (1999): Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: Summary tables. In: Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999, Canadian Council of Ministers for the Environment, Winnipeg
The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) (2002): Draft sea disposal framework. In progress
Chapman P et al. (2001): Sediment quality values (SQVs) - Challenges and recommendations. Learned Discourse. SETAC Globe 2, 24–26
Chapman P, Allard P, Vigers G (1999): Development of sediment quality values for Hong Kong Special Administration Region: A possible model for other jurisdictions. Mar Pollut Bull 38, 161–169
Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (Oslo and Paris Convention) (OSPAR- COM) (1998): OSPAR Guidelines for the Management of Dredged Material
EVS Environment Consultants. Compilation of world-wide sediment quality guidelines for metals and metalloids. EVS Project No 3/676-07. Prepared for ILZRO, ICA and NPERA, 93 pp
GKSS Research Centre (2001): Workshop Report II, River Sediments and Related Dredged Material in Europe River Sediments and Dredged Material as Part of the System Catchment-Coastal Sea: Policy and Regulatory Aspects, http://w3g.gkss.de/i a/dredged material/index.html
Hong Kong Works Bureau (2000): Management of dredged/excavated sediments. HK Works Bureau Technical Circular No 3/ 2000. Ref: WB(W) 209/32/96 (April 27 2000)
Long E, Morgan L (1991): The potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the national status and trends program. NOS OMA 52. NOAA Technical Memorandum. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA
Long E, MacDonald D, Smith S, Calder F (1995): Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentration in marine and estuarine sediments. Environmental Management 19, 81–97
MacDonald D, Carr R, Calder F, Long E, Ingersoll C (1996): Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5, 253–278
National Research Council (NRC) (1997): Contaminated Sediments in Ports and Waterways: Cleanup Strategies and Technologies. Washington DC, National Academy Press, http://www.nap.edu/ books/030905439l/html/index.html
National Research Council (NRC) (2001): A Risk-Management Strategy for PCB-Contaminated Sediments. Committee on Remediation of PCB-Contaminated Sediments, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Division on Life and Earth Studies, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington DC, May 15
Nicholson S (2000): Biological-based screening in the management of contaminated dredged sediment in Hong Kong. Learned Discourse in SETAC Globe 2, 38–40
Peerboom R, van Hattum B (2000): The National Policy Framework in the Netherlands. Dredged Material in the Port of Rotterdam - Interface between Rhine Catchment Area and North Sea - Project Report. Part D, Current and Future Policies and Regulatory Framework, http://coast.gkss.de/aos/dredged
Power E, Chapman P (1992): Assessing sediment quality. Chapter 1. In: Sediment Toxicity Assessment. Burton GA Jr. (Ed). Lewis Publishers, pp 1–16
Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis Program (PSDDA) (1988): Evaluation Procedures Technical Appendix-Phase I (June 1988)
PSDDA (1989): Management Plan Report-Phase II (September 1989)
US EPA (1994): ARCS Assessment Guidance Document. EPA 905- B94-002. Chicago, III: Great Lakes National Program Office
US EPA (1998): Contaminated Sediment Management Strategy (EPA 823-R-98-004). Access via website http://www.epa.gov/OST/cs/ stratefs.html
US EPA (2001.): Draft Report on the Incidence and Severity of Sediment Contamination in Surface Waters of the United States, National Sediment Quality Survey. EPA-823-F-01-031 (December 2001)
US EPA and ACOE (1998a): Evaluation of material proposed for discharge to waters of the US - Testing Manual (Inland Testing Manual). EPA-823-B-98-004, Office of Water and the Department of the Army US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington DC
US EPA and ACOE (1998b): Great Lakes Dredged Material Testing and Evaluation Manual (September 1998)
US EPA and ACOE (1991): Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Ocean Disposal - Testing Manual (Ocean Testing Manual). EPA-503-8-91-001 USEPA Office of Water and the Department of the Army US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington DC
US EPA and ACOE (1990): Ecological evaluation of proposed dis- charge of dredged material into ocean waters. EPA-503-8-90/ 002, Washington DC
Washington State Department of Ecology. Sediment Quality Standards, WAC 172-204-320. The Sediment Impact Zone Maximum Level, WAC 173-204-420; and the Sediment Cleanup Screening Level/Minimum Cleanup Level, WAC 173-204-520
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper was originally an invited address for the Risk Management and Communication Workgroup WG5 at the European Sediment Research Network (SedNet) Inaugural Conference, Venice, Italy, April 22–23, 2002
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Apitz, S.E., Power, E.A. From risk assessment to sediment management an international perspective. J Soils & Sediments 2, 61–66 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987872
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987872