Skip to main content
Log in

ERCP in the management of patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Re-Appraising current indications

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study assessed the ability of biochemical tests and ultrasound to predict the presence of ductal calculi, and thereby refine the indications for ERCP, in patients before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thirteen of fifty-three patients investigated before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and four of seventeen investigated after had stones confirmed at ERCP. The most sensitive indices for stones were raised serum alkaline phosphatase (0.76), aspartate transferase (0.75) and alanine transferase (0.76). The most specific indices were an abnormal ultrasound (0.92), raised serum amylase (0.78) and raised bilirubin (0.75). Serum bilirubin, amylase and ultrasound were all normal in twenty-seven patients and all of these had normal ERCPs. If patients with normal bilirubin, amylase and ultrasound were not referred for ERCP, no stones would have been overlooked and the number of ERCPs could have been reduced by 39%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grace, P. A., Quereshi, A., Coleman, J., et. al. Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78; 160–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nathanson, L. K., Shimi, S., Cushieri, A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78: 155–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paterson-Brown, S., Garden, O. J., Carter, D. C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br.J. Surg. 1991; 78: 131–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cameron, J. L., Gadacz, T. R Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann. Surg. 1991; 213; 1–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wastell, C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. Med. J. 1991; 302: 302–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schirmer, B. D., Edge, S. B., Dix, J. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy treatment of choice of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann. Surg. 1991; 213: 665–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, F., Icard, P., Berthelot, G., Levard, H. Celioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of thirty-six cases. Ann. Surg. 1991; 211: 60–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peters, J. H., Ellison, E. C., Innes, J. T., et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann. Surg. 1991; 213: 3–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.N Eng J Med 1991; 324: 1973–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graves, H. A., Ballinger, J. F., Anderson, W. J. Appraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann. Surg. 1991; 213: 655–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerber, A. A requiem for the routine operative cholangiogram. Surg. Obst. Gynecol. 1986; 163: 363–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scott-Coombes, D., Thompson, J. Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. Med. J. 1991; 303: 1281–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McEntee, G., Grace, P. A., Bouchier-Hayes, D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the common bile duct. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78: 385–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson, T. G., Hall, J. C., Watts, J. McK. Is operative cholangiography always necessary? Br J. Surg. 1986; 73: 637–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson, J. N. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. Med. J. 1991; 302: 533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boulay, J., Schellenberg, R., Brady, P. G. The role of ERCP and therapeutic biliary endoscopy in association with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1992; 87: 837–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marotta, F., Hada, R., Morello, P. et al. ERCP in the assessment of patients with post-cholecystectomy syndrome: benefits and limitations. Netherlands J. of Med. 1989; 35: 232–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosselano, A. R., Osnes, M. Biliary concrements: the endoscopic approach. World J. Surg. 1989; 13: 178–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cotton, P. B. Critical appraisal of therapeutic endoscopy in biliary tract diseases. Ann. Rev. Med. 1990; 41:21 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yip, A. W. C., Ng, W. S., Chow, W. C. et al. Plea for selective operative cholangiography. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 1991; 36: 21–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Joyce, W. P., Keane, R., Burke, G. J. et al. Identification of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78: 1174–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bailey, R. W., Zucker, K. A., Flowers, J. L., et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients. Ann. Surg. 1991; 214; 531–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Berci, G., Sackier, J., Phillips, E. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anomalies and bile duct injuries. World Congress of Surgery, Stockholm 1991: 142.

  24. Ponsky, J. L. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1991: 161: 393–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quershi, A., Browne, A., Leahy, A.L. et al. ERCP in the management of patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Re-Appraising current indications. I.J.M.S. 162, 510–512 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03022585

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03022585

Keywords

Navigation