Skip to main content
Log in

National and subnational projections of elderly living arrangements: An application of the net transition probability macrosimulation model

  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, McDonaldet al. (2006) outlined a new method of projecting living arrangements, households and dwellings at the national and subnational level, using quinquennial census data. The purpose of this paper is to apply this new simulation method to project the composition of elderly living arrangements at the national and subnational level in Australia over the period 2001 to 2016.

This study presents projections of living arrangements for Temporal Statistical Districts within New South Wales and for Australia as a whole. Results show a strong increase in the number of the elderly living alone, particularly elderly males. The rate of growth in lone-person households is particularly strong in coastal and regional New South Wales, underlining the importance of capturing subnational differences in probabilities of births, deaths, migration and household movements when producing regional projections of living arrangements. This paper concludes by considering implications of the findings and potential uses of the net transition probability method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aday, L and R. Eichkorn. 1972.The Utilization of Health Services: Indices and Correlates. A Research Bibliography. Washington DC: National Center for Health Services Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber, S. 2004. Gender, marital status, and ageing: linking material, health, and social resources.Journal of Aging Studies 18(1): 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 1999.Household and Family Projections, 1996 to 2021. Cat. No. 3236. Canberra.

  • Bishop, B. 1999.The National Strategy for an Ageing Australia. Healthy Ageing Discussion Paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M., M. Bell and P. Rees. 2000. Creating a temporally consistent spatial framework for the analysis of inter-regional migration in Australia.International Journal of Population Geography 6(2): 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börsch-Supan, A. 1989. Household dissolution and the choice of alternative living arrangements among elderly Americans. Pp. 119–150 in D. Wise (ed.),The Economics of Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B. and A. Yamada. 2002. Getting older, getting poorer? A study of the earnings, pensions, assets and living arrangements of older people in nine countries.Occasional Paper 60. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, N. 1991. Living arrangements and sources of care giving.Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 46(1): S1-S8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, N. 1995. Long-term elderly widows and divorcees: similarities and differences.Journal of Women and Aging 7(3): 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, D. 1997. Displacing the family: Union army pensions and elderly living arrangements.Journal of Political Economy 105(6): 1269–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englehardt, G., J. Gruber and C. Perry. 2002. Social security and elderly living arrangements.NBER Working Paper No. 8911, April. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, M., R. Rushworth and M. Rob. 1994. Health services and the elderly: An evaluation of utilisation data.Australian Journal on Ageing 13(4): 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerger, T., G. Picone and F. Sloan. 1996. Public subsidies, private provision of care and living arrangements of the elderly.Review of Economics and Statistics 78(3): 428–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, I. 1987. Household change and housing needs: a forecasting model. Pp. 327–341 in J. Bongaarts, T. Burch and K. Watcher (eds),Family Demography: Methods and Their Applications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooimeijer, P. and H. Heida. 1995. Household projections and housing market behavior. Pp. 293–318 in E. van Imhoffet al. (eds),Household Demography and Household Modelling. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooimeijer, P. and A. Oscamp. 1999. Advances in the microsimulation of demographic behavior. Pp. 229–263, in L. van Wissen and P. Dykstra (eds)Population Issues: An Interdisciplinary Focus. New York: Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, G. 2003. Australias, ageing population: some challenges for planners.Australian Planner 40(2): 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. and B. Felmingham. 2002. As the population clock winds down: indicative effects of population ageing in Australias states and territories.Journal of Population Research 19(1): 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, L. and L. Waite. 1995. Till death do us part: marital disruption and mortality.American Journal of Sociology 100(5): 1131–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, A. and W. Shima. 1986.Home Microcomputer Users Guide. Honolulu: East West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. 2001.Medium and Long-Term Projections of Housing Needs in Australia: Positioning Paper. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. 2004. Getting a little older each year: the demography of ageing in Australia. Pp. 31–37 in CEDA,Australias Ageing Population Fiscal, Labour Market and Social Implications. Melbourne: Committee for the Economic Development of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. and R. Kippen. 1998.Household Trends and Projections: Victoria 1986–2011. Canberra: Demography Program, The Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. and R. Kippen. 1999. Ageing: the social and demographic dimensions. Pp. 47–70 inPolicy Implications of the Ageing of Australias Population. Canberra: Ausinfo.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P., R. Kippen and J. Temple. 2006. Net transition probabilities: an approach to subnational level projections of households and housing dem and based on Census data.Population, Space and Place 12(6): 479–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. and J. Temple. 2003a.Projections of Housing Demand in New South Wales, 2001–2016: Summary Report. Sydney: NSW Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources and NSW Department of Housing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. and J. Temple. 2003b. International migration and the growth of households in Sydney.People and Place 11(4): 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. and J. Temple. 2004.Evaluation of Medium-Term Projections of Housing Needs in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. Available at<http:www.ahuri.edu.au>.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, K. and R. Schoeni. 2000. Social security, economic growth, and the rise in elderly widows independence in the twentieth century.Demography 37(2): 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. 1991. Household modeling and forecasting—dynamic approaches with use of linked census data.Environment and Planning A 23(6): 885–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishioka, H., H. Suzuki, T. Koyama, C. Yamamoto and K. Kojima. 2000. Household projections for Japan, 1995–2020: methods and results.Review of Population and Social Policy 9(1): 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzin, L. and B. Schone. 1999. Parental marital disruption and intergenerational transfers: an analysis of lone elderly parents and their children.Demography 36(3): 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. 2005.Economic Implications of an Ageing Australia. Canberra.

  • Qu, L. and R. Weston. 2003. Ageing, living arrangements and subjective wellbeing.Family Matters 66(Spring): 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. 1996. The effects of family composition, health and social support linkages on mortality.Journal of Health and Social Behavior 37 (December),: 326–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, D. 1982. Living arrangements and the later family life cycle in Australia.Australian Journal on Ageing 1(2): 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, D. 1986. Family structure. Pp. 17–37. in H. Kendig (ed.),Ageing and Families: A Social Networks Perspective. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, D. 1997. The demography of ageing and families in Australia.Australian Journal on Ageing 16(3): 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, D. 2003. An ageing population: emergence of a new stage of life? Pp. 238–265 in S. Khoo and P. McDonald (eds),The Transformation of Australias Population: 1970–2030. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. 2002. The economic costs of informal elder caregiving.Business Perspectives 14(1): 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindelar, J. 1982. Differential use of medical care by sex.Journal of Political Economy 90(5): 1003–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. 2004. Explaining the private health insurance coverage of older Australians.People and Place 12(2): 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. 2005. Older Australians as consumers: the role of selected demographic factors in explaining expenditure on necessities. Ph.D Thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. 2006a. Understanding population ageing in NSW: what is the effect of retirement migration and ageing in place?Ageing in Place 1(1): 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. 2006b. Food insecurity among older Australians.Australasian Journal on Ageing 25(3): 158–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D. 1987. Family status and health behaviours: social control as a dimension of social integration.Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 28(3): 306–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Imhoff, E. and N. W. Keilman. 1991.LIPRO 2.0: An Application of a Dynamic Demographic Projection Model to Household Structure in the Netherlands. NIDI CBGS Publications. No. 23. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. 1993. Does marriage matter?Demography 32(4): 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. and M. Bell. 2004. Australias undcertain demographic future.Demographic Research 11(8): 195–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. and P. Rees. 2005. Recent developments in population projection methodology: a review.Population Space and Place 11(5): 337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, I. 1997. The influence of family relationships on later life.Family Matters 48 (Spring/Summer): 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeromey Temple.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Temple, J. National and subnational projections of elderly living arrangements: An application of the net transition probability macrosimulation model. Journal of Population Research 24, 227–251 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031932

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031932

Keywords

Navigation