Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning objects, learning design, and adoption through succession

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

THIS PAPER examines the concept of learning objects, the advantages they offer, and related issues. Learning objects focus on content, while the Learning Design specification addresses pedagogy. Underlying both of these approaches is the motivation to reuse, which has cost and quality benefits. Despite these benefits, adoption of the two approaches has not impacted on everyday practice. The process of technology succession is suggested as a method by which these two approaches may increase their adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berge, Z. (1997). Computer conferencing and the on-line classroom.International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 3(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britain, S. (2004, May).A Review of learning design: Concept, specifications and tools. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Retrieved September 29, 2006, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ACF83C.doc.

  • Carson, S. (2005).MIT CCW evaluation findings. Retrieve September 29, 2006, from http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/90C9BC91-7819-48A0-9E9A-D6B2701C1CE5/0 /MIT_OCW_2004_Program_Eval.pdf.

  • Downes, S. (2001). Learning objects: Resources for distance education worldwide.International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved September 5, 2006, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/32/378

  • Downes, S. (2003).Design, standards and reusability. Retrieved September 29, 2006, from http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/website/view.cgi?dbs=Article&key=1059622263.

  • Duncan, C. (2003). Granularisation. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.),Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to elearning (pp. 12–19). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, N. (2001). What are educational objects?Interactive Learning Environments, 9(3), 219–230. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from http://www.careo.org/documents/objects.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, H.G.K., Manderveld, J.M., Tattersall, C. & Koper, E.J.R. (2004). Educational modelling language and learning design: New opportunities for instructional reusability and personalised learningInternational Journal of Learning Technology, 1(1), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMS (2003a).IMS learning design best practice and implementation guide. Retrieved September 29, 2006, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/ imsld_bestv1p0.html.

  • IMS (2003b).IMS learning design information model. IMS Global. Retrieved September 29, 2006, from http://www.imsproject.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/ imsld_infov1p0.html.

  • Neven, F., & Duval, E. (2002, December 1–6). Reusable learning objects: A survey of LOM-based repositories.Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia 2002 (pp. 107–114). Juan Les Pins, France. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/≈hmdb/publications/files/pdfversion/41249.pdf.

  • OECD (2005). E-learning in tertiary education: Where do we stand?Education & Skill, (4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehak, D.R., & Mason, R.D. (2003). Keeping the learning in learning objects. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.),Reusing Educational Resources for Networked Learning (pp. 20–34). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, J.B., & Monson, D.W. (2000). A university-wide system for creating, capturing, and delivering learning objects. In D.A. Wiley (Ed.),The Instructional Use of Learning objects: Online Version. Retrieved September 29, 2006, from http:// reusability.org/read/chapters/south.doc.

  • Strijker, A. (2004).Reuse of learning objects in context. Human and technical aspects. PhD Dissertation. Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands. Retrieved September 4, 2006, from http://www.actapress.com/ Reference.aspx?paperld=20499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M.J., Pegler, C.A., & Mason, R.D. (2003). Putting the pieces together: What working with learning objects means for the educator.Elearn International. Edinburgh. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from iet.open.ac.uk/pp/c.a.pegler/ukeu/edinburgh.doc.

  • Weller, M.J. (2004). Learning objects and e-learning cost dilemma.Open Learning, 19(3), 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, P., & Wilde, R. (2005). Learning objects in a box: Developing a university course for on-line delivery based on learning objects: From ideals to compromises.Open Learning, 20(1) 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W., Olivier, B., Jeyes, S., Powell, A., & Franklin, T. (2004).A technical framework to support e-learning. JISC. Weller, M.J. (2003). Retrieved September 23, 2006, from http:/ /www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Technical%20Framework%20feb04.doc

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Martin Weller

    Present address: The Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University, MK7 6AA, Milton Keynes, England

Authors and Affiliations

    Authors
    1. Martin Weller
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Additional information

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR Martin Weller is Professor of Educational Technology at the Open University in the U.K. He was Director for the VLE project at the Open University and has chaired several e-learning courses. His research interests include learning environments, new technologies, learning design, and the implications of e-learning for higher education. Dr. Weller has published numerous articles in these areas and is the author of the textbookDelivering Learning on the Net. His new book on VLEs is scheduled for publication in 2007. Dr. Weller is currently the Project Director for the D4LD project that is developing a Learning Design player.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Weller, M. Learning objects, learning design, and adoption through succession. J. Comput. High. Educ. 19, 26–47 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033418

    Download citation

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033418

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation