Skip to main content
Log in

Online lotgenotencontactgroepen: de aantrekkingskracht van steun via het internet

  • Artikelen
  • Published:
Psychologie en Gezondheid, jaargang 2007

semenvatting

This study investigates what it is in health-related forums that attracts people to make use of them, and how people feel that using these forums helps them in coping with the situation they are facing. Results are based on an online questionnaire (N = 166) among users of a variety of health forums. Findings show that features that are often mentioned in literature on computer-mediated communication (i.e., the anonymity it affords, the text-based character it has, and the possibility it offers to network expansion) are recognized, but appreciated differently by users that vary in the degree to which they perceive to suffer from a stigmatized condition or are restricted in their mobility. Stigmatization is related to appreciation of anonymity, and restriction of mobility to network expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figuur 1
Figuur 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sommige forums faciliteren ook synchrone real-time interactie (chatten) als toevoeging op het asynchrone format.

  2. Een complete lijst van forums kan verkregen worden bij de auteur.

Literatuur

  • Albrecht, T. L., & Goldsmith, D. J. (2003). Social support, social networks, and health. In T. L. Thompson, A. M. Dorsey, K. I. Miller & R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 263-284). Hillsdale, NK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). Amos 6.0 [computer software]. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573-590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bordia, P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 99-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11, 123-151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. D., Rossmann, M. M., McCubbin, M. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1988). Examining the definition and assessment of social support: A resource for individuals and families. Family Relations, 37, 211-216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, K. P., Pennebaker, J. W., & Dickerson, S. S. (2000). Who talks: The social psychology of illness support groups. American Psychologist, 55, 205-217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, B. A., Turk, C. L., Heimberg, R. G., Fresco, D. M., & Hantula, D. A. (2004). The Internet: Home to a severe population of individuals with social anxiety disorder? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 18, 629-646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., & Stern, A. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal, 328, 1166-1170A.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. (1999). An exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability. Health & Social Work, 24, 220-231.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J., & Banach, M. (2000). Victimization online: The down side of seeking human services for women on the Internet. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 243-254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S. (1993). Being and feeling unique: Statistical deviance and psychological marginality. Journal of Personality, 61, 85-110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J., Flanagin, A. J., Kalman, M. E., Monge, P. R., & Ryan, T. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory, 6, 60-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28, 325-347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., & Kahn, R. L. (1985). Measures and concepts of social support. In S. Cohen & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 83-108). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S. A., & Moreggi, D. (1998). Internet therapy and self help groups- the pros and cons. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet. Intrapersonal, Interpersonal and Transpersonal Implications (pp. 77-106). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationship over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madara, E. J. (1997). The mutual-aid self-help online revolution. Social Policy, 97, 20-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity ‘demarginalization’ through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681-694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction) Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. K., & Gergen, K. J. (1998). Life on the line: The therapeutic potentials of computer-mediated conversation. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 24, 189-202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, M., R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effect of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J. J., & Ghozati, K. (2001). Experiencing empathy on-line. In R. E. Rice & E. Katz (Eds.), The Internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations (pp. 237-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E. (2006). Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: Multivariate results from the Pew surveys. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75, 8-28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., & Gattiker, U., E. (2001). New media and organizational structuring. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new Handbook of Organizational Communication (pp. 544-581). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., Lea, M., & Postmes, T. (2001). Social psychological theories of computer-mediated communication: Social gain or social pain? In H. Giles & P. Robinson (Eds.), New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp. 601-624). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swickert, R. J., Hittner, J. B., Harris, J. L., & Herring, J. A. (2002). Relationships among Internet use, personality, and social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 437-451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanis, M. (2007). Online social support groups. In A. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes & U. D. Reips (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (pp. 139-153). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support: Where are we? What next. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 53-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J., B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, N., Schmale, J., Uken, J., & Wessel, K. (1995). Computer-mediated support groups. Social Work With Groups, 17, 43-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A. (1985). Supportive functions of interpersonal relationships. In S. Cohen & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 61-82). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. B. (2000). Perceptions of on-line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on-line support groups. Communication Quarterly, 48, 44-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. B., & Bell, S. B. (2003). Health-related support groups on the Internet: Linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 39-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., & Suman, M. (2006). Help seeking behavior and the Internet: A national survey. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75, 29-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Martin Tanis is universitair docent bij de afdeling communicatiewetenschap van de Vrije Universiteit.

Correspondentieadres: Martin Tanis, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV, Amsterdam.

E-mailadres: ma.tanis@fsw.vu.nl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanis, M. Online lotgenotencontactgroepen: de aantrekkingskracht van steun via het internet. PSEG 35, 210–217 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03071801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03071801

Navigation