Abstract
This article outlines the enormous technological advances that have taken place in the practice of radiology in Australasia in the 30 years since approximately 1977. These developments have led to significant improvements in image quality across all modalities, including even general radiography, which had as its genesis Roentgen’s ground-breaking discovery of X-rays in 1895. However, nowhere has the development been more dramatic than in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This may be brought into stark reality by noting that the first MRI image of a human finger was produced in 1976 followed one year later by that of a human chest and the first MRI units were not installed in Australia and New Zealand until 1986 and 1991, respectively. The quality of these early images would be judged as laughable by today’s standards where the impressive isotropic imaging that can be achieved at sub-millimetre level by both MRI and CT could not have been dreamed of 30 years ago. The review also highlights some challenges for the future of the medical physics profession.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Special 50th Anniversary Issue of Physics in Medicine and Biology, Phys. Med. Biol., 51 (13): 2006.
Heggie, J.C.P.,A survey of doses to patients in a large public hospital resulting from common plain film radiographic procedures, Austral. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 13: 71–80, 1990.
Hart, D., Hillier, M.C. and Wall, B.F.,Doses to patients from medical x-ray examinations in the UK-2000 Review, National Radiological Protection Board, Didcot, NRPB-W14, 2002.
Sonoda, M., Takano, M., Miyohara, J. and Kato, H.,Computed Radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence, Radiol., 148: 833–838, 1983.
Heggie, J.C.P. and Wilkinson, L.E.,Radiation doses from common radiographic procedures: A ten year perspective, Austral. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 23: 124–133, 2000.
Pratt, H.M., Langlotz, C.P., Feingold, E.R. et al.,Incremental cost of department-wide implementation of a picture archiving and communication system and Computed Radiography, Radiol., 206: 245–252, 1998.
Becker, S.H. and Arenson, R.L.,Costs and benefits of picture archiving and communication systems, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 1: 361–371, 1994.
Heggie, J.C.P., Liddell, N.A. and Maher, K.P.,Applied Imaging Technology, 4th Edition, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, 2001: 232–240.
Crummy, A.B., Strother, C.M., Sackett, J.F. et al,Computerized fluoroscopy: Digital subtraction for intravenous angiocardiography and arteriography, AJR, 135: 1131–1140, 1980.
Mistretta, C.A., Kruger, R.A., Ergun, D.L. et al,Digital vascular imaging, Medicamundi, 26: 1–10, 1980.
Mistretta, C.A., Crummy, A.B. and Strother, C.M.,Digital angiography: A perspective, Radiol., 139: 273–276, 1981.
Verhoeven, L.,Digital Cardiac Imaging, Medicamundi, 32: 111–116, 1987.
Behling, R.,The MRC 200: A new high output X-ray tube, Medicamundi, 35: 57–64, 1990.
Homberg, R. and Koppel, R.,An X-ray tube assembly with rotating anode spiral groove bearing of the 2nd generation, Electromedica, 66: 65–66, 1997.
Gruentzig, A.R.,Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, Semin. Roentgen., 16: 152–153, 1981.
Gruentzig, A.R. and Meier, B.,Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The first five years and the future, Int. J. Cardiol., 2: 319–323, 1983.
Senes, S. and Davies, J.,Coronary angioplasty in Australia 1996. Australian Institute of Health Cat. No. CVD 9. Canberra, 1999.
Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand,Medical electrical equipment-Particular requirements for safety-X-ray equipment for interventional procedures, AS/NZS 3200.2.43, 2002.
Kalendar, W.A., Seissler, W. and Vock, P.,Singlebreathhold spiral volumetric CT by continuous patient translation and scanner rotation, Radiol., 173: 414, 1989.
Kalendar, W.A., Seissler, W, Klotz, E. and Vock, P.,Spiral volumetric CT with single breathhold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation, Radiol., 176: 181–183, 1990.
Flohr, T., Stierstorfer, K., Bruder, H., et al,Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 16-slice CT scanner, Med. Phys., 30: 832–45, 2003.
Flohr, T.G., Stierstorfer, K., Ulzheimer, S. et al,Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot, Med. Phys., 32: 2536–2547, 2005
Lewis, M., Keat, N., and Edyvean, S.,32 to 64 slice CT scanner comparison report version 14, NHS report 0613, February 2006
Schardt, P., Deuringer, J., Freudenberger, J. et al,New x-ray tube performance in computed tomography by introducing the rotating envelope tube technology, Med. Phys., 31: 2699–2706, 2004.
Mansfield, P. and Maudsley, A.A.,Line scan proton spin imaging in biological structures by NMR, Phys. Med. Biol., 21: 847–852, 1976
Damadian, R., Goldsmith, M. and Minkoff, L.,NMR in cancer: XVI. Fonar image of the live human body, Physiol. Chem. Phys., 9: 97–100, 1977.
Braun, M. and McCarthy, A.L.,NMR images in substantially non-uniform fields, Austral. Radiol. 29: 67–70, 1985.
Wedeen, W., Meuli, R., Edeleman, R. et al, Projectiveimaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonance, Science, 230: 946–948, 1985.
Dumoulin, C.L., Souza, S.P. and Feng, H.,Multiecho magnetic resonance angiography, Magn. Reson. Med., 5, 47–57, 1987.
Dumoulin, C.L., Souza, S.P. and Hart, H.R.,Rapid scan magnetic resonance angiography, Magn. Reson. Med., 5: 238–245, 1987.
Ogawa, S., Lee, T.-M., Nayak, A. S. and Glynn, P.,Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields, Magn. Reson. Med., 14: 68–78, 1990.
Ogawa, S., Lee, T.M., Kay, A.R. and Tank, D.W.,Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 87: 9868–9872, 1990.
Belliveau, J.W., Cohen, M.S., Weisskoff, R.M. et al,Functional studies of the human brain using high-speed magnetic resonance imaging, J. Neuroimaging, 1: 36–41, 1991.
Rosen, B.R., Belliveau, J.W., Aronen, H.J. et al,Susceptibility contrast imaging of cerebral blood volume: human experience, Magn. Reson. Med., 22: 293–299, 1991.
Belliveau, J.W., Kennedy, D.N. Jr., McKinstry, R.C. et al,Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging, Science, 254: 716–719, 1991.
Leach, M.O.,Review: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in the investigation of cancer in the Royal Marsden Hospital and the Institute of Cancer research, Phys. Med. Biol., 51: R61-R82, 2006.
Conway, B.J., McCrohan, J.L., Rueter, F.G. and Suleiman, O.H.,Mammography in the eighties, Radiol., 177: 335–339, 1990.
Feig S.A.,Decreased breast cancer mortality through mammographic screening: results of clinical trials, Radiol., 167: 659–665, 1988.
Wald, N.J., Chamberlain, J. and Hackshaw, A.,European Society of Mastology Consensus Conference on breast cancer screening: report of the evaluation committee, Br. J. Radiol.. 67: 925–933, 1994.
Shen, Y., Yang, Y., Inoue, L.Y. et al,Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival; analysis of randomized screening trials, J. Nat. Canc. Inst. 97: 1195–1203 2005.
Pisano, E.D., Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E, et al,Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breastcancer screening, New Eng. J. Med., 353: 1773–1783, 2005.
Aslund, M., Cederstrom, B., Lundqvist, M. and Danielsson, M.,AEC for scanning digital mammography based on variation of scan velocity, Med. Phys., 32: 3367–3374, 2005.
Aslund, M., Cederstrom, B., Lundqvist, M. and Danielsson, M.,Scatter rejection in multislit digital mammography, Med. Phys., 33: 933–940, 2006.
Carpenter, D., Kossoff, G., Garrett, W.J. et al,The UI Octoson-a new class of ultrasonic echoscope, Austral. Radiol., 21: 85–89, 1977.
Wells, P.N.T,Review: Ultrasound imaging, Phys. Med. Biol., 51: R83-R98, 2006.
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency,Code of practice in the medical applications of ionizing radiation, ARPANSA RPSxx, 200x.
International Commission on Radiological Protection,Radiological protection and safety in medicine, ICRP Publication 73, Annals of the ICRP, 26 (2): 1996.
National Radiological Protection Board,Guidelines on patient dose to promote the optimisation of protection for diagnostic medical exposures, Documents of the NRPB, 10 (1): 1999.
Workman, A. and Cowen, A.R.,Exposure monitoring in photostimulable phosphor computed radiography, Rad. Prot. Dosim., 43: 135–138, 1992.
International Commission on Radiological Protection,Managing patient dose in digital radiography, ICRP Publication 93, Annals of the ICRP, 34 (1): 2004.
Heggie, J.C.P., Patientdoses in multi-slice CT and the importance of optimisation, Austral. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 28: 86–96, 2005.
Heggie, J.C.P., Kay, J.K. and Lee, W.K.,Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols, Austral. Radiol., 50: 278–285, 2006.
Nagel, H.D. (ed)Radiation exposure in computed tomography: fundamentals, influencing parameters, dose assessment, optimisation, scanner data terminology, CTB Publications, Hamburg, 2002.
Kalra, M.K., Maher, M.M., Toth, T.L. et al,Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization, Radiol., 230: 619–628, 2004.
International Commission on Radiological Protection,Educational Power Point Template on Managing Patient Dose in Computed Tomography, 2001 Available on the ICRP web site at http://www.icrp.org/educational_area.asp.
International Commission on Radiological Protection,Managing patient dose in computed tomography, ICRP Publication 87, Annals of the ICRP, 30 (4): 2000.
US Food and Drug Administration, FDA Public Health Advisory:Avoidance of serious x-ray-induced skin injuries to patients during fluoroscopically-guided procedures, September 30, 1994.
Vano, E., Arranz, L., Sastre, J.M. et al,Dosimetric and radiation protection considerations based on some cases of patient skin injuries in interventional cardiology, Brit. J. Radiol., 71: 510–516, 1998.
Koenig, T.R., Wolff, D., Mettler, F.A. and Wagner, L.K.,Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: Part 1, Characteristics of radiation injury, AJR, 177: 3–12, 2001.
Koenig, T.R, Mettler, F.A., and Wagner, L.K.,Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: Part 2, Review of 73 cases and recommendations for minimizing dose delivered to patient, AJR, 177: 13–20, 2001.
Vano, E., Gonzalez, L., Beneytez, F. and Moreno, F.,Lens injuries induced by occupational exposure in non-optimized interventional radiology laboratories, Brit. J. Radiol., 71: 728–733, 1998.
Haskal, Z.J. and Worgul, B.V.,Interventional Radiology Carries Occupational Risk for Cataracts, RSNA News, 14: 5–6, 2004.
Poletti, J.L.,Radiation injury to skin following a cardiac interventional procedure, Austral. Radiol., 41: 82–83, 1997.
International Commission on Radiological Protection,Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85, Annals of the ICRP, 30 (2): 2000.
Round, W.H.A survey of the Australasian clinical medical physics and biomedical engineering workforce, Austral. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 30: 13–24, 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heggie, J.C.P. Technical developments in radiology in Australasia dating from 1977. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 30, 160–177 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178423
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178423