Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relevant, challenging, integrative and exploratory curriculum design: Perspectives from theory and practice for middle level schooling in Australia

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrative curriculum design promises much for middle level teachers who wish to develop classroom programmes that will encourage early adolescents to actively engage in their learning (Beane 1990, 1997). Beane’s model is highly responsive to the educational and developmental needs of young people. In contrast, multidisciplinary curriculum design (Jacobs 1989) may result in significant but largely unrecognised drawbacks when it is implemented in the middle grades.

This paper critically examines the theory of the integrative and the multidisciplinary models of curriculum integration with respect to middle level curriculum reform in Australian schools. It draws its data from a doctoral study (Dowden 2007) that traced a century of development of curriculum integration in the USA: from Dewey’s Laboratory School a century ago through to contemporary middle schooling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikin, W. (1942)The story of the Eight Year Study, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anfara Jr, V. A. and Lipka, R. P. (2003) Relating the middle school concept to student achievement,Middle School Journal, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (1993)Official knowledge: democratic education in a conservative age, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (2001)Educating the ‘right’ way: markets, standards, God and Inequality, Routledge-Falmer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. (1997) High expectations for all,Middle School Journal, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 51–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, C. (1995) Pushing the envelope: what curriculum integration can be, in E. N. Brazee and J. Capelluti, eds.,Dissolving boundaries: toward integrative curriculum, National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (1980) The general education we need,Educational Leadership, vol. 37, January, pp. 307–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (1990)A middle school curriculum: from rhetoric to reality, National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (1993)A middle school curriculum: from rhetoric to reality, 2nd edn., National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (1997)Curriculum integration: designing the core of democratic education, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (1999a) Middle schools under siege: points of attack,Middle School Journal, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (1999b) Middle schools under siege: responding to the attack,Middle School Journal, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (2001) Introduction: reform and reinvention, in T. S. Dickinson,Reinventing the middle school, Routledge-Falmer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (2002) Beyond self-interest: a democratic core curriculum,Educational Leadership, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (2004) Creating quality in the middle school curriculum, in S. C. Thompson, ed.,Reforming middle level education: considerations for policymakers, National Middle School Association, Westerville, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. (2006) Why middle schools?New Zealand Middle Schooling Review, Issue 2 (November), pp. 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. and Brodhagen, B. L. (2001) Teaching in middle schools, in V. Richardson, ed.,Handbook of research on teaching, 4th edn., American Educational Research Association, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, K. L. (1998) Are we missing the point about curriculum integration?,Middle School Journal, vol. 29, March, pp. 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971) On the classification and framing of educational knowledge, in M. F. D. Young, ed.,Knowledge and control, pp. 47–69. McMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1999)Teaching for quality learning at university, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomer, G. (1982)Negotiating the curriculum, The Falmer Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazee, E. N. (1997) Curriculum for whom?, in J. L. Irvin, ed.,What current research says to the middle level practitioner, National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazee, E. N. and Capelluti, J. (1995)Dissolving boundaries: toward integrative Curriculum, National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2005) Learning collaboratively, in D. Pendergast and N. Bahr, eds.,Teaching middle years: rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, V. (2006)Rethinking middle years: early adolescents, schooling and digital Culture, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadbourne, R. and Pendergast, D. (2005) The philosophy of middle schooling, in D. Pendergast and N. Bahr, eds.,Teaching middle years: rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2003)Why is it so hard to get good schools? Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis Jnr., O. L. (1997) The personal nature of curricular integration,Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, vol.12, no. 2, pp. 95–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Tasmania. (2002)Essential learnings framework 1, Department of Education, Hobart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1900)The school and society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1902)The child and the curriculum, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916)Democracy and education, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1931) The way out of educational confusion, in R. G. Archambault, ed., (1964)John Dewey on education: selected writings, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1936) The theory of the Chicago experiment, in K. C. Mayhew and A. C. Edwards, (1936/1965)The Dewey School, Atherton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, T. (2007) Curriculum integration for early adolescent schooling in Aotearoa New Zealand: worthy of serious trial, unpublished doctoral thesis, Massey University, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. M. (1993)Planning integrated curriculum: the call to adventure, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, P. L. (1958) The meaning and significance of integration, in N. B. Henry, ed.,The integration of educational experiences, 57th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part III, pp. 3–25, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland. (2001) “New basics project”, retrieved July 8, 2007. http://education.qld.gov.au/corporate/newbasics/index.html

  • Ellis, A. K. and Stuen, C. J. (1998)The interdisciplinary curriculum, Eye on Education, Larchmont, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (1980) Curriculum mapping,Educational Leadership, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 558–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erb, T. O. (1996) Following the bandwagon of curriculum integration: beautiful music or deep ruts?,Middle School Journal, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson, C. & McVittie, J. (2001) Student voices on integrative curriculum,Middle School Journal, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felner, R. D., Jackson, A. W., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S. and Flowers, N. (1997) The impact of school reform for the middle years,Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 528–532, 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, N. (2002) In their own ways,Educational Leadership, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, R. (1991)The mindful school: how to integrate the curricula, Hawker Brownlow Education, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. (2000) Curriculum integration: what it is and what it is not,SET, vol. 3, pp. 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke, N. J. (1998) A look at curriculum integration from the bridge.Curriculum Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardingham, R. (2005) Foreword, in D. Pendergast and N. Bahr, eds.,Teaching middle years: rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattam, R. (2006)Easier said than done: ‘strong connectedness’ in the middle years, paper presented at AARE Annual Conference, Adelaide.

  • Hattam, R., Zipin, L. and Prosser, B. (2006) “Redesigning pedagogies in the North”, retrieved July 16. http://www.literacy.unisa.edu.au/rpin/documents/RPIN%20Update%201.pdf>

  • Hopkins, L. T., ed. (1937)Integration: its meaning and application, Appleton-Century, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, L. T. (1941)Integration: the democratic process, Heath, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, L. T. (1954)The emerging self in school and home, Harper & Brothers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L. and Park, N. (2005) Negotiating curriculum, in D. Pendergast and N. Bahr, eds.,Teaching middle years: rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. H., ed. (1989)Interdisciplinary curriculum: design and implementation, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. H. (1991) Planning for curriculum integration,Educational Leadership, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. H. (1997)Mapping the big picture: integrating curriculum and assessment, Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielsmeier, J. C. (2000) A time to serve, a time to learn — learning and the promise of democracy,Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 652–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliebard, H. M. (1995)The struggle for the American curriculum 1893–1958, 2nd edn., Routledge and Paul, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, K. (1994) “Integrated curriculum”, retrieved February 5, 2006. http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/8/c016.html

  • Lounsbury, J. H. and Vars, G. F. (1978)A curriculum for the middle school years, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Elkins, J., Weir, K., Land, R., Carrington, V., Dole, S., Pendergast, D., Kapitzke, C., van Kraayenoord, C., Moni, K., McIntosh, A., Mayer, D., Bahr, M., Hunter, L., Chadbourne, R., Bean, T., Alverman, D. and Stevens, L. (2003) “Beyond the middle: a report about literacy and numeracy development of target group students in the middle years of schooling”, (Department of Education, Science and Training), retrieved July 12, 2007. http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/E06AD41C-5FC9-4F59-A45D-0DF1A7806D4C/1597/BeyondtheMiddleMainReport.pdf>

  • Matters, P. (2006)Educational leadership, powerful pedagogies and the middle years of schooling (Yrs 5–9), paper presented at AARE Annual Conference, Adelaide.

  • Meeth, L. R. (1978) Interdisciplinary studies: integration of knowledge and experience,Change, vol. 10, pp. 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, S. B. and Flowers, N. (2003) Middle school practices improve student achievement in high poverty schools,Middle School Journal, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, K. and Hornsby, D. (1997) Planning curriculum connections: whole-school planning for integrated curriculum, Eleanor Curtain, Armadale, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Middle School Association. (1995)This we believe: developmentally responsive middle level schools, National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Middle School Association. (2003)This we believe: successful schools for young Adolescents, Westerville, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. and McKinnon, D. (2003) Enhancing the middle in a New Zealand secondary school: integration, experiential learning and computer use,International Journal of Educational Reform, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 230–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, P., Homestead, E. and McGinnis, K. (1997) Making integrated curriculum work: teachers, students, and the quest for coherent curriculum, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigdon, K. and Woolley, M., eds. (1992)The big picture: integrating children’s Learning, Eleanor Curtain, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitton, D. E. (2001) The school and the child and the child in the school,Middle School Journal, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. R., Fussell, L., Troutman, P., Smith, M. and Skoog, G. (1998) The Brown Barge experience: toward an integrative multicultural learning environment,Middle School Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. R. and Skoog, G. (1995) Students’ perspectives of integrative curricula: the case of Brown Barge Middle School,Research in Middle-level Education Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. R., Skoog, G., Troutman, P. and Jones, C. (1996) Sustaining a nonlinear integrative learning context: middle level teachers’ perspectives,Research in Middlelevel Education Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 23–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schine, J. (1997) Service learning and young adolescents: a good fit, in J. L. Irvin, ed.,What current research says to the middle level practitioner, National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, T. R. (2001) No two are quite alike,Educational Leadership, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Blaise, B., Mann, L. and Myers, D. (1993) The Big Alpha Circus, in C. Stevenson and J. F. Carr, eds.,Integrated studies in the middle grades: dancing through walls, pp. 147–154, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snapp, J. (2006) Implementing curriculum integration in standards-based middle schools: the principal’s role, National Middle School Association, Westerville, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Queensland, Department of Education. (2001)The Queensland school reform longitudinal study, Department of Education, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C. (2002)Teaching ten to fourteen year olds, 3rd edn., Allyn & Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, L. N. (1997)Dewey’s laboratory school: lessons for today, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D. and Tobin, W. (1994) The “grammar” of schooling: why has it been so hard to change?American Educational Research Journal, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 453–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (1949)Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2007) “Re-imaging science education; engaging students in science for Australia’s future”, (ACER), retrieved July 15, 2007. http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/AER51_ReimaginingSciEdu.pdf>

  • Vars, G. F. (1991) Integrated curriculum in historical perspective,Educational Leadership, vol. 49, number 2, pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vars, G. F. (1993)Interdisciplinary teaching: why and how, 2nd edn., National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vars, G. F. (1997) Effects of integrative curriculum and instruction, in J. L. Irvin, ed.,What current research says to the middle level practitioner, National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vars, G. F. (1998) ‘You’ve come a long way, baby!’, in R. David, ed.,Moving forward from the past: early writings and current reflections of middle school founders, National Middle School Association, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J., Venville, G. and Rennie, L. J. (2005) Integrating the curriculum, in D. Pendergast and N. Bahr, eds.,Teaching middle years: rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wraga, W. G. (1997) Patterns of interdisciplinary curriculum organization and professional knowledge of the curriculum field,Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, vol.12, no. 2, pp. 98–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyngier, D. (2004)Engaging pedagogies and pedagogues — what does student engagement look like in action? paper presented at Doing the Public Good: Positioning Educational Research AARE International Conference, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyngier, D. (2006)(Re)conceptualising connectedness as a pedagogy of engagement, paper presented at AARE Annual Conference, Adelaide.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tasmania, Australia

    Tony Dowden

Authors
  1. Tony Dowden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dowden, T. Relevant, challenging, integrative and exploratory curriculum design: Perspectives from theory and practice for middle level schooling in Australia. Aust. Educ. Res. 34, 51–71 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216857

Keywords

Search

Navigation