Abstract
This article examines a Victorian high school’s implementation of a new Year 9 program which was intended to interrupt a traditional academic curriculum and to create an imagined oasis of care and personal development for students. It explores ways in which (1) the existing culture and context of the school continues to frame the subjectivities of teachers, students and parents in relation to the new program, (2) the attempt to preserve a competitive academic traditional orientation alongside an alternative approach is a central dilemma for this school, and (3) the new relationships between teachers and students are experienced by them as an interplay of pleasure and surveillance, connection and discipline. The article argues that the conflicts and pressures experienced by the teachers and students are not simply local and contingent ones but indicative of wider tensions in current Australian education policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Training. (2002).Boys getting it right: Report on the inquiry into the education of boys. Canberra: Report for House of Parliament.
Bahr, N. M., & Pendergast, D. (2005).Teaching middle years: Rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Barber, T. (2002). “A special duty of care”: Exploring the narration and experience of teacher caring.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 383–395.
Braggett, E. J., Day, A., & Morris, G. (1999).Reforming the middle years of schooling. Cheltenham, Vic: Hawker-Brownlow Education.
Campagna, J., Comber, B., Comber, K., Cormack, P., Dilena, M., & Perkins, K. (1989).Literacy and learning in the middle years project. Adelaide: Education Department of South Australia, South Australian College of Advanced Education, Catholic Education Office and Independent Schools Board.
Carrington, V. (2006).Rethinking the middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Centre for Applied Educational Research. (2002).Middle years research and development (MYRAD) project. Melbourne: Report for Faculty of Education, University of Melbourne.
Cole, P., Mahar, S. & Vindurampulle, O. (2006).Understanding year 9 students: Implications for policy and practice, Part B. Report for Research and Innovation Division, Office of Learning and Teaching, Department of Education and Training Victoria. Melbourne: DET.
Cormack, P. (1998). Middle schooling: for which adolescent?Curriculum Perspectives, 18(1), 56–60.
Cumming, J., & Cormack, P. (1996).From Alienation to Engagement: Opportunities for Reform in the Middle Years of Schooling, Belconnen, A.C.T.: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
Department Of Education Employment and Training (DEET). (1999).The Middle Years: A Guide For Strategic Action In Years 5–9. Melbourne: Department of Education, Employment and Training.
Fielding, M. (2000). Community, philosophy and education policy: Against effectiveness ideology and the immiseration of contemporary schooling.Journal of Educational Policy, 15(4), 397–415.
Gordon, T., Holland, J., & Lahelma, E. (2001). Ethnographic research in educational settings. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland & L. Lofland (Eds.),Handbook of ethnography. London: Sage.
Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984).Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
Hill, P. W., & Russell, V. J. (1999).Systematic, whole-school reform of the middle years of schooling. Paper presented to National Conference on Middle Schooling, Melbourne.
Hunter, I. (1994)Re-thinking the school: Subjectivity, bureaucracy, criticism. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Luke, A. (2003).Beyond the middle: A report about literacy and numeracy development of target group students in the middle years of schooling. Report for Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training. Canberra: DEST.
McLeod, J., & Yates, L. (2006).Making modern lives: Schooling, subjectivity and social change. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Neill, A. S. (1953).The free child. London: Herbert Jenkins.
Neill, A. S. (1968).Summerhill. London: Penguin.
Noddings, N. (2003).Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
O’Loughlin, M. (2006).Embodiment and education: Exploring creatural existence. New York: Springer.
Oakley, A. (1980). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In H. Roberts (Ed.),Doing feminist research. London: Routledge.
Rose, N. (1989).Governing of the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
Smyth, J., McInerney, P., & Hattam, R. (2003). Tackling school leaving at its source: A case of reform in the middle years of schooling.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 177–193.
Yates, L. (1999). Transitions and the year 7 experience.Australian Journal of Education, 43(1), 38–55.
Yates, L., & McLeod, J. (2000). Social justice and the middle.Australian Education Researcher, 27(3), 59–78.
Yates, L., & McLeod, J. (2007).12 to 18: A qualitative longitudinal study of students, values and difference in Australian schools. Deakin West ACT: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yates, L., Holt, B. “Under pressure I fall back to being a teacher…” confronting contending desires for schooling and teaching in a middle school reform project. Aust. Educ. Res. 36, 27–42 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216890
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216890