Skip to main content
Log in

Chinese students’ perception of out-of-class groupwork in Australia

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite increasing number of mainland Chinese students studying in western tertiary settings, there is limited information available on their learning experiences and responses to popular educational practices in these contexts. There is an assumption in the literature that Chinese students respond well to the collaborative demands of groupwork due to the collectivist nature of their culture, however there are few reports to substantiate this claim. This paper reports on mainland Chinese students’ perception of groupwork in two Australian tertiary settings. Thirteen students from mainland China were interviewed on their groupwork experiences. All interviews were completed in either Mandarin or Cantonese. Two types of groupwork were identified: assignment groupwork (AGW) and student generated groupwork (SGGW). Three criteria for collaboration: level of interaction, construction of knowledge and a shared goal were used to search for signs of collaborative elements in the Chinese students’ recall of their groupwork experience. Indicators of collaboration were identified in the reports of AGWs but were less consistent in SGGWs. The findings of this study suggest that Chinese students perceive out-of-class groupwork in an Australian context as a positive learning experience, reporting enhanced understanding of academic contents, application of knowledge and socializing with other Chinese students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Education International (2007). 2007 Pivot Tables. Retrieved April 16th, 2007, from http://aei.dest.gov.au/AEI/MIP/Statistics/StudentEnrolmentAndVisaStatistics/2007/Default.htm#pivot

  • Barnes, M. (2003). Collaborative learning in senior mathematics classrooms: Issues of gender and power in student-student interactions. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

  • Biggs, J. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. In M. Krantzig (Ed.),Eighth Australian learning and language conference (pp. 1–51). Queensland, Australia: Queensland University of Technology Counselling Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1996). Western misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds.),The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 45–67). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee, K. A. (1999).Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdett, J. (2007). Degrees of separation — Balancing intervention and independence in group work assignments.The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(1), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y-Y. G., & Watkins, D. (1994). Classroom environment and approaches to learning: An investigation of the actual and preferred perceptions of Hong Kong Secondary School Students [Electronic version].Instructional Science, 22(3), 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2003). International comparative studies in mathematics education. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.),Second international handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. J., & Xu, L.H. (2008). Distinguishing between mathematics classrooms in Australia, China, Japan, Korea and the USA through the lens of the distribution of responsibility for knowledge generation: Public oral interactivity versus mathematical orality.ZDM — The International Journal in Mathematics Education, 40(6), 963–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deen, H. (1998).Broken Bangles. Sydney: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, J. W. (1995).Growing a Japanese science city: Communication in scientific research. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Granott, N. (1993). Patterns of interaction in the co-construction of knowledge: Separate minds, joint effort, and environments. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.),Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 183–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, E. F. (1999).The managerial decision-making process (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X. (2006). The concept of the relational self and its implications for education.Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 33(4), 543–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991).Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4.). Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C. G., James, R.H., Lye, J. N., & McDonald, I. M. (2000). An Evaluation of collaborative problem solving for learning economics [Electronic version].The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L., & Miles, L. (2004). Assessing contributions to group assignments.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 751–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, E. (2009). Improving student teamwork in a collaborative project-based course.College Teaching, 57(3), 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell and G. Symon (Eds.),Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Group project work and student-centred active learning: Two different experiences.Studies in Higher education, 25(3), 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. & Hubeman, A. M., (1994).An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivera, F., & Strauss, S. (2004). Group-to-individual transfer of learning-cognitive and social factors.Small Group Research, 35(4), 440–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., Sullivan, A., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts [Electronic version].Theory into Practice, 41, 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panitz, T. (1996). A definition of collaborative vs. cooperative learning. Retrieved February 18, 2006, from http://www.city.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/collab.learning/panitz2.html

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002).Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulusz, W. (2004). Identifying and providing culturally relevant support services to international students. Retrieved March 9, 2007 from the Deakin University website: http://www.deakin.edu.au/studentlife/counselling

  • Ramburuth, P., & McCormick, J. (2001). Learning diversity in higher education: A comparative study of Asian international and Australian students.Higher Education, 42(3), 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remedios, L. (2005). Experiences and responses of overseas-educated students to problem-based learning and its classroom culture in an Australian physiotherapy context. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.

  • Remedios, L., Clarke, D., & Hawthorne, L. (2008). Framing collaborative behaviours: Listening and speaking in problem-based learning.Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning,1(2), article 3. Retrieved July 9, 2008, from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol2/iss1/3

  • Strauss, P., & U, A. (2007). Group assessment: Dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms.Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (2001). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs.Language Research Forum, 5(1), 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K. C. C. (1993). Spontaneous collaborative learning: A new dimension in student learning experience?Higher Education Research & Development, 12(1), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. (1996). How Hong Kong students cope with assessment. In D. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds.),The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 159–182). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tani, M. (2005). Quiet, but only in class: Reviewing the in-class participation of Asian students. Retrieved December 29, 2007, from http://conference.herdsa.org.au/2005/pdf/non_refereed/030.pdf

  • Tiong, K. M., & Yong, S. T. (2004). Confucian heritage culture learners’ and instructors’ expectations and preferences in collaborative learning: Convergence or divergence? [Non-referred paper]. Retrieved February 3, 2006, from http://herdsa2004.curtin.edu.my/ Contributions/NRPapers/A055-jt.pdf

  • Verhoeven, J. C. (2000). Some reflections on cross-cultural interviewing. In C.J. Pole, & B. G. Burgess (Eds.),Cross-cultural case study (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: JAI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., & Renshaw, P. (1996). Chinese students at an Australian university: Adaptability and continuity. In D. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds.),The Chinese Learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 205–220). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2000). Collaborative problem solving in mathematics: the nature and function of task complexity. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.

  • Yamanashi, J (2008). Enhancing teachers’ classroom strategies for inclusive group work: A small-scale exploratory study.Special Education Perspectives, 17(1), 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, L. & Kember, D. (2004). Engager and avoider behaviour in types of activities performed by out-of-class learning groups [Electronic version].Higher Education 48(4), 419–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, D., Clarke, D. & Remedios, L. Chinese students’ perception of out-of-class groupwork in Australia. Aust. Educ. Res. 37, 95–112 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216932

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216932

Keywords

Navigation