Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Observations on students’ responses to learning in a CAS environment

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on the responses of students using DERIVE, a computer algebra system, in an introductory calculus course at undergraduate level. There was strong evidence that the use of this technology was a catalyst for students to use three learning strategies which the literature links to enhanced learning outcomes: regularly using multiple representations, discussing meaning with peers and teachers, and including the computer in the conference process. Students felt that using DERIVE in their classes aided but did not underpin their learning of mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins, N., Creegan, A., & Soan, P. (1995). You can lead students to DERIVE but can you make them think?International Derive journal, 2 (1), 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. (1995).Learning to use tools: A study of mathematical software use for the learning of algebra. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

  • Bennett, G. (1995). Calculus for general education in a computer classroom.International DERIVE Journal, 2(2), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. (1993). Algebra and technology.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 12, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.),Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25–41). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drouhard, J.-P. (1997). Communication in the classroom with a CAS: The double didactic pyramid model. In J. Berry, J. Monaghan, M. Kronfellner, & B. Kutzler (Eds.),The state of computer algebra in mathematics education (Report of the International Symposium on Computer Algebra In Mathematics Education, Hawaii, 1995, pp. 165–170). Bromley, England: Chartwell-Bratt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heid, M. K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in allied calculus using the computer as a tool.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heid, M. K., & Zbiek, R. M. (1995). A technology-intensive approach to algebra.Mathematics Teacher, 88, 650–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillel, J., & Linchevski, L. (1992). Basic functions through the lens of computer algebra systems.Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 11, 119–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschhorn, D. B., & Thompson, D. R. (1996) Technology and reasoning in algebra and geometry.Mathematics Teacher, 89, 138–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M., Marshall, P., Monaghan, J., & Roper, T. (1995). Using a computer algebra system with 14–15 year old students. In L. Burton & B. Jaworski (Eds.),Technology in mathematics education (Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching, Birmingham, 1993, pp. 307–324). Bromley, England: Chartwell-Bratt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jernstedt, G. (1983). Computer enhanced collaborative learning: A new technology for education.Technological Horizons in Education, 10(7), 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshua, S., & Dupin, J.-J. (1993).Introduction à la didactique des sciences et des mathematiques [Introduction to science and mathematics education]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendal, M., & Stacey, K. (1999). Varieties of teacher privileging for teaching calculus with computer algebra systems.International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 6, 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutzler, B. (1994). DERIVE—The future of teaching mathematics.International DERIVE Journal, 1(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinbach, C. (1997). The curriculum in a CAS environment. In J. Berry, J. Monaghan, M. Kronfellner, & B. Kutzler (Eds.),The state of computer algebra in mathematics education (Report of the international symposium on computer algebra in mathematics education, Hawaii, 1995, pp. 165–170). Bromley, England: Chartwell-Bratt.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1992). A comparison of pattern-based equation-solving approaches to algebra. In B. Southwell, B. Perry, & K. Owens (Eds.),Space: The first and final frontier (Proceedings of the 15th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 362–371). Richmond, NSW: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, R. (1993). Asymptotes and other limiting functions.Mathematics Teacher, 86, 411–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, H., Glover, B., & Yearwood, J. (1996). A report on curriculum development involving computer algebra systems in mathematics: 1990–1995. In W. Y. D. Yuen, P. Broadbridge, & J. M. Steiner (Eds.),Proceedings of the 2nd biennial Australian Engineering Mathematics Conference (pp. 581–586). Canberra: Institution of Engineers, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitic, P., & Thomas, P. (1994). Pitfalls and limitations of computer algebra.Computers and Education, 22, 355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmiter, J. (1991). Effects of computer algebra systems on concept and skill acquisition in calculus.Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R. (1998). Computer algebra systems and understanding concepts. In J. Gough & J. Mousley (Eds.),Mathematics: Exploring all angles (Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Association of Victoria, pp. 370–374). Melbourne: MAV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (in press). Reflections on the changing pedagogical use of computer algebra systems: Assistance for doing or learning mathematics?Journal of Computing in Mathematics and Science Teaching.

  • Romberg, T.A. (1993). How one comes to know: Models and theories of the learning of mathematics. In M. Niss (Ed.),Investigations into assessment in mathematics education: An ICMI study (pp. 97–111). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, I. (1995). I can’t, … I know a CAS that can!International DERIVE Journal, 2(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. (1989). Concept images, generic organisers, computers and curriculum change.For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(3), 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., Tyrrell, J., & Bullock, J. (1996). Using computers in the mathematics classroom: The role of the teacher.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1990).Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wain, G. (1993). Some technical problems in the use of DERIVE with school pupils.International DERIVE Journal, 1(1), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Ballarat, P.O. Box 663, 3353, Bailarat, VIC

    Robyn Pierce

  2. Department of Science & Mathematics Education, University of Melbourne, 3052, Parkville, VIC

    Kaye Stacey

Authors
  1. Robyn Pierce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaye Stacey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pierce, R., Stacey, K. Observations on students’ responses to learning in a CAS environment. Math Ed Res J 13, 28–46 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217097

Keywords

Search

Navigation