Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of small group discussion reducing misconceptions

  • Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This pilot study establishes characteristics of dialogue during a group discussion designed to reduce misconceptions related to division. Groups of children were videotaped and transcripts were coded for mathematical and interactive aspects of the discourse. Although there were important differences between the nature and purpose of this task and those that have been used in previous studies of peer learning, once again a highly interactive pattern of discourse was found to be associated with effective learning. Substantial differences were found in the ways in which effective and ineffective groups engaged with the content of the discussion. Teachers who are alerted to the characteristics of effective group discussion may be able to help children make it a better learning tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., Greer, B., Grimison, L., & Mangan, C. (1989). Children’s performance on multiplicative word problems: Elements of a descriptive theory.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 434–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (1986). Diagnostic teaching 2: Developing conflict-discussion lessons.Mathematics Teaching, 116, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, N., & Kroll, D. (1991). An overview of research on cooperative learning related to mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics, 22, 362–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, A., & Stacey, K. (1991, June). Aspects of knowledge development through interaction in small groups.Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on the Theory of Mathematics Education, Paderno, Italy.

  • Gooding, A., & Stacey, K. (1993). How children help each other learn in groups. In M. Stephens, A. Waywood, & D. Clarke (Eds.),Communicating mathematics: Perspectives from classroom practice and current research. (pp. 41–50). Hawthorn, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. M. (1981).Children’s understanding of mathematics 11–16. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (1985). The internal dynamics of cooperative learning groups. In: R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.),Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 103–124). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., & Nelson, D. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindow, J. A., Peterson, P. L., & Wilkinson, L. C. (1985). Antecedents and consequences of verbal disagreements during small-group learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 658–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1985). Small groups as a setting for research on mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.),Teaching and learning problem solving. Multiple research perspectives (pp. 345–359). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D. (1987).Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P.L. & Swing, S.R. (1985). Students’ cognitions as mediators of the effectiveness of small-group learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B., Nesher, P., Leonard, F., Magone, M., Omanson, S., & Peled, I. (1990). Conceptual bases of arithmetic errors: The case of decimal fractions.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 8–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. J., & Raphael, D. (1990). Communication and problem solving achievement in cooperative learning groups.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, S., & Shachar, H. (1988).Language and learning in the cooperative classroom. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. McH., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975).Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1980).Using student team learning (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1989). Student team learning in mathematics. In N. Davidson (Ed.),Cooperative learning in mathematics: A handbook for teachers (pp. 69–102). California: Addison Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingle, J. B., & Good, R. (1990). Effects of cooperative grouping on stoichiometric problem solving in high school chemistry.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 671–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (1990). Evoking cognitive conflict to explore preservice teachers’ thinking about division.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, P. (1985).Cooperative learning: A study on processes and effects of cooperation between primary school children. Westerhaven Groningen, Netherlands: Rijkuniversiteit Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. (1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summary. In: R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb & R. Schmuck (Eds.),Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 147–172). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups.International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gooding, A., Stacey, K. Characteristics of small group discussion reducing misconceptions. Math Ed Res J 5, 60–73 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217255

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217255

Keywords

Navigation