Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent educational research has turned increasing attention to the structural development of young students’ mathematical thinking. Early algebra, multiplicative reasoning, and spatial structuring are three areas central to this research. There is increasing evidence that an awareness of mathematical structure is crucial to mathematical competence among young children. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new construct, Awareness of Mathematical Pattern and Structure (AMPS), which generalises across mathematical concepts, can be reliably measured, and is correlated with general mathematical understanding. We provide supporting evidence drawn from a study of 103 Grade 1 students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. C. (1999). Spatial structuring in geometric reasoning.Teaching Children Mathematics, 6, 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. T., Clements, D. H., Arnoff, J., Battista, K., & Borrow, C. (1998). Students’ spatial structuring of 2D arrays of squares.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 503–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. (1982).Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 412–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, R. L. & Thomas, M. J. (2000). Visualization in Mathematics Learning: Arithmetic problem-solving and student difficulties.Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on theBuilding Blocks project.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 136–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification on one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.),Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 151–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 66–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doig, B. (2005). Developing formal mathematical assessment for 4- to 8- year-olds.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(3), 100–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (1999). Assessing for structural understanding in children’s combinatorial problem solving.Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(4), 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2004). Promoting the development of young children’s mathematical and analogical reasoning. In L. D. English (Ed.),Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D., & Watters, J. J. (2005). Mathematical modelling in third-grade classrooms.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(3), 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics.Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 137–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E., Pitta, D., & Tall, D. O. (2000). Objects, actions, and images: A perspective on early number development.Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S., & Kemp, C. (2005). Defining number sense: A participatory Australian study.Educational Psychology, 25, 555–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunting, R. (2003). Part-whole number knowledge in preschool children.Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. (1996). The development of unitizing: Its role in children’s partitioning strategies.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 170–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R. (2007). Introducing students to data representation and statistics. In K. Milton, H. Reeves, & T. Spencer (Eds.),Mathematics: Essential for learning, essential for life (Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, Vol. 1, pp. 22–41). Adelaide: AAMT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Lesh, R. (2003). Mathematical learning. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.),Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Volume 7 (pp. 357–391). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.),Approaches to algebra (pp. 65–86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan (2002). The role of structure in children’s development of multiplicative reasoning. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. O. Thomas (Eds.),Mathematics Education in the South Pacific (Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Auckland, NZ, Vol. 2, pp. 497–503). Sydney: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J. T., English, L. D., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2008). Reconceptualising early mathematics learning: An evaluation study. In O. Figueras, J. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.),Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 32 and PME-NA XXX (Vol. 1, p. 293). México: Cinvestav-UMSNH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (1997). Young children’s intuitive models of multiplication and division.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J., Mitchelmore, M. C., Marston, J., Highfield, K., & Kemp, C. (2008). Promoting mathematical pattern and structure in the first year of schooling: An intervention study. In O. Figueras, J. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.),Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 32 and PME-NA XXX (Vol. 4, pp. 129–136). México: Cinvestav-UMSNH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J. T., Mitchelmore, M. C., Outhred, L. N., & Russell, S. (1997). Second graders’ representations and conceptual understanding of number. In F. Biddulp & K. Carr (Eds.),People in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Rotorua, NZ, Vol. 1, pp. 361–368). Sydney: MERGA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J., Mitchelmore, M., & Prescott, A. (2005). Case studies of children’s development of structure in early mathematics: A two-year longitudinal study. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.),Proceedings of the 29th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 1–9). Melbourne: Program Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J. T., Prescott, A., Papic, M., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2006). Improving early numeracy through a Pattern and Structure Mathematics Awareness Program (PASMAP). In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.),Identities, cultures and learning spaces (Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Canberra, Vol. 2, pp. 376–383). Adelaide: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J. T., & Vergnaud, G. (2006). Research on children’s early mathematical development: Towards integrated perspectives. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.),Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 261–276). London: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J. T., & Watson J. M., (1998). A developmental multi-modal model for multiplication and division.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J. T., & Wright, R. J. (2000). An assessment framework for early multiplication and division. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.),Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 17–25). Hiroshima: Program Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Department of Education & Training. (2001).Count Me In Too: Professional development package. Sydney: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outhred, L., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2000). Young children’s intuitive understanding of rectangular area measurement.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 144–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papic, M., & Mulligan, J. T. (2007). The growth of early mathematical patterning: An intervention study. In J. Watson, & K. Beswick (Eds.),Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice (Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, Vol. 2, pp. 591–600). Adelaide: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970).Structuralism. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitta-Pantazi, D., Gray, E., & Christou, C. (2004). Elementary school students’ mental representations of fractions. In Høines, M.J & Fuglestad, A. (Eds.),Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 41–48). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovin, H., & Dougherty, B. (2004). Children’s conceptual understanding of counting. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.),Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 209–216). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L. (1994). Children’s multiplying schemes. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.),The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 3–41). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. & Mulligan, J. T. (1995). Dynamic imagery in children’s representations of number.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 7(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N., Mulligan, J. T., & Goldin, G. A. (2002). Children’s representations and cognitive structural development of the counting sequence 1–100.Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Nes, F., (2008, July).Relating spatial structuring ability to the development of Kindergartners’ number sense. Paper presented to the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME11), Monterrey, Mexico.

  • Warren, E. (2005). Young children’s ability to generalise the pattern rule for growing patterns. In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.),Proceedings of the 29th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 305–312). Melbourne: Program Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2003). Introducing equivalence and inequivalence in Year 2.Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 8(10), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. J. (1994). A study of the numerical development of 5-year-olds and 6-yearolds.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J. (2002). Early childhood numeracy: Building an understanding of part-whole relationships.Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(4), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Research in Mathematics & Science Education (CRiMSE), Department of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

    Joanne Mulligan & Michael Mitchelmore

Authors
  1. Joanne Mulligan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Mitchelmore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulligan, J., Mitchelmore, M. Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Math Ed Res J 21, 33–49 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544

Keywords

Search

Navigation