Abstract
Change and social order, along with the related concepts of homogenization vis-a-vis differentiation of organizational types, have long caught the interest of social scientists. Theories of change and organizational differentiation abound. However, there appears to be a need for more research on how change threatens fundamental social classifications and how actors manipulate classifications and social taxonomies to protect their interests and restore order. The recent restructuring of Australian higher education provides an ideal case for exploring the effects of classificatory variation for the process has challenged cherished ideas about the essential characteristics of higher education. The extent to which the challenge has been met and repulsed by those threatened is the subject of this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Advanced Education Council (1982),Future Perspectives for Advanced Education: A Discussion Paper, Canberra.
Australian Conference of Directors and Principals of Colleges of Advanced Education (ACDP) (1982), “Response by Directors and Principals in Advanced Education to the Discussion Paper ‘Future Perspectives in Advanced Education’”.
Australian Universities Commission (1964–65), (Martin Report), Committee on the Future of Tertiary Education in Australia,Report, 3 vols., Canberra, Government Printer.
Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee (AVCC) (1989), “Criteria for University Designation”, Canberra.
Becker, H. (1932), “Processes of Secularisation: An Ideal-Typical Analysis with Special Reference to Personality Change as Affected by Population Movement”,The Sociological Review, 24.
Becker, H. (1970), “The Nature of a Profession”, inSociological Work Method and Substance, New Brunswick (N. J.), Transaction Books.
Borges, J. L. (1981), “Avatars of the Tortoise”, inLabyrinths, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.
Clark, B. R. (1983),The Higher Education System, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Collingwood, R. G. (1940),An Essay on Metaphysics, Oxford University Press.
Davies, S. (1989),The Martin Committee and the Binary Policy of Higher Education in Australia, Melbourne, Ashwood House.
Dawkins, J. (1987), “Government Proposes New Higher Education System”, Media Release, Minister for Employment, Education and Training, 9 December.
Dawkins, J. (1987),Higher Education: a policy discussion paper, Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, December.
Dawkins, J. (1988),Higher Education: a policy statement, Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.
Douglas, M. (1966),Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, London, Roudedge and Kegan Paul.
Durkheim, E. (1982), “Rules for the Construction of Social Types”, in S. Lukes, (ed.),The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociological Method, London, Macmillan.
Durkheim, E. and Mauss, M. (1969),Primitive Classification, 2nd ed., London, Cohen & West.
Freidson, E. (1970),Profession of Medicine. A Study in the Sociology of Applied Knowledge, New York, Harper and Row.
Harman, G. (1989), “The Dawkins Reconstruction of Australian Higher Education”, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 27–31 March, San Francisco.
“La Trobe University: A New Academic Profile”, Paper AB 89/433 considered by the University’s Academic Board on 29 November 1989.
McLaren, J. (1989), “Shaping a New University”,The Age, 19 July.
Media Release by Minister for Employment, Education and Training (1987), “Policy Discussion Paper on Higher Education — A Summary”, 9 December.
Meek, V. L. and Goedegebuure, L.C. (1989),Higher Education: A Report, Armidale, University of New England.
Meek, V. Lynn (1989), “Institutional Amalgamation in Higher Education”,Journal of Education Policy, 4(1).
Mildred, G. (1986),The Binary System, Paper presented at the seminar on the Future of Advanced Education, South Australian College of Advanced Education, September.
National Board of Employment, Education and Training (1989),Report of the Task Force on Amalgamations in Higher Education, Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.
Needham, R. (1975), “Polythetic Classification: Convergence and Consequences”,Man (N.S.), 10, 3.
Nisbet, Robert A. (1969),Social Change and History, Oxford University Press.
O’Neill, A. (1984), “Starting the Company: the College Lobby”,Journal of Tertiary Educational Administration, 6, 2.
Osborne, M. (1988), “Priorities, Equity and Excellence in Research”,Journal of Tertiary Educational Administration, 10,2.
Parkin, F. (1979),Marxism and Class Theory A Bourgeois Critique, London, Tavistock.
Parkin, F. (ed.) (1974),The Social Analysis of Class Structure, London, Tavistock.
Pratt, J. and Burgess, T. (1974),Polytechnics: A Report, London, Pitman.
Roth, J. (1970), “Professionalism: The Sociologist’s Decoy”Sociology of Work and Occupations, 1, 1, pp. 6–23.
Scott, R. (1988), “The New ‘Binarism?’, Staffing Aspects of the Green Paper”, in Harman, G. and Meek, V. L., (eds.),Australian Higher Education Reconstructed, Armidale, University of New England, Department of Administrative and Higher Education Studies.
The Australian, 31 July 1989.
Trow, M. (1984), “The Analysis of Status”, in Clark, Burton R., (ed.),Perspectives on Higher Education, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Wilensky, H. (1964), “The Professionalization of Everyone?”The American Journal of Sociology 70, 2.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958),Philosophical Investigations, 2nd. ed., Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meek, V.L., O’Neill, A. Organizational change in Australian higher education: Process and outcome. Aust. Educ. Res. 17, 1–23 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219475
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219475