Abstract
This paper addresses the current help-oriented focus of researchers in applied behavior analysis. Evidence from a recent volume of JABA suggests that analytic behavior is at low levels in applied analysis while cure-help behavior is at high strength. This low proportion of scientific behavior is apparantly related to cure-help contingencies set by institutions and agencies of help and the editorial policies of JABA itself. These contingencies have favored the flight to real people and a concern with client gains, evaluation and outcome strategies rather than the analysis of contingencies of reinforcement controlling human behavior. In this regard, the paper documents the current separation of applied behavior analysis from the experimental analysis of behavior. There is limited use of basic principles in applied analysis today and almost no reference to the current research in the experimental analysis of behavior involving concurrent operants and adjunctive behavior. This divorce of applied behavior research and the experimental analysis of behavior will mitigate against progress toward a powerful technology of behavior. In order to encourage a return to analysis in applied research, there is a need to consider the objectives of applied behavior analysis. The original purpose of behavioral technology is examined and a re-definition of the concept of “social importance” is presented which can direct applied researchers toward an analytic focus. At the same time a change in the publication policies of applied journals such as JABA toward analytic research and the design of new educational contingencies for students will insure the survival of analysis in applied behavior analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Catania, A. C. On being behavioral in nonbehavioral places. Invited address given to the Division of Experimental Analysis of Behavior at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, August, 1978.
Epling, W. Frank and Zelhart, P. F. An animal analogue of Anorexia Nervosa. A paper presented to the Psychologists Association of Alberta, Jasper, Alberta, Canada, 1978.
Hayes, S. C., Rincover, A. and Solnick, J. V. The Technical Drift of Applied Behavior Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, (in press), 1980.
Johnston, James M. Personal Communication, March 3, 1980.
References
Azrin, N. H. A strategy for applied research: learning based but outcome oriented. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 140–149.
Baum, W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law; bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974, 22, 321–342.
Baum, W. M. The correlation based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973, 20, 137–153.
Baer, D. M., and Sherman, J. A. Reinforcement control of generalized imitation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1964, 1, 37–49.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. and Risley, T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 91–97.
Burgess, R. L., and Bushell, D. Jr. Behavioral sociology: the experimental analysis of social processes. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.
Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.
Catania, A. C. Concurrent operants. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
Deitz, S. M. Current status of applied behavior analysis: science versus technology. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 805–814.
Falk, J. L. The Nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. Physiology and Behavior, 1971, 6, 577–588.
Ferster, C. B., Culbertson, S. and Boren, M. C. P. Behavior principles. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1975.
Foster, W. S. Adjunctive behavior: an under-reported phenomenon in applied behavior analysis? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 545–546.
Gewirtz, J. L., and Boyd, E. F. Experiments on mother-infant interaction underlying mutual attachment acquisition: the infant conditions the mother. In T. Alloway, P. Pliner and L. Kranes (Eds.), Attachment behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.
Green, B. F., Willis, B. S., Levy, R. and Bailey, J. S. Measuring client gains from staff-implemented programs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 395–412.
Guttman, N. and Kalish, H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956, 51, 79–88.
Herrnstein, R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961, 4, 267–272.
Israel, A. C. Some thoughts on correspondence between saying and doing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 271–276.
Skinner, B. F. The flight from the laboratory. In B. F. Skinner (3rd Ed.), Cummulative record. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Skinner, B. F. The design of cultures. Daedalus, 1961, 90, 534–546.
Skinner, B. F. Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press, 1953.
Wolf, M. M. Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 203–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pierce, W.D., Epling, W.F. What Happened to Analysis in Applied Behavior Analysis?. BEHAV ANALYST 3, 1–9 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392373
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392373