Skip to main content
Log in

Control as an educational tool and its impact on the outdoor educational process

  • Refereed Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mainstream education studies have shown that teachers have a strong desire to control their work situation and maintain classroom autonomy. Issues of control and power are also prevalent in outdoor education, where the facilitator is put in a position of power, controlling the participants’ learning experience. What follows is an examination of how order and instructions are used, on occasion, by facilitators in an outdoor setting to take control over the activity and achieve their own disciplinary goals. This paper was based on a PhD study conducted at a residential outdoor centre, involving primary school children, teachers and the centre staff. An ethnographic approach was adopted, using participant observation and semi-structured interviews to collect varied data. The findings revealed that the controlling approaches adopted by some facilitators interfered with the pupils’ outdoor learning experience. This level of control appeared to have a great impact on the educational process to the extent that the desired learning outcomes were not attained. This has serious implications on the impact that teachers’ and outdoor facilitators’ approaches have on the pupils’ outdoor learning experience, and more awareness is needed with regard to this impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beames, S. (2004). Critical elements of an expedition experience. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 4(2), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendaly, L. (2000). The facilitation skills training kit. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, M.A. (2005). Making teaching decisions in the outdoors: Optimising learning and safety. In T.J Dickson, T. Gray and B. Hayllar (Eds), Outdoor and experiential learning: Views from the top (pp. 220-229). Dunedin: Otago University Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2001). What does a close reading of interaction tell us about how we conduct facilitation sessions, The 12th National Outdoor Education Conference: Education Outdoors — our Sense of Place Proceedings, La Trobe University Bendigo, Victoria 15–18, Jan 2001, pp. 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2002). The facilitator as gatekeeper: a critical analysis of social order in facilitation sessions. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2005). Rethinking the role of the facilitator: What a close examination of talk reveals. In T.J Dickson, T. Gray and B. Hayllar (Eds), Outdoor and experiential learning: Views from the top (pp. 240-249). Dunedin: Otago University Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S. (1995). What is the question? In K. Warren, M. Sakofs and J. Hunt, Jr. (Eds), The theory of experiential education (3rd ed., pp. 236–239). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C.G. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (1982). Life in classroom and playground. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S. (1983). Interaction in the classroom: Contemporary sociology of the school (2nd ed.) London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S. (1992). Fieldwork in educational settings: Methods, pitfalls and perspectives. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, T. (2005). Deconstructing ‘the five generations of facilitated learning from adventure experiences.’ In T.J. Dickson, T. Gray and B. Hayllar (Eds), Outdoor and experiential learning: Views from the top (pp. 230–239). Dunedin: Otago University Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D.M. (1989). Ethnography — step by step. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: selective essays. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, W. (1990). Quality school. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, C. (1985). Typical girls? Young women from school to the job market. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. B. (1991). Faultless facilitation: An instructor’s manual for facilitation training. Amherst, MA: Human Resources Development Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. B. (1992). Faultless facilitation: A resource guide for group and team leaders. Amherst, MA: Human Resources Development Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayllar, B. (2005). Leadership and facilitation. In T.J. Dickson, T. Gray and B. Hayllar (Eds), Outdoor and experiential learning — views from the top (pp. 179–183) Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberstone, B. (1997). Challenging dominant ideologies in the research process. In G. Clarke & B. Humberstone (Eds), Researching women and sport (pp.199–213). London: Macmillan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby I. (1996). Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse and Society, 7(4), 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joplin, L. (1995). On defining experiential education. In K. Warren, M. Sakofs and J. Hunt, Jr. (Eds), The theory of experiential education (3rd ed, pp. 15–22). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreisberg, S. (1992). Transforming power: Domination, empowerment and education. New York: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh, R. (1983). Learning through imaging. A guide to learning based on suggestion. Porvoo: Werner Soderstrom Osakeyhtio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, L. (1995). Effective facilitators — a key element in successful continuous improvement processes. Training for Quality 3 (4), 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A. (1985). The social world of the primary school. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, S. & Gass, M.A. (1993). Five generations of facilitated learning from adventure experiences. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 10(3), 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, S. & Gass, M. (1997). Effective leadership in adventure programming. Adelaide: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H.A. (1994). The ethnography of empowerment: The transformative power of classroom interaction. Washington D.C.: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, J. (2007). Taking things into account: Learning as kinaesthetically-mediated collaboration. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 7(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, P. A. (1992). The ‘never-evers’ of workshop facilitation. Journal of Staff Development, 13(2), 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, D. (2000). From pedagogical dialogue to dialogic pedagogy. Language and Education, 14(4), 283–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stan, I. (2009). Recontextualizing the role of the facilitator in group interaction in the outdoor classroom. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 9(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starhawk, (1988). Dreaming the dark: Magic, sex and politics. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley J.P (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, D.A., Doherty K.L., Garvey D.E. & Gass, M.A. (2000). Reflective learning: Theory and practice. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walford, G. (2001). Doing qualitative educational research: A personal guide to the research process. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walford, G. (Ed.) (2002). Doing a doctorate in educational ethnography, Vol. 7. Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yardley A. (1976). The organisation of the infant school. London: Evans.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ina Stan.

Additional information

Ina Stan was awarded her PhD by Brunei University for research undertaken at Buckinghamshire New University in 2008. She worked as a post-doctoral research assistant and a part-time lecturer within the School of Sport, Leisure and Travel at the same university. She has been working on a pilot study entitled the Well-being and Outdoor Pedagogies. She is also undergoing research on Pregnancy Leisure and the Well-being of Women. Her research interests are in ethnographic studies, group interaction, and education, particularly outdoor learning with primary school children.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stan, I. Control as an educational tool and its impact on the outdoor educational process. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 14, 12–20 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400901

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400901

Navigation