Abstract
Mainstream education studies have shown that teachers have a strong desire to control their work situation and maintain classroom autonomy. Issues of control and power are also prevalent in outdoor education, where the facilitator is put in a position of power, controlling the participants’ learning experience. What follows is an examination of how order and instructions are used, on occasion, by facilitators in an outdoor setting to take control over the activity and achieve their own disciplinary goals. This paper was based on a PhD study conducted at a residential outdoor centre, involving primary school children, teachers and the centre staff. An ethnographic approach was adopted, using participant observation and semi-structured interviews to collect varied data. The findings revealed that the controlling approaches adopted by some facilitators interfered with the pupils’ outdoor learning experience. This level of control appeared to have a great impact on the educational process to the extent that the desired learning outcomes were not attained. This has serious implications on the impact that teachers’ and outdoor facilitators’ approaches have on the pupils’ outdoor learning experience, and more awareness is needed with regard to this impact.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beames, S. (2004). Critical elements of an expedition experience. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 4(2), 145–157.
Bendaly, L. (2000). The facilitation skills training kit. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
Boyes, M.A. (2005). Making teaching decisions in the outdoors: Optimising learning and safety. In T.J Dickson, T. Gray and B. Hayllar (Eds), Outdoor and experiential learning: Views from the top (pp. 220-229). Dunedin: Otago University Print.
Brown, M. (2001). What does a close reading of interaction tell us about how we conduct facilitation sessions, The 12th National Outdoor Education Conference: Education Outdoors — our Sense of Place Proceedings, La Trobe University Bendigo, Victoria 15–18, Jan 2001, pp. 109–126.
Brown, M. (2002). The facilitator as gatekeeper: a critical analysis of social order in facilitation sessions. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2(2), 101–112.
Brown, M. (2005). Rethinking the role of the facilitator: What a close examination of talk reveals. In T.J Dickson, T. Gray and B. Hayllar (Eds), Outdoor and experiential learning: Views from the top (pp. 240-249). Dunedin: Otago University Print.
Chapman, S. (1995). What is the question? In K. Warren, M. Sakofs and J. Hunt, Jr. (Eds), The theory of experiential education (3rd ed., pp. 236–239). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Christians, C.G. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davies, B. (1982). Life in classroom and playground. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Delamont, S. (1983). Interaction in the classroom: Contemporary sociology of the school (2nd ed.) London: Methuen.
Delamont, S. (1992). Fieldwork in educational settings: Methods, pitfalls and perspectives. London: The Falmer Press.
Dey I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
Dickson, T. (2005). Deconstructing ‘the five generations of facilitated learning from adventure experiences.’ In T.J. Dickson, T. Gray and B. Hayllar (Eds), Outdoor and experiential learning: Views from the top (pp. 230–239). Dunedin: Otago University Print.
Fetterman, D.M. (1989). Ethnography — step by step. London: Sage.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: selective essays. New York: Basic Books.
Glasser, W. (1990). Quality school. New York: Harper and Row.
Griffin, C. (1985). Typical girls? Young women from school to the job market. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
Hart, L. B. (1991). Faultless facilitation: An instructor’s manual for facilitation training. Amherst, MA: Human Resources Development Press.
Hart, L. B. (1992). Faultless facilitation: A resource guide for group and team leaders. Amherst, MA: Human Resources Development Press.
Hayllar, B. (2005). Leadership and facilitation. In T.J. Dickson, T. Gray and B. Hayllar (Eds), Outdoor and experiential learning — views from the top (pp. 179–183) Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Print.
Humberstone, B. (1997). Challenging dominant ideologies in the research process. In G. Clarke & B. Humberstone (Eds), Researching women and sport (pp.199–213). London: Macmillan Press.
Hutchby I. (1996). Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse and Society, 7(4), 481–497.
Joplin, L. (1995). On defining experiential education. In K. Warren, M. Sakofs and J. Hunt, Jr. (Eds), The theory of experiential education (3rd ed, pp. 15–22). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Kreisberg, S. (1992). Transforming power: Domination, empowerment and education. New York: State University of New York.
Lindh, R. (1983). Learning through imaging. A guide to learning based on suggestion. Porvoo: Werner Soderstrom Osakeyhtio.
Parry, L. (1995). Effective facilitators — a key element in successful continuous improvement processes. Training for Quality 3 (4), 9–14.
Pollard, A. (1985). The social world of the primary school. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Priest, S. & Gass, M.A. (1993). Five generations of facilitated learning from adventure experiences. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 10(3), 23–25.
Priest, S. & Gass, M. (1997). Effective leadership in adventure programming. Adelaide: Human Kinetics.
Robinson, H.A. (1994). The ethnography of empowerment: The transformative power of classroom interaction. Washington D.C.: The Falmer Press.
Seaman, J. (2007). Taking things into account: Learning as kinaesthetically-mediated collaboration. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 7(1), 3–20.
Sharp, P. A. (1992). The ‘never-evers’ of workshop facilitation. Journal of Staff Development, 13(2), 38–40.
Skidmore, D. (2000). From pedagogical dialogue to dialogic pedagogy. Language and Education, 14(4), 283–96.
Stan, I. (2009). Recontextualizing the role of the facilitator in group interaction in the outdoor classroom. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 9(1), 23–43.
Starhawk, (1988). Dreaming the dark: Magic, sex and politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
Spradley J.P (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sugarman, D.A., Doherty K.L., Garvey D.E. & Gass, M.A. (2000). Reflective learning: Theory and practice. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Walford, G. (2001). Doing qualitative educational research: A personal guide to the research process. London: Continuum.
Walford, G. (Ed.) (2002). Doing a doctorate in educational ethnography, Vol. 7. Oxford: Elsevier.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.
Yardley A. (1976). The organisation of the infant school. London: Evans.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Ina Stan was awarded her PhD by Brunei University for research undertaken at Buckinghamshire New University in 2008. She worked as a post-doctoral research assistant and a part-time lecturer within the School of Sport, Leisure and Travel at the same university. She has been working on a pilot study entitled the Well-being and Outdoor Pedagogies. She is also undergoing research on Pregnancy Leisure and the Well-being of Women. Her research interests are in ethnographic studies, group interaction, and education, particularly outdoor learning with primary school children.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stan, I. Control as an educational tool and its impact on the outdoor educational process. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 14, 12–20 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400901
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400901