Skip to main content

A framework for argumentation-based negotiation

  • Section IV: Formal Methods
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Intelligent Agents IV Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1365))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many autonomous agents operate in domains in which the cooperation of their fellow agents cannot be guaranteed. In such domains negotiation is essential to persuade others of the value of co-operation. This paper describes a general framework for negotiation in which agents exchange proposals backed by arguments which summarise the reasons why the proposals should be accepted. The argumentation is persuasive because the exchanges are able to alter the mental state of the agents involved. The framework is inspired by our work in the domain of business process management and is explained using examples from that domain.

On sabbatical leave from IIIA thanks to a Spanish MEC grant PR95-313. Research partially supported by the Spanish CICYT project SMASH, TIC96-1038-C04001.

On leave from Laboratorio Nacional de Informática Avanzada -LANIA. Rébsamen, 80; Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico. Enjoying a Mexican CONACYT grant [69068-7245].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade. Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In Proc 9th Conf on Uncertainty in AI, pages 411–419, Washington, USA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Castelfranchi. Social Power: A Point missed in Multi-Agent, DAI and HCI. In Y Demazeau and J. P. Müller, editors, Decentralised AI, pages 49–62. Elsevier, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321–357, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Gardenfors. Knowledge in Flux. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Giunchiglia and L. Serafini. Multilanguage hierarchical logics (or: How we can do without modal logics). Artificial intelligence, 65:29–70, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. D. Goldfarb. The undecidability of the second-order unification problem. Theoretical Computer Science, 13:225–230, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. R. Gruber. The role of common ontology in achieving sharable, reusable knowledge bases. In J. A. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, editors, Proc. of the Second Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Mateo, CA, 1991. Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M. J. Johnson, T. J. Norman, P. O'Brien, and M. E. Wiegand. Agent-based business process management. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 5(2&3):105–130, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Karlins and H. I. Abelson. Persuasion. Crosby Lockwood & Son, London, UK, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kraus, M. Nirkhe, and K. Sycara. Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model (preliminary report). In DAI Workshop'93, pages 233–247, Pensylvania, USA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kraus, J. Wilkenfeld, and G. Zlotkin. Multiagent negotiation under time constraints. Artificial Intelligence, 75:297–345, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Noriega and C. Sierra. Towards layered dialogical agents. In Proceedings of the ECAI'96 Workshop Agents Theories, Architectures and Languages, ATAL'96, number 1193 in LNAI, pages 157–171. Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Parsons and N. R. Jennings. Negotiation through argumentation—a preliminary report. In Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems, ICMAS'96, pages 267–274, Kyoto, Japan, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgefff. BDI agents: From Theory to Practice. In Proc 1st Int Conf on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 312–319, San Francisco, USA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Sierra, P. Faratin, and N. R. Jennings. A service-oriented negotiation model between autonomous agents. In MAAMAW'97, pages 17–35, Ronneby, Sweden, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. G. Smith and R. Davis. Frameworks for cooperation in distributed problem solving. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11(1):61–70, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. S.Rosenschein and G. Zlotkin. Rules of Encounter. The MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. P. Sycara. Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision, 8:203–242, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D. N. Walton. Informal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Munindar P. Singh Anand Rao Michael J. Wooldridge

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R., Noriega, P., Parsons, S. (1998). A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: Singh, M.P., Rao, A., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds) Intelligent Agents IV Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. ATAL 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1365. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026758

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026758

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64162-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69696-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics