Skip to main content

Adaptive automotive speed control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Workshop on Advances in Control and its Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 208))

Abstract

Modern automotive speed control systems are designed to provide smooth throttle movement, zero steady state speed error, good speed tracking over varying road slopes, and robustness to system variations and operating conditions. Additionally, there is a need to minimize the number of controller calibrations for different vehicle applications. All of the above objectives cannot be simultaneously met by conventional fixed gain controllers which need different calibrations for different vehicle lines. With such requirements, an adaptive controller offers benefits over a conventional controller provided its complexity does not significantly exceed that of a conventional controller.

To limit the controller complexity, the adaptive design in this study is based on sensitivity analysis and slow adaptation using gradient methods. This design method allows the use of our a priori knowledge about the plant model in order to determine a stability region for a reduced order adaptive controller, in this case a simple PI controller. The adaptive algorithm, driven by the vehicle response to road load torque disturbances, tunes a PI controller to continuously minimize a single performance based cost functional for each different vehicle over varying road terrain. This results in performance not possible with a fixed gain controller. The adaptive controller has been tested on a number of vehicles with excellent results, some of which are presented here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. T. Ball, “Approaches and Trends in Automatic Speed Controls,” SAE Tech. Paper #670195, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. C. Follmer, “Electronic Speed Control,” SAE Tech. Paper #740022, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. J. Sobolak, “Simulation of the Ford Vehicle Speed Control System,” SAE Tech. Paper #820777, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Nakamura, T. Ochiai, and K. Tanigawa, “Application of Microprocessor to Cruise Control System,” Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automotive Application of Microprocessors, pp. 37–44, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Chaudhure, R. J. Schwabel, and L. H. Voelkle, “Speed Control Integrated into the Powertrain Computer,” SAE Tech. Paper #860480, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Tabe, H,. Takeuchi, M. Tsujii, and M. Ohba, “Vehicle Speed Control System Using Modern Control Theory,” Proceedings of the 1986 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Intrumentation, (IECON'86), vol 1, pp. 365–370, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Uriuhara, T. Hattori, and S. Morida, “Development of Automatic Cruising Using Fuzzy Control System,” Journal of SAE of Japan, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 224–229, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Abate and N. Dosio, “Use of Fuzzy Logic for Engine Idle Speed Control,” SAE Tech. Paper #900594, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Tsujii, H. Takeuchi, K. Oda, and M. Ohba, “Application of Self-Tuning to Automotive Cruise Control,” Proc. Amer. Contr. Conf., pp. 1843–1848, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Hong, and N. Collings, “Application of Self-Tuning Control,” SAE Tech. Paper #900593, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. V. Kokotovic, “Method of Sensitivity Points in the Investigation and Optimization of Linear Control Systems,” Automation and Remote Control, vol 25, pp. 1670–1676, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. S. Rhode, “Sensitivity Methods and Slow Adaptation,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. S. Rhode and P. V. Kokotovic, “Parameter Convergence Conditions Independent of Plant Order,” in Proc. Amer. Contr. Conf., pp. 981–986, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. D. Riedle, and P. V. Kokotovic, “Integral Manifolds of Slow Adaptation,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 31, pp. 316–323, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. V. Kokotovic, B. D. Riedle, and L. Praly, “On A Stability Criterion for Continuous Slow Adaptation,” Sys. Contr. Lett., vol. 6, pp. 7–14, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B. D. O. Anderson, R. R. Bitmead, C. R. Johnson, Jr., P. V. Kokotovic, R. L. Kosut, I. Mareels, L. Praly, and B. D. Riedle, Stability of Adaptive Systems: Passivity and Averaging Analysis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Boyd and S. S. Sastry, “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Parameter Convergence in Adaptive Control,” Automatica, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 629–639, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hassan K. Khalil (Professor)Joe H. Chow (Professor)Petros A. Ioannou (Professor)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liubakka, M.K., Rhode, D.S., Winkelman, J.R. (1996). Adaptive automotive speed control. In: Khalil, H.K., Chow, J.H., Ioannou, P.A. (eds) Proceedings of Workshop on Advances in Control and its Applications. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 208. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027700

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027700

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19993-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39384-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics