Skip to main content
Log in

Supersymmetry on curved spaces and holography

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study superconformal and supersymmetric theories on Euclidean four- and three-manifolds with a view toward holographic applications. Preserved supersymmetry for asymptotically locally AdS solutions implies the existence of a (charged) “conformal Killing spinor” on the boundary. We study the geometry behind the existence of such spinors. We show in particular that, in dimension four, they exist on any complex manifold. This implies that a superconformal theory has at least one supercharge on any such space, if we allow for a background field (in general complex) for the R-symmetry. We also show that this is actually true for any supersymmetric theory with an R-symmetry. We also analyze the three-dimensional case and provide examples of supersymmetric theories on Sasaki spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Pestun, Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun. Math. Phys. 313 (2012) 71 [arXiv:0712.2824] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Kapustin, B. Willett and I. Yaakov, Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 089 [arXiv:0909.4559] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. D.L. Jafferis, The exact superconformal R-symmetry extremizes Z, JHEP 05 (2012) 159 [arXiv:1012.3210] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Hama, K. Hosomichi and S. Lee, Notes on SUSY gauge theories on three-sphere, JHEP 03 (2011) 127 [arXiv:1012.3512] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Nawata, Localization of N = 4 superconformal field theory on S1 × S3 and index, JHEP 11 (2011) 144 [arXiv:1104.4470] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Hama, K. Hosomichi and S. Lee, SUSY gauge theories on squashed three-spheres, JHEP 05 (2011) 014 [arXiv:1102.4716] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Imamura and D. Yokoyama, N = 2 supersymmetric theories on squashed three-sphere, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 025015 [arXiv:1109.4734] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Festuccia and N. Seiberg, Rigid supersymmetric theories in curved superspace, JHEP 06 (2011) 114 [arXiv:1105.0689] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Martelli, A. Passias and J. Sparks, The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a squashed three-sphere, arXiv:1110.6400 [INSPIRE].

  10. D. Martelli and J. Sparks, The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a biaxially squashed three-sphere, arXiv:1111.6930 [INSPIRE].

  11. J.P. Gauntlett, J.B. Gutowski and N.V. Suryanarayana, A deformation of AdS5 × S5, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 5021 [hep-th/0406188] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Behrndt and D. Klemm, Black holes in Godel type universes with a cosmological constant, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 4107 [hep-th/0401239] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Balasubramanian, E.G. Gimon, D. Minic and J. Rahmfeld, Four-dimensional conformal supergravity from AdS space, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 104009 [hep-th/0007211] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Kaku, P. Townsend and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Superconformal unified field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 1109 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Kaku, P. Townsend and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Gauge theory of the conformal and superconformal group, Phys. Lett. B 69 (1977) 304 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Kaku, P. Townsend and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Properties of conformal supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 3179 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Ferrara and B. Zumino, Structure of conformal supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 134 (1978) 301 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Sezgin and Y. Tanii, Superconformal σ-models in higher than two-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 443 (1995) 70 [hep-th/9412163] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Bergshoeff, S. Cecotti, H. Samtleben and E. Sezgin, Superconformal σ-models in three dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 838 (2010) 266 [arXiv:1002.4411] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Barth, C. Peters and A. Van de Ven, A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics. Vol. 2: Compact complex surfaces, Springer, Heidelberg Germany (2004).

  21. M. Kaku and P. Townsend, Poincaré supergravity as broken superconformal gravity, Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 54 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Van Proeyen, Superconformal tensor calculus in \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 and \( \mathcal{N} \) = 2 supergravity, Proceedings of Karpacz Winter School, Karpacz Poland, 14-26 February 1983.

  23. M.F. Sohnius and P.C. West, An alternative minimal off-shell version of N = 1 supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 105 (1981) 353 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Samtleben and D. Tsimpis, Rigid supersymmetric theories in 4d Riemannian space, JHEP 05 (2012) 132 [arXiv:1203.3420] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. B. Jia and E. Sharpe, Rigidly supersymmetric gauge theories on curved superspace, JHEP 04 (2012) 139 [arXiv:1109.5421] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. T.T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia and N. Seiberg, Exploring Curved Superspace, arXiv:1205.1115 [INSPIRE].

  27. M.C. Cheng and K. Skenderis, Positivity of energy for asymptotically locally AdS spacetimes, JHEP 08 (2005) 107 [hep-th/0506123] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Das, M. Kaku and P. Townsend, A unified approach to matter coupling in Weyl and Einstein supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 1215 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Lichnerowicz, Killing spinors, twistor-spinors and Hijazi inequality, J. Geom. Phys. 5 (1988) 1.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Baum, Conformal Killing spinors and special geometric structures in Lorentzian geometry: a survey, math/0202008 [INSPIRE].

  31. J. Lee and T. Parker, The Yamabe problem, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 1987) 37.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Schoen, Conformal deformation of a Riemannian metric to constant scalar curvature, J. Diff. Geom. 20 (1984) 479.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. O. Hijazi, A conformal lower bound for the smallest eigenvalue of the Dirac operator and Killing spinors, Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 151 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. H. Lü, C. Pope and J. Rahmfeld, A construction of Killing spinors on Sn, J. Math. Phys. 40 (1999) 4518 [hep-th/9805151] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. H. Baum, Complete Riemannian manifolds with imaginary Killing spinors, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 7 (1989) 205.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. C. Bär, Real Killing spinors and holonomy, Commun. Math. Phys. 154 (1993) 509.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Lichnerowicz, On the twistor-spinors, Lett. Math. Phys. 18 (1989) 333.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Moroianu, Parallel and Killing spinors on spin c manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 187 (1997) 417 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Graña, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Tomasiello, Supersymmetric backgrounds from generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds, JHEP 08 (2004) 046 [hep-th/0406137] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. D. Lüst, P. Patalong and D. Tsimpis, Generalized geometry, calibrations and supersymmetry in diverse dimensions, JHEP 01 (2011) 063 [arXiv:1010.5789] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. H. Lawson and M. Michelsohn, Princeton Mathematical Series. Vol. 38: Spin geometry, Princeton University Press, Princeton U.S.A. (1989).

  42. S. Chiossi and S. Salamon, The Intrinsic torsion of SU(3) and G2 structures, J. Diff. Geom. (2002) [math/0202282] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  43. M. Sohnius and P.C. West, The tensor calculus and matter coupling of the alternative minimal auxiliary field formulation of N = 1 supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 198 (1982) 493 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. S.M. Kuzenko, U. Lindström and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Off-shell supergravity-matter couplings in three dimensions, JHEP 03 (2011) 120 [arXiv:1101.4013] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. S.M. Kuzenko and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Three-dimensional N = 2 (AdS) supergravity and associated supercurrents, JHEP 12 (2011) 052 [arXiv:1109.0496] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 167 [arXiv:0906.3219] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. M. Herzlich and A. Moroianu, Generalized killing spinors and conformal eigenvalue estimates for spin c manifolds, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 17 (1999) 341.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Tomasiello.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1205.1062

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klare, C., Tomasiello, A. & Zaffaroni, A. Supersymmetry on curved spaces and holography. J. High Energ. Phys. 2012, 61 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2012)061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2012)061

Keywords

Navigation