Skip to main content
Log in

The Thomsen–Bachmann correspondence in metric geometry II

  • Published:
Journal of Geometry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We continue the investigations of the Thomsen–Bachmann correspondence between metric geometries and groups, which is often summarized by the phrase ‘Geometry can be formulated in the group of motions’. In the first part (H. Struve and R. Struve in J Geom, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00022-018-0465-8) of this paper it was shown that the Thomsen–Bachmann correspondence can be precisely stated in a framework of first-order logic. We now prove that the correspondence, which was established by Thomsen and Bachmann for Euclidean and for plane absolute geometry, holds also for Hjelmslev geometries, Cayley–Klein geometries, isotropic and equiform geometries, and that these geometries and the theory of their group of motions are mutually faithfully interpretable (and bi-interpretable, but not definitionally equivalent). Hence a reflection-geometric axiomatization of a class of motion groups corresponds to an elementary axiomatization of the underlying geometry and provides with the calculus of reflections a powerful proof method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bachmann, F.: Zur Begründung der Geometrie aus dem Spiegelungsbegriff. Math. Ann. 123, 341–344 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachmann, F.: Axiomatischer Aufbau der ebenen absoluten Geometrie. In: Henkin, L., Suppes, P., Tarski, A. (eds.) The Axiomatic Method, pp. 114–126. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1959)

  3. Bachmann, F.: Hjelmslev planes. Atti del Convegno di Geometria Combinatoria e sue Applcazioni, Perugia, 43–56 (1970)

  4. Bachmann, F.: Aufbau der Geometrie aus dem Spiegelungsbegriff, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1973)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachmann, F., Knüppel, F.: Starrheit in der Geometrie involutorischer Gruppenelemente. Arch. Math. 35, 155–163 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bachmann, F.: Ebene Spiegelungsgeometrie. BI-Verlag, Mannheim (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Behnke, H., Bachmann, F., et al.: Fundamentals of Mathematics, vol. II, Geometry. MIT Press, London (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Bouvère, K.L.: Logical synonymity. Indag. Math. 27, 622–629 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Button, T., Hodge, W., Walsh, S.: Philosophy and Model Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Cayley, A.: A sixth memoir upon quantics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 149, 61–90 (1859). (cp. Collected Math. Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge (1889))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giering, O.: Vorlesungen über höhere Geometrie. Vieweg, Braunschweig (1982)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartshorne, R.: Geometry: Euclid and Beyond. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilbert, D.: Grundlagen der Geometrie. Leipzig, Teubner (1899). Translated by Unger, L., under the title: Foundations of Geometry. Open Court, La Salle, IL (1971)

  14. Hjelmslev, J.: Die natürliche geometrie. Hamb. Math. Einzelschriften. vol. 1 (1923)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hjelmslev, J.: Einleitung in die allgemeine Kongruenzlehre. Danske Vid. Selsk. mat-fys. Medd. 8, Nr. 11 (1929); 10, Nr. 1 (1929); 19, Nr. 12 (1942); 22, Nr. 6, Nr. 13 (1945); 25, Nr.10 (1949)

  16. Karzel, H., Kroll, H.-J.: Geschichte der Geometrie seit Hilbert. Wissenschaft-liche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Karzel, H.: Gruppentheoretische Begründung der absoluten Geometrie mit abgeschwächtem Dreispiegelungssatz. Habilitation, Hamburg (1956)

  18. Klein, F.: Vorlesungen über nicht-euklidische Geometrie. Springer, Berlin (1928)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Klingenberg, W.: Euklidische Ebenen mit Nachbarelementen. Math. Z. 61, 1–25 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Lingenberg, R.: Metric Planes and Metric Vector Spaces. Wiley, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Müller, H.: Zur Begründung der ebenen absoluten Geometrie aus Bewegungs-axiomen. Dissertation, TU München, München (1966)

  22. Pambuccian, V.: Fragments of Euclidean and hyperbolic geometry. Sci. Math. Jpn. 53, 361–400 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Pambuccian, V.: Constructive axiomatization of non-elliptic metric planes. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math. 51, 49–57 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Pambuccian, V.: Groups and plane geometry. Studia Log. 81, 387–398 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Pambuccian, V.: Axiomatizations of hyperbolic and absolute geometries. In: Prékopa, A., Molnár, E. (eds.) Non-Euclidean Geometries: Janos Bolyai Memorial Volume, pp. 119–153. Springer, New York (2006)

  26. Pambuccian, V.: Orthogonality as single primitive notion for metric planes. With an appendix by H. and R. Struve. Beitr. Algebra Geom. 48, 399–409 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Prusińska, A., Szczerba, L.: Geometry as an extension of the group theory. Log. Log. Philos. 10, 131–135 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt, A.: Die Dualität von Inzidenz und Senkrechtstehen in der absoluten Geometrie. Math. Ann. 118, 609–625 (1943)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Schütte, K.: Gruppentheoretisches Axiomensystem einer verallgemeinerten euklidischen Geometrie. Math. Ann. 132, 43–62 (1956)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Snapper, E., Troyer, R.J.: Metric Affine Geometry. Dover Publications, New York (1971)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Sörensen, K.: Ebenen mit Kongruenz. J. Geom. 22, 15–30 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Sperner, E.: Ein gruppentheoretischer Beweis des Satzes von Desargues in der absoluten Axiomatik. Arch. Math. 5, 458–468 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Struve, H.: Singulär projektiv-metrische und Hjelmslevsche Geometrie. Diss. Univ. Kiel (1979)

  34. Struve, H., Struve, R.: Non-euclidean geometries: the Cayley–Klein approach. J. Geom. 98, 151–170 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Struve, R.: An axiomatic foundation of Cayley–Klein geometries. J. Geom. 107, 225–248 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Struve, R., Struve, H.: The Thomsen–Bachmann correspondence in metric geometry I. J. Geom. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00022-018-0465-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Tarski, A.: Einige methodologische Untersuchungen über die Definierbarkeit der Begriffe. Erkenntnis 5, 80–100 (1935)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thomsen, G.: Grundlagen der Elementargeometrie in gruppenalgebraischer Behandlung. Hamburger Math. Einzeilschr. 15, Teubner, Leipzig (1933)

  39. Yaglom, I.M.: A Simple Non-Euclidean Geometry and Its Physical Basis. Springer, Heidelberg (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Struve.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Struve, R., Struve, H. The Thomsen–Bachmann correspondence in metric geometry II. J. Geom. 110, 14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00022-019-0467-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00022-019-0467-1

Mathematics Subject Classification

Keywords

Navigation