Skip to main content
Log in

Homology of Littlewood complexes

  • Published:
Selecta Mathematica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let \(V\) be a symplectic vector space of dimension \(2n\). Given a partition \(\lambda \) with at most \(n\) parts, there is an associated irreducible representation \(\mathbf{{S}}_{[\lambda ]}(V)\) of \(\mathbf{{Sp}}(V)\). This representation admits a resolution by a natural complex \(L^{\lambda }_{\bullet }\), which we call the Littlewood complex, whose terms are restrictions of representations of \(\mathbf{{GL}}(V)\). When \(\lambda \) has more than \(n\) parts, the representation \(\mathbf{{S}}_{[\lambda ]}(V)\) is not defined, but the Littlewood complex \(L^{\lambda }_{\bullet }\) still makes sense. The purpose of this paper is to compute its homology. We find that either \(L^{\lambda }_{\bullet }\) is acyclic or it has a unique nonzero homology group, which forms an irreducible representation of \(\mathbf{{Sp}}(V)\). The nonzero homology group, if it exists, can be computed by a rule reminiscent of that occurring in the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem. This result can be interpreted as the computation of the “derived specialization” of irreducible representations of \(\mathbf{{Sp}}(\infty )\) and as such categorifies earlier results of Koike–Terada on universal character rings. We prove analogous results for orthogonal and general linear groups. Along the way, we will see two topics from commutative algebra: the minimal free resolutions of determinantal ideals and Koszul homology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Technically, we should use the “pro” version of the category, which is opposite to the more usual “ind” version of the category. See [17] for details.

References

  1. Avramov, L., Herzog, J.: The Koszul algebra of a codimension 2 embedding. Math. Z. 175(3), 249–260 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brylinski, R.K.: Matrix concomitants with the mixed tensor model. Adv. Math. 100(1), 28–52 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dan-Cohen, E., Penkov, I., Serganova, V.: A Koszul category of representations of finitary Lie algebras. arXiv:1105.3407v2

  4. Enright, T.J., Willenbring, J.F.: Hilbert series, Howe duality and branching for classical groups. Ann. Math. (2) 159(1), 337–375 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fulton, W., Harris, J.: Representation Theory: A First Course, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 129. Springer, New York (1991)

  6. Howe, R.: Perspectives on invariant theory: Schur duality, multiplicity-free actions and beyond. In: Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings, vol. 8 (1995)

  7. Howe, R., Tan, E.C., Willenbring, J.F.: Stable branching rules for classical symmetric pairs. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 357(4), 1601–1626 (2005). arXiv:math/0311159v2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Humphreys, J.E.: Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

  9. Józefiak, T., Pragacz, P., Weyman, J.: Resolutions of determinantal varieties and tensor complexes associated with symmetric and antisymmetric matrices, Young tableaux and Schur functors in algebra and geometry (Toruń, 1980), pp. 109–189, Astérisque, vol. 87–88, Soc. Math. France, Paris (1981)

  10. King, R.C.: Modification rules and products of irreducible representations of the unitary, orthogonal, and symplectic groups. J. Math. Phys. 12, 1588–1598 (1971)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Koike, K.: On the decomposition of tensor products of the representations of the classical groups: by means of the universal characters. Adv. Math. 74(1), 57–86 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Koike, K., Terada, I.: Young-diagrammatic methods for the representation theory of the classical groups of type \(B_n, C_n\), \(D_n\). J. Algebra 107(2), 466–511 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lascoux, A.: Syzygies des variétés déterminantales. Adv. Math. 30(3), 202–237 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Littlewood, D.E.: The Theory of Group Characters and Matrix Representations of Groups, Reprint of the 2nd edn (1950). AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI (2006)

  15. Macdonald, I.G.: Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials, 2nd edn. Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sam, S.V., Snowden, A.: GL-equivariant modules over polynomial rings in infinitely many variables. arXiv:1206.2233v1

  17. Sam, S.V., Snowden, A.: Stability patterns in representation theory (in preparation)

  18. Sam, S.V., Weyman, J.: Koszul homology of codimension 3 Gorenstein ideals. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. (to appear). arXiv:1203.3168v1

  19. Sundaram, S.: Tableaux in the representation theory of the classical Lie groups, Invariant theory and tableaux (Minneapolis, MN, 1988), pp. 191–225, IMA Vol. Math. Appl. vol. 19. Springer, New York (1990)

  20. Wenzl, H.: Quotients of representation rings, Represent. Theory 15 (2011), 385–406, arXiv: 1101.5887v1

  21. Weyman, J.: Cohomology of Vector Bundles and Syzygies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven V Sam.

Additional information

S. Sam was supported by an NDSEG fellowship and a Miller research fellowship.

A. Snowden was partially supported by NSF fellowship DMS-0902661.

J. Weyman was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-0901185.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sam, S.V., Snowden, A. & Weyman, J. Homology of Littlewood complexes. Sel. Math. New Ser. 19, 655–698 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-013-0119-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-013-0119-5

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation