Skip to main content
Log in

Operative Techniken bei Mitralklappenerkrankungen

Rekonstruktion und/oder Ersatz

Surgical techniques in mitral valve diseases

Reconstruction and/or replacement

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Herz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Mitralklappenerkrankungen zählen zu den häufigsten Herzklappenerkrankungen. Für die primäre Mitralinsuffizienz (MI) ist die chirurgische Mitralklappenrekonstruktion (MKR) die Therapie der Wahl, welche mit einem exzellenten Outcome und Langzeitüberleben in ausgewiesenen Zentren durchgeführt werden kann. Die operative Technik der MKR ist abhängig vom Pathomechanismus, von den morphologischen Dimensionen der Mitralklappe, vom operativen Risiko des Patienten sowie von der Expertise des Herzchirurgen. Die chirurgische und interventionelle Behandlung der sekundären MI ist Gegenstand anhaltender Diskussion. Hierbei sollte die moderate sekundäre MI durch eine chirurgische MKR bei gleichzeitiger Bypass-Versorgung versorgt werden. Bei schwerer sekundärer MI sollte, bei Vorhandensein von Risikofaktoren für ein mögliches Misslingen einer MKR, von vornherein ein Mitralklappenersatz (MKE) durchgeführt werden. Die selten gewordene Mitralklappenstenose sollte unter Berücksichtigung der Pathophysiologie, der Nebenerkrankungen, der notwendigen Antikoagulation sowie des Lebensalters mit einem biologischen oder mechanischen MKE behandelt werden. Des Weiteren bieten neue katheterbasierte Techniken des MKE weitere Behandlungsoptionen zur Reoperation von Hochrisikopatienten.

Abstract

Mitral valve (MV) disease is one of the most common heart valve diseases. The surgical and interventional treatment for MV disease requires a multidisciplinary approach. For primary mitral valve regurgitation (MVR) surgical MV repair is the treatment of choice, which can be performed with an excellent outcome and long-term survival in reference centers. The surgical technique used for MV repair depends on the pathological mechanism, the morphological dimensions of the MV, the operative risk and the expertise of the cardiac surgeon. The surgical and interventional treatment of secondary MVVR is the subject of on-going discussions. In patients with moderate secondary MVR undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, concomitant MV repair should be performed. In the presence of severe secondary MR with risk factors for failure of MV repair, patients should consider having MV replacement. In the rare cases of patients presenting with mitral valve stenosis (MVS) MV repair can be considered in young patients and who are most often treated with MV replacement. The choice between biological or mechanical MV replacement depends on the pathophysiology, the comorbidities, the amount of anticoagulation necessary and the age of the patient. New percutaneous techniques for MV replacement offer new treatment options for reoperation in high-risk patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS et al (2006) Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 368(9540):1005–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iung B, Vahanian A (2011) Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult. Nat Rev Cardiol 8(3):162–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meinertz T, Diegeler A, Stiller B, Fleck E et al (2015) German Heart Report 2013. Clin Res Cardiol 104(2):112–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaemperli O, Corti R (2012) MitraClip for the treatment of mitral regurgitation. Cardiovascular Med 15(10):276–286

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avierinos JF, Gersh BJ, Melton LJ III, Bailey KR et al (2002) Natural history of asymptomatic mitral valve prolapse in the community. Circulation 106(11):1355–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bursi F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Nkomo VT, Jacobsen SJ et al (2005) Heart failure and death after myocardial infarction in the community: the emerging role of mitral regurgitation. Circulation 111(3):295–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Enriquez-Sarano M, Avierinos JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, Detaint D et al (2005) Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 352(9):875–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ et al (2012) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42(4):S1–S44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Castillo JG, Solís J, González-Pinto Á, Adams DH (2011) Surgical echocardiography of the mitral valve. Rev Esp Cardiol 64(12):1169–1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, Borger MA et al (2013) Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center. Circulation 128(5):483–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beckmann A, Funkat AK, Lewandowski J, Frie M et al (2015) Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2014: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 63(4):258–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F et al (2003) A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 24(13):1231–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG et al (2015) 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: the Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 36:3075–3123. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319

  14. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database (2011) http://www.sts.org/national-database

  15. Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, Popescu BA et al (2013) Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14(7):611–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carpentier A, Adams DH, Filsoufi F (2010) Carpentier’s reconstructive valve surgery. From valve analysis to valve reconstruction. Saunders Elsevier, Maryland Heights. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.013

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vahanian A, Lung B, Pierard L, Dion R et al (2009) Valvular heart disease. In: Camm AJ, Luescher TF (eds) The ESC textbook of cardiovascular medicine, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Malden, pp 625–670

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Bonis M, Al-Attar N, Antunes M, Borger M et al (2015) Surgical and interventional management of mitral valve regurgitation: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups on Cardiovascular Surgery and Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv322. (First published online: 7 July 2015)

  19. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, Adams DH et al (2012) EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13(1):1–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noack T, Mukherjee C, Kiefer P, Emrich F et al (2015) Four-dimensional modelling of the mitral valve by real-time 3D transoesophageal echocardiography: proof of concept. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 20(2):200–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ionasec RI, Voigt I, Georgescu B, Wang Y et al (2010) Patient-specific modeling and quantification of the aortic and mitral valves from 4-D cardiac CT and TEE. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(9):1636–1651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jassar AS, Brinster CJ, Vergnat M, Robb JD et al (2011) Quantitative mitral valve modeling using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: technique and repeatability. Ann Thorac Surg 91(1):165–171

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Noack T, Kiefer P, Ionasec R, Voigt I et al (2013) New concepts for mitral valve imaging. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2(6):787–795

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sündermann SH, Falk V (2014) Zur Leitlinie Herzklappenerkrankungen der ESC und EACTS Version 2012. Z Herz Thorax Gefäßchir 28(2):120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Seeburger J, Noack T, Winkfein M, Ender J et al (2010) Loop technique. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2010(809):mmcts 2010.004523

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seeburger J, Borger MA, Falk V, Kuntze T et al (2008) Minimal invasive mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation: results of 1339 consecutive patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34(4):760–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Seeburger J, Falk V, Borger MA, Passage J et al (2009) Chordae replacement versus resection for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse: à ègalité. Ann Thorac Surg 87(6):1715–1720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenhek R, Rader F, Klaar U, Gabriel H et al (2006) Outcome of watchful waiting in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 113(18):2238–2244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vassileva CM, Mishkel G, McNeely C, Boley T et al (2013) Long-term survival of patients undergoing mitral valve repair and replacement: a longitudinal analysis of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Circulation 127(18):1870–1876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Castillo JG, Anyanwu AC, Fuster V, Adams DH (2012) A near 100 % repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: implications for future guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144(2):308–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Nowicki ER, Slisatkorn W et al (2008) Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135(4):885–893, 893.e881–e882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Perier P, Hohenberger W, Lakew F, Batz G et al (2013) Rate of repair in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2(6):751–757

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vassileva CM, McNeely C, Spertus J, Markwell S et al (2015) Hospital volume, mitral repair rates, and mortality in mitral valve surgery in the elderly: an analysis of US hospitals treating Medicare fee-for-service patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 149(3)762–768.e761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vassileva CM, Boley T, Markwell S, Hazelrigg S (2012) Impact of hospital annual mitral procedural volume on mitral valve repair rates and mortality. J Heart Valve Dis 21(1):41–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. David TE, Armstrong S, McCrindle BW, Manlhiot C (2013) Late outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to degenerative disease. Circulation 127(14):1485–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. DiBardino DJ, ElBardissi AW, McClure RS, Razo-Vasquez OA et al (2010) Four decades of experience with mitral valve repair: analysis of differential indications, technical evolution, and long-term outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(1):76–83 (discussion 83–84)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Acker MA, Parides MK, Perrault LP, Moskowitz AJ et al (2014) Mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 370(1):23–32

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Borger MA, Alam A, Murphy PM, Doenst T et al (2006) Chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: repair, replace or rethink? Ann Thorac Surg 81(3):1153–1161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Casselman F, Martens S, De Bruyne B, Degrieck I (2011) Reducing operative mortality in valvular reoperations: the „valve in ring“ procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141(5):1317–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Descoutures F, Himbert D, Maisano F, Casselman F et al (2013) Transcatheter valve-in-ring implantation after failure of surgical mitral repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44(1):e8–e15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilbring M, Alexiou K, Tugtekin SM, Arzt S et al (2014) Pushing the limits – further evolutions of transcatheter valve procedures in the mitral position, including valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, and valve-in-native-ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147(1):210–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Alsidawi S, Eleid MF, Rihal CS, Nkomo VT et al (2015) Significant LVOT obstruction after mitral valve in ring procedure. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev235. (First published online: 29 September 2015)

  43. Bapat V, Pirone F, Kapetanakis S, Rajani R et al (2015) Factors influencing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction following a mitral valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring procedure, part 1. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 86(4):747–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Allende R, Doyle D, Urena M, Ribeiro HB et al (2015) Transcatheter mitral „valve-in-ring“ implantation: a word of caution. Ann Thorac Surg 99(4):1439–1442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Noack.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

T. Noack und F.-W. Mohr geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noack, T., Mohr, FW. Operative Techniken bei Mitralklappenerkrankungen. Herz 41, 10–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-015-4385-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-015-4385-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation