Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: to remove or remain? A retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

A 5-year retrospective study evaluated the incidence and causes for removal of titanium miniplates.

Material and Methods

The surgical records of 156 patients treated with rigid internal fixation after maxillofacial traumas were reviewed. Study variables included age, sex, site of fracture, site and number of plates, time of plate removal and reasons for plate removal.

Results

Of 384 plates used for fixation, 35 plates (9 %) in 21 patients (13.5 %) were removed due to hardware related complications. Statistical significance (p < 0.01) was observed in mandibular body and parasymphysis fractures with regards to both fracture site location and plate removal rates. Most plates were removed within the first year after placement (p < 0.01). The highest number of fractures were observed in the 20–30 years group (p < 0.01) while most cases of removal were in the 30–40 years group (p < 0.01). Secondary reconstruction/growth facilitation (11/156, 7 %) (p < 0.01) was the main cause of plate removal while infection/wound dehiscence (9/156, 6 %) (p < 0.01) was the main cause for complication related plate removal. A significantly greater number of plates placed via intraoral incisions (p < 0.01) needed removal.

Conclusions

The low incidence of complication related plate removal (7 %) in the mid and upper face in this study suggests that routine removal of asymptomatic titanium miniplates after maxillofacial trauma at these sites may not be beneficial. The high rate of mandibular site complications (19 %) in this study suggests that routine removal of titanium hardware from mandibular sites may be indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acero J, Calderon J, Salmeron JI, Verdaguer JJ, Concejo C, Somacarrera ML. The behaviour of titanium as a biomaterial: microscopy study of plates and surrounding tissues in facial osteosynthesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:117–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alpert B, Seligson D. Removal of asymptomatic bone plates used for orthognathic surgery and facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54(5):618–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakathir AA, Margasahayam MV, Al-Ismaily MI. Removal of bone plates in patients with maxillofacial trauma: a retrospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(5):e32–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatt V, Langford RJ. Removal of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery: University Hospital Birmingham experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:553–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown JS, Trotter M, Cliffe J, Ward-Booth RP, Williams ED. The fate of miniplates in facial trauma and orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study. Br J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 1989;27:306–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Champy M, Loddé JP, Schmidt R, Jaegar JH, Muster D. Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg. 1978;6:14–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaushu G, Manor Y, Shoshani Y, Taicher S. Risk factors contributing to symptomatic plate removal in maxillofacial trauma patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:521–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis E 3rd, Moos KF, el-Attar A. Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;59:120–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eppley BL. Use of resorbable plates and screws in pediatric facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman KE, Vernon SE. Squamous cell carcinoma developing in conjunction with a mandibular staple bone plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983;41:265–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Francel TJ, Birely BC, Ringelman PR, Manson PN. The fate of plates and screws after facial fracture reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:568–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haug RH. Retention of asymptomatic bone plates used for orthognathic surgery and facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54:611–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kahnberg KE, Engström H. Recovery of maxillary sinus and tooth sensibility after Le Fort I osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;25(1):68–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Langford RJ, Frame JW. Surface analysis of titanium maxillofacial plates and screws retrieved from patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31:511–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis CG, Belniak RM, Plowman MC, Hopfer SM, Knight JA, Sunderman FW Jr. Intraarticular carcinogenesis bioassays of CoCrMo and TiAlV alloys in rats. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:75–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Manor Y, Chaushu G, Taicher S. Risk factors contributing to symptomatic plate removal in orthognathic surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:679–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matthew IR, Frame JW. Policy of consultant oral and maxillofacial surgeons towards removal of miniplate components after jaw fracture fixation: pilot study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:110–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mosbah MR, Oloyede D, Koppel DA, Moos KF, Stenhouse D. Miniplate removal in trauma and orthognathic surgery—a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:148–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagase DY, Courtemanche DJ, Peters DA. Plate removal in traumatic facial fractures: 13-year practice review. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(6):608–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Neumann A, Kramps M, Ragoß C, Maier HR, Jahnke K. Histological and microradiographic appearances of silicon nitride and aluminum oxide in a rabbit femur implantation model. Matwiss Werkstofftech. 2004;35:569–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Connell J, Murphy C, Ikeagwuani O, Adley C, Kearns G. The fate of titanium miniplates and screws used in maxillofacial surgery: a 10 year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(7):731–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thorén H, Snäll J, Hallermann W, Kormi E, Törnwall J. Policy of routine titanium miniplate removal after maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(9):1901–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No external funding.

Conflict of interest

Z. Pan and P. M. Patil declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

An institutional ethical committee approved the study and all patients gave written informed consent.

Institutional review board clearance

IRB clearance obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Patil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, Z., Patil, P.M. Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: to remove or remain? A retrospective study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40, 587–591 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0348-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0348-5

Keywords

Navigation