Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of the compositional differences between humic fractions isolated by the IHSS and exhaustive extraction procedures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humic substances (HSs), consisting, on the basis of solubilities in aqueous acid and basic media, of humic acids (HAs), fulvic acids (FAs), and humin (Hu), are the major components of soil organic matter (SOM). Most studies of soil/natural organic matter (SOM/NOM) have been carried out on extracts of soils in dilute sodium hydroxide solutions, the solvent used to extract the Standards of the International Humic Substances Society (IHSS). However, Hu, the major component in the classical definition of HSs, is insoluble in aqueous base and is not isolated by the traditional IHSS method. Recently, a sequential exhaustive extraction (SEE) process has been shown to be capable of isolating and separating the major components of the classically defined HSs from the soils of the temperate and tropical regions. The SEE system was used in the present study to isolate the HA/FA and Hu fractions from a subtropical volcanic Taiwanese soil. Chemical and compositional properties of these extracts were then compared with similarly obtained isolates from soils from the different climatic regions. Increases in the aliphatic relative to aromatic carbon contents were observed for both the HA and FA fractions when the pH values of the extraction media were increased. HAs and FAs isolated using the SEE method have spectroscopic profiles similar to those from the IHSS isolate; however, the cumulative extraction efficiency (%) of the SEE method (65 %) for the volcanic soil was much higher than for the traditional IHSS method (33 %). When the residual volcanic soil, following extractions once, three, and eight times with 0.1 M NaOH were then extracted with dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) plus concentrated sulphuric acid (the final solvent in the SEE sequence) it was seen that the content of crystalline polymethylene hydrocarbon (33 ppm 13C-NMR resonance in the Hu (or DMSO/acid)) extract increased relative to the amorphous methylene (30 ppm). That highlights the difficulty in dissolving the more highly ordered hydrocarbon structures that would be expected to have closer associations with the mineral colloids. Although the SEE procedure isolated all of the HAs and FAs from the Yangmingshan soil, extractability of the Hu from the volcanic soil in the DMSO/acid solvent was low (21 %), and contrasted with the much higher yields from temperate and tropical regions. The decreased Hu extraction may arise from its associations with the extensive iron and aluminium hydroxide mineral colloids in the soil. The Hu from this sub-tropical soil was different from the Hus isolated from other soil types, indicating the need to isolate and characterise these recalcitrant organic material in order to understand the organic carbon components in soils in greater detail. Such results would indicate that more attention should be given to mineral colloids in soils, and to the organo/mineral associations that will have an important role in the stabilities of OM in the soil environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken GR, McKnight DM, Wershaw RL, MacCarthy P (1985) An introduction to humic substances in soil sediment and water. In: Aiken GR, McKnight DM, Wershaw RL, MacCarthy P (eds) Humic substances in soil, sediment and water: geochemistry, isolation and characterization. Wiley, New York, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Aimin L, Minjuan X, Wenhui L, Xuejun W, Jingyu D (2008) Adsorption characterizations of fulvic acid fractions onto kaolinite. J Environ Sci 20:528–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison LE (1965) Organic carbon. In: Black CA, Evans DD, White JL, Ensminger LE, Clark FE (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldock JA, Skjemstad JO (2000) Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Org Geochem 31:697–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Senesi N, Schnitzer M (1977) Information provided on humic substances by E4/E6 ratios. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:352–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen KY, Liu JC, Chiang PN, Wang SL, Kuan WH, Tzou YM, Deng Y, Tseng KJ, Chen CC, Wang MK (2012) Chromate removal as influenced by the structural changes of soil components upon carbonization at different temperatures. Environ Pollut 162:151–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp CE, Hayes MHB (1999) Size and shapes of humic substances. Soil Sci 164:777–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp CE, Hayes MHB, Simpson AJ, Kingery WL (2005) The chemistry of soil organic matter. In: Tabatabai A, Sparks DL (eds) Chemical processes in soils. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 1–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Derenne S, Largeau C (2001) A review of some important families of refractory macromolecules: composition, origin, and fate in soils and sediments. Soil Sci 166:833–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deshmukh AP, Simpson AJ, Hadad CM, Hatcher PG (2005) Insights into the structure of cutin and cutan from Agave americana leaf cuticle using HRMAS NMR spectroscopy. Org Geochem 36:1072–1085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher PG, VanderHart DL, Earl WL (1980) Use of solid-state 13C NMR in structural studies of humic acids and humin from Holocene sediments. Org Geochem 2:87–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher P, Breger I, Maciel G, Szeverenyi N (1985) Geochemistry of humin. In: Aiken GR, McKnight DM, Wershaw RL, MacCarthy P (eds) Humic substances in soil, sediment, and water. Wiley, New York, pp 275–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes MHB (1985) Extraction of humic substances from soil. In: Aiken GR, McKnight DM, Wershaw RL, MacCarthy P (eds) Humic substances in soil, sediment, and water. Wiley, New York, pp 329–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes MHB (2006) Solvent systems for the isolation of organic components from soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:986–994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes MHB, Clapp CE (2001) Humic substances: considerations of compositions, aspects of structure, and environmental influences. Soil Sci 166:723–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes MHB, Swift RS (1978) The chemistry of soil organic colloids. In: Greenland DJ, Hayes MHB (eds) The chemistry of soil constituents. Wiley, New York, pp 179–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes TM, Hayes MHB, Skjemstad JO, Swift RS (2008) Studies of compositional relationships between organic matter in a grassland soil and its drainage waters. Eur J Soil Sci 59:603–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes TMH, Hayes MHB, Swift RS (2012) Detailed investigation of organic matter components in extracts and drainage waters from a soil under long term cultivation. Org Geochem 52:13–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges JI, Keil RG (1995) Sedimentary organic matter preservation: an assessment and speculative synthesis. Mar Chem 49:81–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang YY, Wang SL, Liu JC, Tzou YM, Chang RR, Chen JH (2008) Influences of preparative methods of humic acids on the sorption of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol. Chemosphere 70:1218–1227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S, Xing B (2005) Phenanthrene sorption to sequentially extracted soil humic acids and humins. Environ Sci Technol 39:134–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S, Amarasiriwardena D, Veneman P, Xing B (2003) Characterization of ten sequentially extracted humic acids and a humin from a soil in Western Massachusetts. Soil Sci 168:880–887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kononova MM (1966) Soil Organic Matter. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinweber P, Blumenstein O, Schulten HR (1996) Organic matter composition in sewage farm soils: investigations by 13C-NMR and pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry. Eur J Soil Sci 47:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalovic M (2009) Ancient soil chemists of the Amazon. Chem Mater 27(1):7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo A (2001) The supramolecular structure of humic substances. Soil Sci 166:810–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JA (2001) Humin. Soil Sci 166:848–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JA, MacCarthy P (1989) Isolation of humin by liquid-liquid partitioning. Sci Total Environ 81(82):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JA, MacCarthy P (1992) Disaggregation and characterization of humin. Sci Total Environ 117(118):83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson AJ, Song G, Smith E, Lam B, Novotny EH, Hayes MHB (2007) Unraveling the structural components of soil humin by use of solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 41:876–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1999) USDA NRCS Agric Handbook No. 436. US Gov Print Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Song G, Novotny EH, Simpson AJ, Clapp CE, Hayes MHB (2008) Sequential exhaustive extraction of a Mollisol soil, and characterizations of humic components, including humin, by solid and solution state NMR. Eur J Soil Sci 59:505–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song G, Hayes MHB, Novotny EH, Simpson AJ (2011) Isolation and fractionation of soil humin using alkaline urea and dimethylsulphoxide plus sulphuric acid. Naturwissenschaften 98:7–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry-genesis, composition, reactions, 2nd edn. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift RS (1985) Fractionation of soil substances. In: Aiken GR (ed) Humic substances in soil, sediment and water. Wiley, New York, pp 387–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift RS (1996) Organic matter characterization. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1018–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CC, Chen ZS, Kao CI, Ottner F, Kao SJ, Zehetner F (2010) Pedogenic Development of volcanic ash soils along a climosequence in northern Taiwan. Geoderma 156:48–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman CLS, Püttmann W (2006) Interactions between mineral phases in the preservation of soil organic matter. Geoderma 134:109–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The senior author thanks the members of the Carbolea Research Group of the University of Limerick for providing advice and chemicals. The work was financially supported by the National Science Council, ROC under project no. of 100-2917-I-005-004, 101-2313-B-005-047-MY3, and 102-2621-M-005-001, and, in part, by the Ministry of Education, ROC under the Aim for Top University (ATU) plan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. M. Tzou.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, R.R., Mylotte, R., Hayes, M.H.B. et al. A comparison of the compositional differences between humic fractions isolated by the IHSS and exhaustive extraction procedures. Naturwissenschaften 101, 197–209 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1140-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1140-4

Keywords

Navigation