Skip to main content
Log in

Planar articulated mechanism design by graph theoretical enumeration

  • Brief note
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with design of articulated mechanisms using a truss-based ground-structure representation. By applying a graph theoretical enumeration approach we can perform an exhaustive analysis of all possible topologies for a test example for which we seek a symmetric mechanism. This guarantees that one can identify the global optimum solution. The result underlines the importance of mechanism topology and gives insight into the issues specific to articulated mechanism designs compared to compliant mechanism designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Sigmund, O. 1997: On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech. Struct. Mach. 25(4), 493–524

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pedersen, C.B.W.; Buhl, T.; Sigmund, O. 2001: Topology synthesis of large-displacement compliant mechanisms. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 50(12), 2683–2705

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruns, T.E.; Tortorelli, D.A. 2001: Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190(26–27), 3443–3459

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ananthasuresh, G.K.; Kota, S.; Kikuchi, N. 1994: Strategies for systematic synthesis of compliant MEMS. Dyn. Syst. Control 2, 677–686

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sigmund, O. 1996: Some inverse problems in topology design of materials and mechanisms. In: Bestle, D.; Schielen, W. (eds.) IUTAM Symposium on Optimization of Mechanism Systems, pp 277–284. Dordrecht: Kluwer

  6. Frecker, M.I.; Ananthasuresh, G.K.; Nishiwaki, S.; Kiku-chi, N.; Kota, S. 1997: Topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms using multi-criteria optimization. J. Mech. Des. 119(2), 238–245

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harary, F. 1969: Graph theory, pp 221–222. Boston: Addison-Wesley

  8. Calladine, C.R. 1978: Buckminster Fuller’s tensegrity structures and Clerk Maxwell’s rules for the construction of stiff frame. Int. J. Solids Struct. 14, 161–172

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pellegrino, S.; Calladine, C.R. 1986: Matrix analysis of statically and kinematically indeterminate frameworks. Int. J. Solids Struct. 22(4), 409–428

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fowler, P.W.; Guest, S.D. 2000: A symmetry extension of Maxwell’s rule for rigidity of frames. Int. J. Solids Struct. 37(12), 1793–1804

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tischler, C.R.; Samuel, A.E.; Hunt, K.H. 1995: Kinematic chains for robot hands–I. orderly number-synthesis. Mech. Mach. Theory 30(8), 1193–1215

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaveh, A. 1991: Structural mechanics: graph and matrix methods. Hertfordshire, U.K.: Research Studies Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kawamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawamoto, A., Bendsøe, M. & Sigmund, O. Planar articulated mechanism design by graph theoretical enumeration. Struct Multidisc Optim 27, 295–299 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0409-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0409-9

Keywords

Navigation