Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive probability analysis using an enhanced hybrid mean value method

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an adaptive probability analysis method that can effectively generate the probability distribution of the output performance function by identifying the propagation of input uncertainty to output uncertainty. The method is based on an enhanced hybrid mean value (HMV+) analysis in the performance measure approach (PMA) for numerical stability and efficiency in search of the most probable point (MPP). The HMV+ method improves numerical stability and efficiency especially for highly nonlinear output performance functions by providing steady convergent behavior in the MPP search. The proposed adaptive probability analysis method approximates the MPP locus, and then adaptively refines this locus using an a posteriori error estimator. Using the fact that probability levels can be easily set a priori in PMA, the MPP locus is approximated using the interpolated moving least-squares method. For refinement of the approximated MPP locus, additional probability levels are adaptively determined through an a posteriori error estimator. The adaptive probability analysis method will determine the minimum number of necessary probability levels, while ensuring accuracy of the approximated MPP locus. Several examples are used to show the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive probability analysis method using the enhanced HMV+ method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bucher, C.G. 1988: Adaptive Sampling – An Iterative Fast Monte Carlo Procedure. Struct Saf5, 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, W.; Lewis, K.; Schmidt, L. 2000: Decision-Based Design: An Emerging Design Perspective. Eng Valuation Cost Anal. special edn. on “Decision-Based Design: Status & Promise” 3(1–2), 57–66

  3. Du, X.; Chen, W. 2001: A Most Probable Point-Based Method for Efficient Uncertainty Analysis. Des Manuf4(1), 47–66

    Google Scholar 

  4. Du, X.; Sudjianto, A.; Chen, W. 2003: An Integrated Framework for Optimization Using Inverse Reliability Strategy. DETC-DAC48706, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, IL, September 2003

  5. D’Errico, J.R.; Zaino, N.A. 1988: Statistical Tolerancing Using a Modification of Taguchi’s Method. Technometrics30(4), 397–405

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evans, D.H. 1972: An Application of Numerical Integration Techniques to Statistical Tolerancing, III-General Distributions. Technometrics14(1), 23–35

    Google Scholar 

  7. Evans, D.H.; Falkenburg, D.R. 1976: Computer Programs for the Quadrature Approximation for Statistical Tolerancing. J Qual Technol8(2), 108–114

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haldar, A.; Mahadevan, S. 2000: Probability. Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design. New York: Wiley

  9. Hasofer, A.M.; Lind, N.C. 1974: Exact and Invariant Second Moment Code Format. J Eng Mech Division ASCE100, 111–121

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lancaster, P.; Salkauskas, K. 1986: Curve and Surface Fitting; An Introduction. London: Academic

  11. Lee, T.W.; Kwak, B.M. 1987–88: A Reliability-Based Optimal Design Using Advanced First Order Second Moment Method. Mech Struct Mach15(4), 523–542

    Google Scholar 

  12. Madsen, H.O., Krenk, S.; Lind, N.C. 1986: Methods of Structural Safety. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

  13. Melchers, R.E. 1989: Importance Sampling in Structural Systems. Struct Saf6, 6–10

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rackwitz, R.; Fiessler, B. 1978: Structural Reliability under Combined Random Load Sequences. Comput Struct9, 484–494

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubinstein, R.Y. 1981: Simulation and Monte Carlo Method. New York: Wiley

  16. Seo, H.S.; Kwak, B.M. 2003: An Improved Reliability Analysis Using Design of Experiments and an Application to Tolerance Design. The 5th World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. Lido di Jesolo, Italy, May 19–23 2003

  17. Southwest Research Institute 1996: NESSUS/FPI User’s Manual, Version 2.3, San Antonio, TX

  18. Tu, J.; Choi, K.K. 1999: A New Study on Reliability Based Design Optimization. J Mech Des ASME121(4), 557–564

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, Y.-T. 1994: Computational Methods for Efficient Structural Reliability and Reliability Sensitivity Analysis AIAA J32(8)

  20. Wu, Y.-T.; Wirsching, P.H. 1987: New Algorithm for Structural Reliability Estimation. J Eng Mech ASCE113(9), 1319–1336

    Google Scholar 

  21. Youn, B.D.; Choi, K.K. 2003: Selecting Probabilistic Approaches for Reliability-Based Design Optimization. AIAA J42(1), 124–131

    Google Scholar 

  22. Youn, B.D.; Choi, K.K.; Gu, L.; Yang, R.-J. 2004: Reliability-Based Design Optimization for Crashworthiness of Side Impact. J Struct Multidisc Optim27(3), 272–283

    Google Scholar 

  23. Youn, B.D., Choi, K.K.; Park, Y.H. 2001, 2003: Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization. J Mech Des, ASME125(2), 221–232, 2003; Proceedings of 2001 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences: 27th Design Automation Conference. Pittsburgh, PA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K.K. Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Youn, B., Choi, K. & Du, L. Adaptive probability analysis using an enhanced hybrid mean value method. Struct Multidisc Optim 29, 134–148 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0452-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0452-6

Keywords

Navigation