Skip to main content
Log in

Further study on efficiency of sequential approximate programming for probabilistic structural design optimization

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compared to the traditional deterministic optimization based on safety factors, the probabilistic structural design optimization (PSDO) is considered to be a more rational design philosophy because of reasonable account of uncertainties in material properties, loading, boundary condition and geometry, and even mathematical representation of the system model. However, it is well known that the computation for PSDO can be prohibitive when the associated function evaluation is expensive. As a result, many approximate PSDO methods have been developed in recent literatures. In previous works, we developed two sequential approximate programming (SAP) strategies for PSDO based on reliability index approach (RIA) and performance measure approach (PMA). In PMA with SAP, a sequence of approximate programming of PSDO was formulated and solved before the final optimum was located. In each subprogramming, rather than relying on direct linear Taylor expansion of the probabilistic performance measure (PPM), we developed a formulation for approximate PPM at the current design point and used its linearization instead. The approximate PPM and its sensitivity were obtained by approximating the optimality conditions in the vicinity of the minimum performance target point (MPTP). The present paper further elaborates the SAP for PMA. In addition to detailed description of the algorithm, we present error analysis and show that in the ɛ-vicinity of optimum design and corresponding MPTP, the difference between the Taylor expansion of PPM and the linear expansion of approximate PPM is of higher order of ɛ. Four examples are optimized by six algorithms appearing in recent literatures for efficiency comparison. The effect of target reliability index and statistical distribution of random variables on the comparison is discussed. The third example shows that PMA with SAP performs well even for the problem for which reliability index calculation by first order reliability method (FORM) fails. Finally, the fourth example with 144 probabilistic constraints is shown to demonstrate the effectiveness of PMA with SAP. All example results illustrate that with the algorithm PMA with SAP, we get concurrent convergence of both design optimization and probabilistic performance measure calculation, which agrees well with the error analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chandu SVL, Grandi RV (1995) General purpose procedure for reliability based structural optimization under parametric uncertainties. Adv Eng Softw 23(1):7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng GD (1984) Basic of structural optimization and design. China Waterpower, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng GD, Xu L, Jiang L (2006) Sequential approximate programming strategy for reliability-based optimization. Comput Struct 84(21):1353–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Chen W (2002) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. In: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf. (held in Montreal) DEIC2002/DAC-34127

  • Enevoldsen I, Sorensen JD (1994) Reliability-based optimization in structural engineering. Struct Saf 15(3):169–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu L, Yang RJ (2003) Recent applications on reliability-based optimization of automotive structures. SAE World Congress and Exhibition, 2003-01-0152

  • Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) An exact and invariant first order reliability format. J Eng Mech 100(EM1):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenbichler M, Rackwitz R (1981) Non-normal dependent vectors in structural safety. J Eng Mech 107(EM6):1227–1249

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, M (1994) Ottimizzazione struttuurale: metodo a due passi e applicazioni a strutture in materiale composito. Doctorate dissertation, Polytechnic of Milan, Italy (in Italian)

  • Nikolaidis E, Burdisso R (1988) Reliability based optimization: a safety index approach. Comput Struct 28(6):781–788

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Royset JO, Kiureghian AD, Polak E (2001) Reliability-based optimal structural design by the decoupling approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 73(3):213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H, Vanderplaats G, Shyy Y-K (1992) A Study of Move Limit Adjustment Strategies in the Approximation Concepts Approach to Structural Synthesis. Proc. 4th AIAA/USAF /NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Cleveland, OH, AIAA-92-4839

  • Torng TY, Yang RJ (1993) An advanced reliability based optimization method for robust structural system design. Proc. 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Material Conference, AIAA-93-1443-CP

  • Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LP, Grandhi RV (1994) Efficient safety index calculation for structural reliability analysis. Comput Struct 52(1):103–111

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LP, Grandhi RV (1996) Safety index calculation using intervening variables for structural reliability analysis. Comput Struct 59(6):1139–1148

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Kodiyalam S (2002) An efficient method for probabilistic and robust design with non-normal distributions. In: Proc. 43rd AIAA SDM Conf. (held in Denver)

  • Wu YT, Millwater HR, Cruse TA (1990) Advanced probabilistic structural analysis method for implicit performance function. AIAA J 28(9):1663–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Cheng GD, Yi P (2005) Tolerance synthesis by a new method for system reliability-based optimization. Eng Optim 37(7):717–732

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization methods. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 26(2):152–159

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Chuang C, Gu L, Li G (2005) Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization methods II: an exhaust system problem. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 29:488–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi P, Cheng GD, Jiang L (2007) A sequential approximate programming strategy for performance-measure-based probabilistic structural design optimization. Struct Saf (in press)

  • Youn BD, Choi KK (2004) An investigation of nonlinearity of reliability-based design optimization approaches. J Mech Des 126:403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Park YH (2003) Hybrid analysis method for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 125(2):221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Yi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yi, P., Cheng, G. Further study on efficiency of sequential approximate programming for probabilistic structural design optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 35, 509–522 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0120-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0120-8

Keywords

Navigation