Skip to main content
Log in

A combined reliability analysis approach with dimension reduction method and maximum entropy method

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a combined reliability analysis approach which is composed of Dimension Reduction Method (DRM) and Maximum Entropy Method (MEM). DRM has emerged as a new approach in this field with the advantages of its sensitivity-free nature and efficiency instead of searching for the most probable point (MPP). However, in some recent implementations, the Moment Based Quadrature Rule (MBQR) in the DRM was found to be numerically instable when solving a system of linear equations for the integration points. In this study, a normalized Moment Based Quadrature Rule (NMBQR) is proposed to solve this problem, which can reduce the condition number of the coefficient matrix of the linear equations considerably and improve the robustness and stableness. Based on the statistical moments obtained by DRM+NMBQR, the MEM is applied to construct the probability density function (PDF) of the response. A number of numerical examples are calculated and compared to the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), the First Order Reliability Method (FORM), the Extended Generalized Lambda Distribution (EGLD) and Saddlepoint Approximation (SA). The results show the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method, especially for the multimodal PDF problem and multiple design point problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  • Ben Haim Y (1996) Robust reliability in the mechanical sciences. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerager P (1988) Probability integration by directional simulation. ASCE J Eng Mech 114:1285–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi CH, Won JH, Choi JH (2007) Improving the dimension reduction method (DRM) in the uncertainty analysis and application to the reliability based design optimization. In: 7th World congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization COEX. Seoul, Korea

  • Der Kiureghian A, Dakessian T (1998) Multiple design points in first- and second-order reliability. Struct Saf 20:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Chen W (2000) Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design. ASME J Mech Des 122(4):385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem A, Masoud RR, Christopher DE (2008) Reliability estimation using dimension reduction and extended generalized lambda distribution. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures structural dynamics and materials. Schaumburg, USA

  • Gu L, Yang RJ, Cho CH, Makowski M, Faruque M, Li Y (2001) Optimization and robustness for crashworthiness of side impact. Int J Veh Des 26(4):348–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasofer AM, Lind N (1974) An exact and invariant first-order reliability format. J Eng Mech 100:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Du X (2006) Uncertainty analysis by dimension reduction integration and saddlepoint approximations. J Mech Des ASME 126(1):26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106(4):620–630

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1995) Continuous univariate distributions, 2nd edn, vol 2. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ju BH, Lee BC (2007) Improved moment-Based quadrature rule and its application to reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Sci Technol 21:1162–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Mourelatos JP, Tu J (2008) A single-loop method for reliability-based design optimization. Int J Prod Dev 5(1–2):76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers RE (1989) Importance sampling in structural systems. Struct Saf 6:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie J, Ellingwood BR (2000) Directional methods for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 22:233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederreiter H, Spanier J (2000) Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Springer, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ormoneit D, White H (1999) An efficient algorithm to compute maximum entropy densities. Econom Rev 18(2):127–140

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis A, Pillai SU (2002) Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R, Fiessler B (1978) Structural reliability under combined load sequences. J Comput Struct 9:489–494

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Xu H (2004) A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Probab Eng Mech 19:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramu P, Kim NH, Haftka R (2007) Error amplification in failure probability estimates of small errors in surrogates. In: SAE 2007 World Congress. Detroit, Michigan, USA

  • Rubinstein RY (1981) Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Seo HS, Kwak BM (2002) Efficient statistical tolerance analysis for general distributions using three-point information. Int J Prod Res 40(4):931–944

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech 27:379–423

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tong XL, Zhao GF (1997) Improved Rosenblueth method and its application to structural reliability analysis. Journal of Dalian University of Technology 37(3):316–321 (in Chinese)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization methods. Struct Multidisc Optim 26:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi P, Cheng GD, Jiang L (2008) A sequential approximate programming strategy for performance-measure-based probabilistic structural design optimization. Struct Saf 30(2):91–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Gu L, Yang RJ (2004) Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of side impact. Struct Multidisc Optim 26(3–4):272–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Xi Z, Wang P (2008) Eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method for sensitivity-free probability analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 37:13–28

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A (1997) The Bayesian method of moments (BMOM): theory and applications. Adv Econom 12:85–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A, Highfield RA (1988) Calculation of maximum entropy distributions and approximation of marginal posterior distributions. J Econom 37(2):195–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YG, Ono T (2001) Moment methods for structural reliability. Struct Saf 23(1):47–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.90815023 and No.10721062), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2006CB705403) are much appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, G., Zhang, K. A combined reliability analysis approach with dimension reduction method and maximum entropy method. Struct Multidisc Optim 43, 121–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0546-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0546-2

Keywords

Navigation