Abstract
Ever increasing functionality and complexity of products and systems challenge development companies in achieving high and consistent quality. A model-based approach is used to investigate the relationship between system complexity and system robustness. The measure for complexity is based on the degree of functional coupling and the level of contradiction in the couplings. Whilst Suh’s independence axiom states that functional independence (uncoupled designs) produces more robust designs, this study proves this not to be the case for max-/min-is-best requirements, and only to be true in the general sense for nominal-is-best requirements. In specific cases, the independence axiom has exceptions as illustrated with a machining example, showing how a coupled solution is more robust than its uncoupled counterpart. This study also shows with statistical significance, that for max- and min-is-best requirements, the robustness is most affected by the level of contradiction between coupled functional requirements (p = 1.4e−36). In practice, the results imply that if the main influencing factors for each function in a system are known in the concept phase, an evaluation of the contradiction level can be used to evaluate concept robustness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert R, Barabási A-L (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47–97. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
Altshuller G (1996) And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Technology
Apple (2015) Apple iPhone technical specifications. https://support.apple.com/specs/iphone
Box GEP, Meyer RD (1986) An analysis for unreplicated fractional factorials. Technometrics. doi:10.2307/1269599
Box GEP, Wilson KB (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J R Stat Soc 13(1959):1–45. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_23
Braha D, Bar-Yam Y (2004) Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks. J Inf Technol 19(4):244–253. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000030
Braha D, Bar-Yam Y (2007) The statistical mechanics of complex product development: empirical and analytical results. Manag Sci 53(7):1127–1145. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0617
Braha D, Maimon O (1998) The measurement of a design structural and functional complexity. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 28(4):527–535. doi:10.1109/3468.686715
Braha D, Brown DC, Chakrabarti A, Dong A, Fadel G, Maier JRA, Wood K (2013) DTM at 25: essays on themes and future directions. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ASME international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference IDETC/CIE. Portland, Oregon, pp 1–17
Bras BA, Mistree F (1993) Robust design using compromise decision support problems. Eng Optim. doi:10.1080/03052159308940976
Carlson JM, Doyle J (2000) Highly optimized tolerance: robustness and power laws in. Complex Systems. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.60.1412
Chipman H, Hamada M, Wu CFJ (1997) Variable-selection Bayesian approach for analyzing designed experiments with complex aliasing. Technometrics 39:372–381. doi:10.1080/00401706.1997.10485156
Ebro M, Howard TJ (2016) Robust design principles for reducing variation in functional performance. J Eng Des. doi:10.1080/09544828.2015.1103844
Ebro M, Howard TJ, Rasmussen JJ (2012) The foundation for robust design: enabling robustness through kinematic design and design clarity. In: Proceedings of international design conference, DESIGN, vol DS 70, pp 817–826
Eifler T, Olesen JL, Howard TJ (2014) Robustness and reliability of the GM ignition switch—a forensic engineering case. In: 1st International symposium on robust design, pp. 51–58
El-Haik B, Yang K (1999) The components of complexity in engineering design. IIE Trans 31(10):925–934. doi:10.1080/07408179908969893
Frey DD, Li X (2008) Using hierarchical probability models to evaluate robust parameter design methods. J Qual Technol 40(1):59–77
Frey D, Palladino J, Sullivan J, Atherton M (2007) Part count and design of robust systems. Syst Eng 10(3):203–221. doi:10.1002/sys.20071
Göhler SM, Howard TJ (2015) The contradiction index—a new metric combining system complexity and robustness for early design stages. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, pp 1–10
Göhler SM, Eifler T, Howard TJ (2016) Robustness metrics: consolidating the multiple approaches to quantify robustness. J Mech Des. doi:10.1115/1.4034112
Gribble SD (2001) Robustness in complex systems. In: Proceedings eighth workshop on hot topics in operating systems, pp. 17–22. doi:10.1109/HOTOS.2001.990056
Hillier VAW, Coombes P (2004) Hillier’s fundamentals of motor vehicle technology. Nelson Thornes, Cheltenham
Jackson A (2013) A road to safety: evolution of car safety features. http://visual.ly/evolution-car-safety-features
Kutner MH, Nachtsheim C, Neter J (2004) Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York
Lenth R (1989) Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated factorials. Technometrics. doi:10.2307/1269997
Magee CL, de Weck OL (2004) Complex System Classification. Incose. doi:10.1002/j.2334-5837.2004.tb00510.x
Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Tarantola S (2008) Global sensitivity analysis: The primer. Wiley, Chichester
Slagle JC (2007) Architecting complex systems for robustness. In: Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sosa M, Mihm J, Browning T (2011) Degree distribution and quality in complex engineered systems. J Mech Des 133(10):101008. doi:10.1115/1.4004973
Suh NP (2001) Axiomatic design: advances and applications. Oxford University Press, New York
Summers JD, Shah JJ (2010) Mechanical engineering design complexity metrics: size, coupling, and solvability. J Mech Des. doi:10.1115/1.4000759
Taguchi G, Chowdhury S, Wu Y (2005) Taguchi’s quality engineering handbook. Wiley, Hoboken
Wu CJ, Hamada MS (2011) Experiments: planning, analysis, and optimization. Wiley, Hoboken
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Novo Nordisk for their support for this research project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Göhler, S.M., Frey, D.D. & Howard, T.J. A model-based approach to associate complexity and robustness in engineering systems. Res Eng Design 28, 223–234 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0236-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0236-1