Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-criteria genetic optimization for distribution network problems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a multi-criterion genetic optimization for solving distribution network problems in supply chain management. Distribution problems deal with distribution from a number of sources to a number of destinations, in which various decision factors are closely related and influence each other. Genetic algorithms have been widely adopted as the optimization tool in solving these problems. This paper combines analytic hierarchy processes with genetic algorithms to capture the capability of multi-criterion decision-making. The proposed algorithm allows decision-makers to give weightings for criteria using a pairwise comparison approach. The numerical results obtained from the new approach are compared with the results obtained from linear programming. The result shows that the proposed algorithm is reliable and robust. In addition, it provides more control for decision-makers on the determination of the optimization solutions, and gains more information for a better insight into the distribution network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marcel M, Evers JJM (1996) Distribution network design: an integrated planning support framework. Logistics Inf Manage 9(11):85-58

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yrjölä H (2001) Physical distribution considerations for electronic grocery shopping. Int J Phys Distrib Logistic Manage 31(10):786-761

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alshawi S (2001) Logistics in the Internet age: towards a holistic information and processes picture. Logistics Inf Manage 18(8):235-281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stank TP, Goldsby TF (2000) A framework for transportation decision making in an integrated supply chain. Logistics Inf Manage 5(2):71-77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Milgate A (2001) Supply chain complexity and delivery performance: an international exploratory study. Supply Chain Manage Int J 6(3):106-118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson I (1995) Distribution control systems within the supply chain. Logistics Inf Manage 8(3):80-82

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chakraborty M, Gupta S (2002) Fuzzy mathematical programming for multi objective linear fractional programming problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst 125(3):335-382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mármol AM, Puerto J, Fernández FR (2002) Sequential incorporation of imprecise information in multiple criteria decision process. Eur J Oper Res 137(1):123-133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdinnour-Helm S (1999) Network design in supply chain management. Int J Agile Manage Syst 1(2):99-106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vignaux GA, Michalewica Z (1991) A Genetic Algorithm for the Linear Transportation Problem. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 21(2):445-452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Glover F (1986) Future paths for integer programming links to artificial intelligence. Comput Oper Res 13(5):533-589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Glover F (1989) Tabu Search part I. ORSA J Comput 1(3):190-206

    Google Scholar 

  13. González EL, Fernández MA (2000) Genetic optimization of a fuzzy distribution model. Int J Phys Distrib Logistic Manage 30(7/8):681-696

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miznuma H, Watada J (1995) Fuzzy mixed integer programming based on genetic algorithm and its application to resource distribution. Jpn J Fuzzy Theory Syst 7(1):97-116

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoek RIV, Chong I (2001) Epilogue: UPS Logistics – practical approaches to the e-supply chain. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 31(6):863-868

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ballou RH (1999) Business Logistics Management, 8th edn. Prentice Hall, NJ

  17. Dano S (1972) Linear programming, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag/Wien

  18. Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, NY

  19. Teltumbe A (2000) A framework for evaluating ERP projects. Int J Prod Res 38(17):8507-8520

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty TL (1994) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, Vol. 6, RWS Publications, 1994

  21. Dawid H (1996) Adaptive Learning by Genetic Algorithms Analytical Results and Applications to Economic Models, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 881. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  22. Al-Hakin L (2000) A note on A genetic algorithm approach for multiple criteria facility layout design. Int J Prod Res 38(8):985-989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Hakin L (2001) An analogue genetic algorithm for solving job shop scheduling problems. Int J Prod Res 39(7):1537-1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DeJong KA (1975) An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive system, Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan

  25. Onwubolu GC, Kumalo T (2001) Optimization of multipass turning operations with genetic algorithms. Int J Prod Res 39(16):3727-3785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Onwubolu GC, Muting M (2001) Optimizing the multiple constrained resources product mix problem using genetic algorithms. Int J Prod Res 39(9):1897-1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F.T.S. Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, F., Chung, S. Multi-criteria genetic optimization for distribution network problems. AMT 24, 517–532 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-002-1445-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-002-1445-5

Keywords

Navigation