Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity-based conceptual design and tolerance allocation using the continuous ants colony algorithm (CACO)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an assembly, there are two ways to control the deviation of critical dimensions. One is by keeping the deviation of the critical dimension small by tightening manufacturing tolerances and controlling aging and environmental effects. This approach is traditional and expensive, as it requires tighter manufacturing tolerances and protection from aging and the environment. The second is by moving the nominal values of the non-critical dimensions to a less sensitive portion. This approach is very helpful in improving the quality with no additional cost. One can analyze any number of designs very early in the concept development stage of a project. After the concept design the cost-based optimal tolerances for the corresponding dimensions are allocated. The continuous ants colony algorithm, a kind of meta-heuristic approach, is used as an optimization tool for minimizing the critical dimension deviation and allocating the cost- based optimal tolerances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ullman D (1992) The mechanical design process. McGraw-Hill, New York

  2. Chase KW, Greenwood WH (1988) Design issues in mechanical tolerance analysis. Manuf Rev 1:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chase KW, Gao J, Magleby SP (1995) General 2-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematics adjustments. J Des Manuf, pp 287

  4. Sutherland GH, Roth B (1975) Mechanism designs: accounting for manufacturing tolerances and costs in function generating problems. ASME J Eng Ind 98:283–286

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee WJ, Woo TC (1989) Optimum selection of discrete tolerances. ASME J Mech Trans Automat Des 111:243–251

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dong Z, Hu W, Xue D (1994) New production cost-tolerance models for tolerance synthesis. J Eng Ind 116:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kalyanmoy D (1996) Optimization for engineering design. (Prentice-Hall), New York

  8. Dorgio M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1996) Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 26:29–41

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jayaraman VK, Kulkarni BD, Sachin K, Prakash S (2000) Ant colony framework for optimal design and scheduling of batch plants. Comput Chem Eng 24:1901–1910

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chase KW (1999) Tolerance allocation methods for designers. ADCATS report no. 99-6

  11. Moreo D, Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G (2000) Ant algorithm and stigmery. Fut Generation Comput Syst 16:851–871

    Google Scholar 

  12. Creveling CM (1997) Computer aided tolerancing techniques: a handbook for developing optimal specifications. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chase KW (1999) Minimum cost-tolerance allocation. ADCATS report 99-5

  14. Ho Y-C, Moodie CL (1998) Machine layout with a single row flow path in an automated manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 17:1–2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Prabhaharan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prabhaharan, G., Asokan, P. & Rajendran, S. Sensitivity-based conceptual design and tolerance allocation using the continuous ants colony algorithm (CACO). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25, 516–526 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1846-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1846-0

Keywords

Navigation