Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation space for open architecture controllers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing open architecture controllers have different architectures and methods for realization, but none of them have been generally accepted or been widely applied in industry. Moreover, there is little literature that analyzes and compares these different open architecture controllers synthetically. So this paper establishes an evaluation space for open architecture controllers, a new method to analyze and compare the different open architecture controllers. The evaluation space enables the full evaluation of the open architectures and can easily find the controller’s advantages and disadvantages. The evaluation space for open architecture controllers is a multidimensional space, whose dimensions can be categorized as the requirement dimensions and the architecture dimensions. The requirement dimensions define different requirements of the open architecture controllers, and the architecture dimensions define the different realization methods of open architecture controllers. Establishing the relationships between the requirement dimensions and the architecture dimensions, the evaluation space can calculate the degree to which the different architectures meet the requirements of open architecture controllers, and then the integrated evaluation of different open architecture controllers can be obtained. Several typical open architecture controllers, such as NGC, OSACA, OMAC and OSEC, are compared based on the evaluation space; some valuable conclusions have been drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marietta M (1994) Next generation controller specification for an open system architecture standard (SOSAS) NGC project report

  2. OSACA Consortium (1996) Open system architecture for controls within automation (OSACA) systems. ESPRIT III project Final Report

  3. OSE Consortium (1998) OSEC-II project technical report – development of open system environment for controller (OSEC)

  4. OMAC API Work Group (1999) OMAC API SET working document, version 0.20

  5. Home for users of the Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC). http://www.linuxcnc.org/

  6. Erol NA, Altintas Y, Ito M (2000) Open architecture modular tool kit for motion and machining process control. Trans ASME/IEEE J Mechatron 5(3) :281–291

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shiu C, et al. (1998) Specifying reconfigurable control flow for open architecture controllers. Proceedings of the 1998 Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, vol. 2, pp 659–666

  8. Yonglin C, Jianguo C, Zuyu W (2003) Platform for an open architecture controller based on a general operation system with a hard real-time extension. Int J Prod Res 41:2839–2850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaw M, Garlan D (1996) Software architecture: perspectives on an emerging discipline. Prentice-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi Yonglin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yonglin, C. An evaluation space for open architecture controllers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26, 351–358 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2111-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2111-x

Keywords

Navigation