Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric optimisation of wire electrical discharge machining of γ titanium aluminide alloy through an artificial neural network model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present research, wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) of γ titanium aluminide is studied. Selection of optimum machining parameter combinations for obtaining higher cutting efficiency and accuracy is a challenging task in WEDM due to the presence of a large number of process variables and complicated stochastic process mechanisms. In general, no perfect combination exists that can simultaneously result in both the best cutting speed and the best surface finish quality. This paper presents an attempt to develop an appropriate machining strategy for a maximum process criteria yield. A feed-forward back-propagation neural network is developed to model the machining process. The three most important parameters – cutting speed, surface roughness and wire offset – have been considered as measures of the process performance. The model is capable of predicting the response parameters as a function of six different control parameters, i.e. pulse on time, pulse off time, peak current, wire tension, dielectric flow rate and servo reference voltage. Experimental results demonstrate that the machining model is suitable and the optimisation strategy satisfies practical requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scott D, Boyina S, Rajurkar KP (1991) Analysis and optimization of parameter combinations in wire electrical discharge machining. Int J Prod Res 29:2189–2207

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarng YS, Ma SC, Chung LK (1995) Determination of optimal cutting parameters in wire electrical discharge machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35:1693–1701

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liao YS, Huang JT, Su HC (1997) A study on the machining – parameters optimisation of wire electrical discharge machining. J Mater Process Technol 71:487–493

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spedding TA and Wang ZQ (1997) Study on modeling of wire EDM process. J Mater Process Technol 69:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karthikkeyan R et al. (1999) Mathematical modeling for electric discharge machining of aluminum – silicon carbide particulate composites. J Mater Process Technol 87:59–63

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang JT, Liao YS, Hsue WJ (1999) Determination of finish-cutting operation number and machining parameters setting in wire electrical discharge machining. J Mater Process Technol 87:69–81

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tsai KM, Wang PJ (2001) Predictions on surface finish in electrical discharge machining based upon neural network models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1385–1403

    Google Scholar 

  8. Voice W (1999) Future use of gamma titanium aluminides by Rolls-Royce. Aircraft Eng Aero Technol 71(4):337–340

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guedes A, Pinto AMP, Vieira M, Viana F, Ramos AS, Vieira MT (2002) Microstructural characterization of γ-TiAl Joints. Key Eng Mater 230-232:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pan B, Kim DJ, Kim BM, Dean TA (2001) Incremental deformation and the forgeability of γ titanium aluminide. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:749–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharman ARC, Aspinwall DK, Dewes RC, Clifton D, Bowen P (1973) The effects of machined workpiece surface integrity on the fatigue life of γ-titanium aluminide. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1681–1685

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zaltin N, Field M (1973) Procedures and precautions in machining titanium alloys. Titanium Sci Technol 1:489–504

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bentley SA, Mantle AL, Aspinwall DK (1999) The effect of machining on the fatigue strength of a gamma titanium aluminide intermetallic alloy. Intermetallics 7:967–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dauw DF, Sthioul H, Delpretti R, Tricarico C (1989) Wire analysis and control for precision EDM cutting. Ann CIRP 38(1):191–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Puri AB, Bhattacharyya B (2003) Modeling and analysis of the wire tool vibration in wire-cut EDM. Int J Mater Process Technol 141(3)295–301

    Google Scholar 

  16. Puri AB, Bhattacharyya B (2003) An analysis and optimization of the geometrical inaccuracy due to wire lag phenomenon in WEDM. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(2):151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kao JY, Tarng YS (1997) A neural-network approach for the on-line monitoring of the electrical discharge machining process. J Mater Process Technol 69:112–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liao TW, Chen JL (1994) A neural network approach for grinding process: modeling and optimization. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 34:919–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fausett L (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, algorithms and applications. Prentice-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haykin S (2002) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Pearson, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Bhattacharyya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarkar, S., Mitra, S. & Bhattacharyya, B. Parametric optimisation of wire electrical discharge machining of γ titanium aluminide alloy through an artificial neural network model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27, 501–508 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2203-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2203-7

Keywords

Navigation