Skip to main content
Log in

Bursting failure prediction in tube hydroforming using FLSD

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In tube hydroforming, circular components are hydrobulged or hydroformed from tubular blanks with internal pressure and simultaneous axial loading. Thus the tube can be fed into the deformation zone during the bulge operation allowing more expansion and less thinning without any defects such as wrinkling, buckling, and bursting. By contrast with the buckling and the wrinkling, the bursting is generally classified as an irrecoverable failure mode. Hence in order to obtain the sound hydroformed products, it is necessary to predict the bursting behavior and to analyze the effects of process parameters on this failure condition in hydroforming processes. In this study, a forming limit stress diagram (FLSD) is constructed by plotting the calculated principal stresses based on the local necking criterion. Using the theoretical FLSD, we carry out the numerical prediction of bursting failure in a hydroforming process, which usually has non-linear strain path. Finite element analyses are carried out to find out the state of stresses during simple hydroforming operation, in which the FLSD is utilized as the forming limit criterion for assessment of the initiation of necking, and influences of the material parameters on the formability are investigated. In addition, the numerical results obtained from the FEM combined with the FLSD are confirmed with a series of bulge tests in view of bursting pressure and show a good agreement. Consequently, it is shown that the theoretical and numerical approach to bursting failure prediction proposed in this paper will provide a feasible method to satisfy the increasing practical demands for assessment of the forming severity in hydroforming processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim J, Kim SW, Song WJ, Kang BS (2004) Analytical approach to bursting in tube hydroforming using diffuse plastic instability. Int J Mech Sci 46:1535–1547 DOI 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.09.001

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamada Y, Aoki I (1966) On the tensile plastic instability in axi-symmetric deformation of sheet metals. J JSTP 67:393–406 (Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xing HL, Makinouchi A (2001) Numerical analysis and design for tubular hydroforming. Int J Mech Sci 43:1009–1026 DOI 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00046-1

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Tirosh J, Neuberger A, Shirizly A (1996) On tube expansion by internal fluid pressure with additional compressive stress. Int J Mech Sci 38:839–851 DOI 10.1016/0020-7403(95)00113-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia ZC (2001) Failure analysis of tubular hydroforming. J Eng Mater Technol 123:423–429 DOI 10.1115/1.1394966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nefussi G, Combescure A (2002) A Coupled buckling and plastic instability for tube hydroforming. Int J Mech Sci 44:899–914 DOI 10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00031-0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kleemola HJ, Pelkkikangas MT (1977) Effect of predeformation and strain path on the forming limits of steel, copper and brass. Sheet Met Ind 63:591–599

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arrieux R, Bedrin C, Bovin M (1982) Determination of an intrinsic forming limit stress diagram for isotropic metal sheets. Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Congress of the IDDRG 61–71

  9. Stoughton TB (1999) A general forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 42:1–27 DOI 10.1016/S0020-7403(98)00113-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stoughton TB, Zhu X (2004) Review of theoretical models of the strain-based FLD and their relevance to the stress-based FLD. Int J Plast 20:1463–1486 DOI 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zimniak Z (2000) Implementation of the forming limit stess diagram in FEM simulations. J Mater Process Technol 106:261–266 DOI 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00627-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hill R (1983) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim J, Kim YW, Kang BS, Hwang SM (2004) Finite element analysis for bursting failure prediction in bulge forming of a seamed tube. Finite Elem Anal Des 40:953–966 DOI 10.1016/j.finel.2003.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keeler SP (2000) Forming limits for hydroforming and other simulations. EUROPAM Conference 2000

  15. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2000) Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. Wiley, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen BN, Johnson KI, Khaleel MA (2003) Analysis of tube hydroforming using an inverse approach with FLD-based adjustment of process parameters. J Eng Mater Technol 125:133–140 DOI 10.1115/1.1555651

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SW., Song, WJ., Kang, BS. et al. Bursting failure prediction in tube hydroforming using FLSD. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41, 311–322 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1488-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1488-3

Keywords

Navigation