Skip to main content
Log in

Kinetostatic modeling of Exechon parallel kinematic machine for stiffness analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exechon machines are a new type of parallel kinematic machines, which have been proven experimentally to be competitive in terms of accuracy, reliability, and operation speed. The proven performance is partially contributed by its unique layout of three prismatic legs; its kinematic structure is overconstrained. Higher accuracy is a primary goal for the use of an Exechon machine; accuracy relies on system stiffness and rigidity. However, the works on the stiffness analysis of Exechon machines has been limited to some numerical results from finite element analysis; no correlation between the motions and stiffness change has been studied systematically. To gain a thorough understanding of the impact of the overconstraints on system stiffness, the kinetostatic method is used for stiffness analysis. Jacobian matrices of kinematics have been derived, and they are used to develop the system stiffness model of the machine. The Exechon X700 model has been used as a case study to illustrate the process of stiffness analysis. The stiffness model is established and quantifiable comparison has been made between simulation and test data to verify the effectiveness of the stiffness model. The developed stiffness model can be applied to optimize machine structure or trajectory planning based on the specified task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Griffis M, Duffy J (1993) Global stiffness modelling of a class of simple compliant couplings. Mech Mach Theory 28(2):207–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciblak N, Lipkin H (1994) Asymmetric Cartesian stiffness for the modelling of compliant robotic systems. Proc ASME Conf Robot Kinemat Dyn Contr 72:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alici G, Shirinzadeh B (2005) Enhanced stiffness modelling, identification and characterization for robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot 21(4):554–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xi F, Zhang D, Mechefske CM, Lang SYT (2004) Global kinetostatic modelling of tripod-based parallel kinematic machine. Mech Mach Theory 39:357–377

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang D, Xi F, Mechedske CM, Lang SYT (2004) Analysis of parallel kinematic machine with kinematic modelling method. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 20:151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moaveni S (2003) Finite element analysis: theory and application with ANSYS. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ. ISBN 0-13-111202-3

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ramachandran S, Nagarajan T, Prasad NS (1992) A finite element approach to the design and dynamic analysis of platform type robot manipulators. Finite Elem Anal Des 10:335–350

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Clinton CM, Zhang G, Wavering AJ (1997) Stiffness modeling of a Stewart-platform-based milling machine. Transact North Am Manuf Res Inst SM 25:335–340

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang T, Zhao X, Whitehouse (2002) Stiffness estimation of a tripod-based parallel kinematic machine. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 18(1):50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gosselin C (1990) Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 6(3):377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Majou F, Wenger P, Chablat D (2001) The design of parallel kinematic machine tools using kinetostatic performance criteria. The Proc. 3rd International Conference on Metal Cutting, Metz, France

  12. Tsai L-W, Joshi S (2001) Comparison study of architectures of four 3 degree-of-freedom translational parallel manipulators. Proceedings of the 2001 I.E. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul, Korea, May 21–28, pp. 1283–1288

  13. Goldsmith PB (2002) Kinematics and stiffness of a symmetrical 3-UPU translational parallel manipulator. Proceedings of the 2002 I.E. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 4102–4107

  14. Muller A, Maiber P (2001) Kinematic and dynamic properties of parallel manipulators. Multibod Sys Dyn 5:223–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang D, Gosselin CM (2002) Parallel kinematic machine design with kinetostatic model. Robotia 20:429–438

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang D, Gosselin CM (2002) Kinetostatic analysis and design optimization of the tricept machine tool family. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:725–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bi ZM, Lang SYT, Zhang D (2005) Stiffness analysis of a tripod with a passive link. Am Soc Mech Eng Dyn Syst Contr Divi-DSC 74(2B):1665–1671

    Google Scholar 

  18. EI-Khasawneh BS, Ferreira PM (1999) Computation of stiffness and stiffness bounds for parallel link manipulators. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:321–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bi ZM, Lang SYT, Verner M, Orban P (2008) Development of reconfigurable machines. Adv Manuf Technol 39(11–12):1227–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. NeuMann K-E (2008) Adaptive in-jig high load Exechon machining & assembly technology. SAE International, Paper No. 08AMT-0044

  21. NeuMann K-E (2011) IEEE/IFR invention & entrepreneurship award 2011. http://www.ifr.org/uploads/media/01_IERA_application_neumann.pdf

  22. Bi ZM, Jin Y (2011) Kinematics modelling of Exechon parallel kinematic machine. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27(1):186–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Glenn Murray (2001) Rotation about an arbitrary axis in 3 dimensions, http://inside.mines.edu/~gmurray/ArbitraryAxisRotation/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. M. Bi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bi, Z.M. Kinetostatic modeling of Exechon parallel kinematic machine for stiffness analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71, 325–335 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5482-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5482-z

Keywords

Navigation