Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supplier selection is one of the critical problems in supply chain systems. Within the last decades, by the emergence of sustainability concept, companies have been motivated to enhance their supplier’s sustainability and move toward sustainable development. This paper proposes a structured and integrated decision model for evaluating sustainable suppliers in the context of telecom industry by combining analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and improved grey relational analysis (IGRA) approaches. The proposed model employs AHP for calculating sustainability criteria weights and IGRA for ranking suppliers. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is also performed to demonstrate the robustness of the model. In this research, the sustainable supplier selection problem of the telecom industry in the southern part of Iran was investigated, showing the effectiveness and applicability of this proposed integrated approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Önüt S, Kara I (2009) Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Syst Appl 36(2, Part 2):3887–3895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciliberti F, Pontrandolfo S (2008) Logistics social responsibility: standard adoption and practices in Italian companies. Int J Prod Econ 113(1):88–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16(15):1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Büyüközkan G, Çifçi (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):3000–3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li G, Yamaguchi D, Nagai M (2007) A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. Math Comput Model 46(3–4):573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahi P, Searcy C (2013) A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 52:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kannan D, Khodaverdi R, Olfat L, Jafarian A, Diabat A (2013) Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J Clean Prod 47:355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone, UK

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norman W, MacDonald C (2004) Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line. Bus Ethics Q 14(02):243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gauthier C (2005) Measuring corporate social and environmental performance: the extended life-cycle assessment. J Bus Ethics 59(1/2):199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zailani S, Jeyaraman K, Vengadasan G, Premkumar R (2012) Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: a survey. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):330–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Genovese A, Lenny Koh S, Bruno G, Esposito E (2013) Greener supplier selection: state of the art and some empirical evidence. Int J Prod Res 51(10):2868–2886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai C, Sarkis J (2010) Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory. J Clean Prod 18(12):1200–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chinander R (2001) Aligning accuntability and awareness for environmental performance in operations. Prod Oper Manag 10(3):276–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Y (2008) The driver of green innovation and green image—green core competence. J Bus Ethics 81(3):531–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sollish, F, Semanik J (2011) Strategic global sourcing: best practices. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Wiley

  17. Sarkis J (2001) Manufacturing’s role in corporate environmental sustainability—concerns for the new millennium. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(5/6):666–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuo RJ, Wang YC, Tien FC (2010) Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod 18(12):1161–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee AHI, Kang HY, Hsu CF, Hung HC (2009) A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):7917–7927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Azevedo SaC, Elizabeth AaG, Antonio a C, Helena a C, Machado V (2012) The influence of eco-innovation supply chain practices on business eco-efficiency. Available from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/42704.

  21. Darnall N, Edwards D (2006) Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: the role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strateg Manag J 27(4):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrow D, Rondinelli D (2002) Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS Certification. Eur Manag J 20(2):159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ (2001) An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. Eur J Oper Res 135(1):102–113

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Vachon S (2007) Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4357–4379

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Hasanov P, Jaber MY, Zolfaghari S (2012) Production, remanufacturing and waste disposal models for the cases of pure and partial backordering. Appl Math Model 36(11):5249–5261

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Hsu KT (2012) The advertising effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and brand equity: evidence from the life insurance industry in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 109(2):189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Azadnia AH, Saman MZM, Wong KY (2015) Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process. Int J Prod Res 53(2):383–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bai C, Sarkis J (2010) Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. Int J Prod Econ 124(1):252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Azadnia AH, Saman MZM, Ghadimi P, Zakuan N (2012) Sustainable supplier selection based on self-organizing map neural network and multi criteria decision making approaches. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 65:879–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Jafarian A (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J Clean Prod 47:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dickson GW (1966) An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. J Purch 2(1):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weber CA, Current JR, Benton WC (1991) Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur J Oper Res 50(1):2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):16–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Asadabadi M (2014) A hybrid QFD-based approach in addressing suppler selection problem in product improvement process. Int J Ind Eng Comput 5(4):543–560

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ghodsypour SH, O’Brien C (1998) A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Int J Prod Econ 56–57:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Baskaran V, Nachiappan S, Rahman S (2012) Indian textile suppliers’ sustainability evaluation using the grey approach. Int J Prod Econ 135(2):647–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shaw K, Shankar R, Yadav SS, Thakur LS (2012) Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 39(9):8182–8192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Amindoust A, Ahmed S, Saghafinia A, Bahreininejad A (2012) Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput 12(6):1668–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang Y, Tao F, Laili Y, Hou B, Lv L, Zhang L (2013) Green partner selection in virtual enterprise based on Pareto genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9):2109–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shen L, Olfat L, Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Diabat A (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resour Conserv Recycl 74:170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Handfield R, Walton SV, Sroufe R, Melnyk SA (2002) Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 141(1):70–87

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Tsai WH, Hung SJ (2009) Treatment and recycling system optimisation with activity-based costing in WEEE reverse logistics management: an environmental supply chain perspective. Int J Prod Res 47(19):5391–5420

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Ng WL (2008) An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. Eur J Oper Res 186(3):1059–1067

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill

  45. Deng (1989) Introduction to grey system theory. Grey system

  46. Tseng ML, Chiang JH, Lan LW (2009) Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral. Comput Ind Eng 57(1):330–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fu X, Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2012) Evaluating green supplier development programs at a telecommunications systems provider. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liang RH (1999) Application of grey relation analysis to hydroelectric generation scheduling. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 21(5):357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tsai CH, Chang CL, Chen L (2003) Applying grey relational analysis to the vendor evaluation model. Int J Comput Internet Manag 11(3):45–53

    Google Scholar 

  50. Golmohammadi D, Mellat-Parast M (2012) Developing a grey-based decision-making model for supplier selection. Int J Prod Econ 137(2):191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vijayvagy L (2012) Decision framework for supplier selection through multi criteria evaluation models in supply chain. Int J Manag Innov 4(2):16–28

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dai J, Blackhurst J (2011) A four-phase AHP–QFD approach for supplier assessment: a sustainability perspective. Int J Prod Res 50(19):5474–5490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Chan FTS (2003) Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. Int J Prod Res 41(15):3549–3579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu L, Kumar DT, Shankar KM, Kannan D, Chen G (2013) Analyzing criteria and sub-criteria for the corporate social responsibility-based supplier selection process using AHP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(1):907–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sarmiento R, Thomas A (2010) Identifying improvement areas when implementing green initiatives using a multitier AHP approach. Benchmark: An Int J 17(3):452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mani V, Agrawal R, Sharma V (2014) Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India. Int Strateg Manag Rev 2(2):98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Dan DY, Liaghat M, Shahabi H, Deilami BR, Ardabili FS, Seyedi SN, Badri H (2013) 4th International Conference on Environmental Science and Development—ICESD 2013A multi-criteria evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process technique to analyze coastal tourism sites. APCBEE Procedia 5:479–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rajesh R, Ravi V (2015) Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis approach. J Clean Prod 86:343–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pophali GR, Chelani AB, Dhodapkar RS (2011) Optimal selection of full scale tannery effluent treatment alternative using integrated AHP and GRA approach. Expert Syst Appl 38(9):10889–10895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tseng ML (2010) Using linguistic preferences and grey relational analysis to evaluate the environmental knowledge management capacity. Expert Syst Appl 37(1):70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Manzardo A, Ren J, Mazzi A, Scipioni A (2012) A grey-based group decision-making methodology for the selection of hydrogen technologies in life cycle sustainability perspective. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(23):17663–17670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wu HH (2002) A comparative study of using grey relational analysis in multiple attribute decision making problems. Qual Eng 15(2):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen YT, Chou TY (2011) Applying GRA and QFD to improve library service quality. J Acad Librariansh 37(3):237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pitchipoo P, Venkumar P, Rajakarunakaran S (2013) Fuzzy hybrid decision model for supplier evaluation and selection. Int J Prod Res 51(13):3903–3919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chan FTS, Chan HK (2004) Development of the supplier selection model—a case study in the advanced technology industry. J Eng Manuf 218(12):1807–1824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Bruno G, Esposito E, Genovese A, Passaro R (2012) AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: problems and perspectives. J Purch Supply Manag 18(3):159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sharma S, Dubey D (2010) Multiple sourcing decisions using integrated AHP and knapsack model: a case on carton sourcing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(9):1171–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Chai J, Liu JNK, Ngai EWT (2013) Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst Appl 40(10):3872–3885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Saaty TL (2000) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process .Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, Vol. 6

  70. Anderson D, Sweeney D, Williams T, Jeffrey DC, R KM (1994) An introduction to management science: quantitative approaches to decision making. New York: West Publishing Company

  71. Kuo Y, Yang T, Huang GW (2008) The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Comput Ind Eng 55(1):80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Lee WS, Lin YC (2011) Evaluating and ranking energy performance of office buildings using grey relational analysis. Energy 36(5):2551–2556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hashemi SH, Karimi A, Tavana M (2015) An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved grey relation analysis. Int J Prod Econ 159:178–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Copeland MV (2006) The mighty micro-multinational, in Business 2.0: 106–114

  75. Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Hall JH (2016) Economic growth, development of telecommunications infrastructure, and financial development in Asia, 1991–2012. Q Rev Econ Financ 59:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Sadjadi SJ, Omrani H (2010) A bootstrapped robust data envelopment analysis model for efficiency estimating of telecommunication companies in Iran. Telecommun Policy 34(4):221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116023, People’s Republic of China

    Hadi Badri Ahmadi & Xuping Wang

  2. Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad Ave., Nasr Bridge, Tehran, Iran

    Seyed Hamid Hashemi Petrudi

  3. School of Business, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning Province, 124221, People’s Republic of China

    Xuping Wang

Authors
  1. Hadi Badri Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seyed Hamid Hashemi Petrudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xuping Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Hamid Hashemi Petrudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Badri Ahmadi, H., Hashemi Petrudi, S.H. & Wang, X. Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 2413–2427 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9518-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9518-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation