Abstract
In the last decade, robot manufacturers have started to produce collaborative industrial robots, that can work while safely sharing the workspace with a human operator. In this way, robot repeatability, combined with human dexterity, can move automated assembly to a new level of flexibility. The aim of this paper is to investigate the conditions at which such systems, called collaborative assembly systems (CAS), can be better performing than the traditional manual or automated assembly systems. Throughput and unit direct production cost are considered for the comparison. The estimation of such performance figures, which is straightforward in traditional automated assembly systems, becomes more complex in the case of collaborative systems. In fact, both task allocation between the human and the robot, and the way they collaborate/interfere with each other during assembly, affect the throughput of CAS. With the aim of taking into account such parameters, we introduce a set of system variables and a mathematical model which allow to estimate the real convenience of the implementation of CAS in the industrial scenario. In the paper, the model is applied to compare CAS to manual assembly and to noncollaborative automated assembly, both with parameters derived from the literature and in a case study. Finally, a set of implementation conditions is derived, related to the task allocation that maximises CAS performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wolfson W, Gordon SJ (1997) . Assem Autom 17(2):116
Rosati G, Faccio M, Carli A, Rossi A (2013) . Assem Autom 33(1):8
Barbazza L, Faccio M, Oscari F, Rosati G (2017) . Assem Autom 37(4):411
Heilala J, Montonen J, Väätäinen O (2008) . Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 222(10):1289
Edmondson N, Redford A (2002) . Assem Autom 22(2):139
Finetto C, Faccio M, Rosati G, Rossi A (2014) . Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(5-8):797
Rosati G, Faccio M, Finetto C, Carli A (2013) . Assem Autom 33(2):165
Colgate JE, Wannasuphoprasit W, Peshkin MA (1996) .. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition (ASME)
Dong Y, Zhang L, Lu D, Bernbardt R, Surdilovic D (2004) .. In: Fifth world congress on intelligent control and automation, 2004. WCICA, vol. 5 (IEEE, 2004), pp 4635–4639
Ou J, Fussell SR, Chen X, Setlock LD, Yang J (2003) .. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Multimodal interfaces (ACM), pp 242–249
McBean JM (2004) Design and control of a voice coil actuated robot arm for human-robot interaction. Ph.D. thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Krüger J, Lien TK, Verl A (2009) . CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(2):628
Hägele M, Schaaf W, Helms E (2002) .. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ISR (International Symposium on Robotics), vol 7
Chen F, Sekiyama K, Cannella F, Fukuda T (2014) . IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 11(4):1065
Arai T, Kato R, Fujita M (2010) . CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(1):5
Rahman SM, Ikeura R (2017) . IET Electr Power Appl 11(7):1235
Matsas E, Vosniakos GC, Batras D (2018) . Robot Comput Integr Manuf 50:168
Schmidt B, Wang L (2013) . Procedia CIRP 7:545
Flacco F, Kröger T, De Luca A, Khatib O (2012) .. In: International conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 338–345
Bascetta L, Ferretti G, Rocco P, Ardö H, Bruyninckx H, Demeester E, Di Lello E (2011) .. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, pp 2971–2978
Huber M, Lenz C, Wendt C, Färber B, Knoll A, Glasauer S (2013) .. In: 2013 IEEE in RO-MAN, IEEE, pp 503–508
Morioka M, Sakakibara S (2010) . CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(1):9
Lasota PA, Rossano GF, Shah JA (2014) .. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), IEEE, pp 339–344
Cherubini A et al (2016) . Robot Comput Integr Manuf 40:1
Faccio M, Gamberi M, Bortolini M (2016) . Int J Prod Res 54(3):761
Hu JJ, Huang CN, Wang HW, Shieh PH, Hu JS (2013) .. In: International conference on advanced robotics and intelligent systems (ARIS), IEEE, pp 28–31
Pellegrinelli S, Admoni H, Javdani S, Srinivasa S (2016) .. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), IEEE, pp 831–838
Duan F, Tan JTC, Arai T (2011) .. In: 2011 30th Chinese in control conference (CCC), IEEE, pp 5468–5473
Green SA, Billinghurst M, Chen X, Chase JG (2008) . Int J Adv Robot Syst 5(1):1
Wei K, Ren B (2018) . Sensors 18(2):571
Coupeté E, Moutarde F, Manitsaris S (2018) Multi-users online recognition of technical gestures for natural humanrobot collaboration in manufacturing. Autonomous Robots. In press, pp 1–17
Brito T, Lima J, Costa P, Piardi L (2017) .. In: Iberian robotics conference (Springer), pp 643–654
Mauro S, Scimmi LS, Pastorelli S (2017) .. In: International conference on robotics in Alpe-Adria Danube Region (Springer), pp 344–352
Heydaryan S, Suaza Bedolla J, Belingardi G (2018) . Appl Sci 8(3):344
Scholer M, Müller IR (2017) . IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1):5694
Wojtynek M, Oestreich H, Beyer O, Wrede S (2017) .. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration
Wu B, Hu B, Lin H (2017) .. In: American control conference (ACC), (IEEE, 2017), pp 1536–1541
Fantini P, Pinzone M, Sella F, Taisch M (2017) .. In: International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics (Springer), pp 259–268
Pearce M, Mutlu B, Shah J, Radwin R (2018) Optimizing makespan and ergonomics in integrating collaborative robots into manufacturing processes. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 15(4):1772–1784
Khalid A, Kirisci P, Khan ZH, Ghrairi Z, Thoben KD, Pannek J (2018) . Comput Ind 97:132
Rosati G, Boschetti G, Biondi A, Rossi A (2009) . Opt Lasers Eng 47(3):320
Rosati G, Faccio M, Barbazza L, Rossi A (2015) . Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(5-8):1289
Finetto C, Rosati G, Faccio M, Rossi A (2015) . Assem Autom 35(1):114
Folkard S, Tucker P (2003) . Occup Med 53(2):95
Nayak A, Reyes Levalle R, Lee S, Nof SY (2016) . Int J Prod Res 54(23):6969
Müller C, Grunewald M, Spengler TS (2017) Redundant configuration of automated flow lines based on “Industry 4.0”-technologies. J Bus Econ 87(7):877–898
EN ISO 10218-1: Safety requirements for industrial robots - Part 1: Robots
EN ISO 10218-2: Safety requirements for industrial robots - Part 2: Robot systems and integration
Sawyer: Rethink robotics unveils new robot. https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/industrial-robots/sawyer-rethink-robotics-new-robot. Accessed: 2017-11-16
Limère V, Landeghem HV, Goetschalckx M, Aghezzaf EH, McGinnis LF (2012) . Int J Prod Res 50(15):4046
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faccio, M., Bottin, M. & Rosati, G. Collaborative and traditional robotic assembly: a comparison model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102, 1355–1372 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03247-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03247-z